Sentences with phrase «temperatures in a given place»

And while many factors shape sea surface temperatures in a given place, the overall trend — directly linked to climate change — is toward hotter oceans.

Not exact matches

In place of shutting the oven off completely, we'll just reduce the heat to 170F, which will give you the freedom to check the roast's temperature periodically with an instant - read thermometer to make sure you pull it out of the oven right when it's ready.

«Because different plants grow at different temperatures, we can constrain what the temperatures were in a given place at a certain time.»

El Niño was in place at the beginning of 2016, giving temperatures a small boost, but it faded quickly over the summer, replaced by a weak La Niña in the fall.

According to the model, the reduction of SO2 emissions in Europe in the past 10 years must give a 5 - 6 K increase in temperature at some places there.

Because the range of modeled wet bulb globe temperatures in a given time and place was narrow, even small increases quickly moved a region out of its historical range, making it easy to see the steady rise in humid warmth.

Given how much yelling takes place on the Internet, talk radio, and elsewhere over short - term cool and hot spells in relation to global warming, I wanted to find out whether anyone had generated a decent decades - long graph of global temperature trends accounting for, and erasing, the short - term up - and - down flickers from the cyclical shift in the tropical Pacific Ocean known as the El Niño — Southern Oscillation, or ENSO, cycle.

As far as this historic period is concerned, the reconstruction of past temperatures based on deep boreholes in deep permafrost is one of the best past temperature proxies we have (for the global regions with permafrost — polar regions and mountainous regions)-- as a signal of average temperatures it's even more accurate than historic direct measurements of the air temperature, since the earth's upper crust acts as a near perfect conservator of past temperatures — given that no water circulation takes place, which is precisely the case in permafrost where by definition the water is frozen.

Such an assumption is especially unwarranted in the case of temperature readings, given that siting problems almost always will increase temperature readings compared to clean sites (e.g., UHI, asphalt, buildings; I have not yet heard of a thermometer placed 10 feet from a tank of outgassing liquid nitrogen, although such is possible).

3 A) CLIMATE VS. WEATHER Climate is the weather pattern in one place over a long period of time Weather is the current atmospheric conditions, including temperature, rainfall, wind, and humidity at a given place

If when two bodies are placed in thermal communication, one of the bodies loses heat, and the other gains heat, that body which gives out heat is said to have a higher temperature than that which receives heat from it.

I envisage that it is quite likely that temperatures today in the Northern Hemisphere are no warmer than they were in the 1930s / 1940, and given that some 95 % of all manmade emissions have taken place since 1940, this suggests that Climate Sensitivity, if any at all, to CO2 is low.

The temperature at any given place can only have had a single value at any given time (it can not be both 21.4 C and 17.6 C simultaneously in my back garden).

A publicly available computer program is used to calculate the difference between surface temperature in a given month and the average temperature for the same place during 1951 to 1980.

Anyway, I have encountered this question out in the wilds, and my response was that the CO2 container would have the lower equilibrium temperature, the N2 container the higher because the CO2 is a good LW emitter and the N2 is not, consistent with, «So if you assume that two contained «bubbles» of gas with a given temperature were placed in space the N2 would cool much more slowly.»

So it's all gases at greatest density will be doing the same thing around the planet at the same time (*) and as these change with differences in density in the play between gravity and pressure and kinetic and potential from greatest near the surface to more rarified, less dense and absent any kinetic to write home about the higher one goes, then, energy conservation intact, the hotter will rise and cool because losing kinetic energy means losing temperature, thus cooling they which began with the closest in density and kinetic energy as a sort of band of brothers near the surface will rise and cool at the same time whereupon they'll all come down together colder but wiser that great heights don't make for more comfort and giving up their heat will sink displacing the hotter now in their place when they first went travelling.

The most of the thermometers measuring temperature at the given position are placed in the air above the ground (please, disregard from what I am writing below if I have misunderstood how the direct stationary temperature measurements are performed).

in Siberia (amongst other places), the high August daytime temperatures of 30 + C give way to -15 / 20C in October.

But that gives little sense of how the temperature changes in specific places might compare with historical norms.

Assuming that temperature is rising and that this is because of GHG effects (not arguing otherwise, just stating the givens), one would do well to look at data from other worlds in our solar system to determine where the «wild» weather is — and it is in the colder places, not the hotter ones.

Just like Google Home, it is built around the smart home concept and lets you perform tasks such as turning off the lights or controlling your home's temperature by giving a voice command, the prerequisite being you have a connected Internet - of - things system in place.