-- I do not see why it is necessary to think of
a temporal end of time.
Not exact matches
When we speak therefore
of Creation,
of God's purposes,
of the
times in which God reveals Himself, and when we speak
of the
end of all things, the coming
of the Kingdom, we use
temporal terms but we are not speaking
of events to which a date can be assigned.
Eschatology in this sense does not have to do with the last things in a
temporal sense but with ultimacy — with finality, not at the
end of time and history, but with what is most real and most vital at all
times in human existence.
It's as if the stoic / pragmatic spirit
of that earlier
time, also to be found in English literature (think
of Ford Madox Ford's World War I — era Parade's
End), had survived the transposition to modern cinema, specifically the strain initiated by Alain Resnais with the somber uncertainties and
temporal splintering
of Hiroshima mon amour (1959).
Its bloody expensive and does not deliver as promised (re; AW WSJ etc) amounting to nothing more than an overpriced partial lease only like with
Time Shares you don't have anything in your possession for daily use when you want it and in the
end you're out every dime you've put in with nothing to show for it other than a few moments
of ephemeral pleasures and the
temporal boosting
of your fragile consumption dependent ego.
At the
end we would have lost frequency accuracy (leakage from the next octave up) and also lost actual
temporal data (the last quarter
of the window - size is missing), though the values stored would be correctly located in
time.