In addition we have an entire literature on pre-school and school choice suggesting that educational interventions can produce long - term success without improving short
term achievement test scores (and vice versa).
Not exact matches
Paul Tough says his research shows that
test scores are not good predictors of long -
term achievement
For example, a student who begins the year at the 50th percentile on the state reading and math
test and is assigned to a teacher in the top quartile in
terms of overall TES
scores will perform on average, by the end of the school year, three percentile points higher in reading and two points higher in math than a peer who began the year at the same
achievement level but was assigned to a bottom - quartile teacher.
The
achievement effects of choice programs after just one or two years may well turn out to be misleading indicators of the longer -
term effects on
test scores and attainment.
Since ESSA requires the use of proficiency rates, one design objective is a combination of measures on academic
achievement to reduce both the short -
term gaming around «bubble kids» (both real and perceived) and also the long -
term incentive to lowball cut -
scores for various
achievement bands on statewide
tests.
There are therefore several things to think about as we further explore the AEI study: long
term outcomes do indeed matter a lot, especially for poor kids; if large
test -
score gains don't eventually translate into improved long
term outcomes, it is a legitimate cause for concern; and we must stay open to the possibility that some programs could help kids immensely over the long haul, even if they don't immediately improve student
achievement.
But, it raises profound challenges to the interpretation of
score trends on high - stakes
tests, to the meaning of
achievement trend and gap reports in
terms of percent proficient, to the interpretation of crossnational
achievement comparisons, and to popular assumptions about
testing of students in special populations (including some assumptions written into law).
The other good long
term news is that Black and Hispanic students, who usually have much lower
test scores than white students, are making greater long -
term progress than whites — shrinking the
achievement gap between whites and the other two groups.
For instance, the high school graduation rate is at a record high, and the
test scores of Black and Hispanic students have outpaced those of white students on long -
term measures of reading and math
achievement.
Commit to embracing arts and arts integration as a long -
term (3 + years) strategy to: decrease the
achievement gap, increase standardized
test scores, and improve school culture and academic improvement simultaneously.
The
term «
achievement gap» refers to the gap between the
test scores of low - income students (or students of color) and their wealthier (or white) peers.
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, a rigorous long -
term study found that TEP produced major
achievement impacts, including
test score gains equal to an additional 1.6 years of school in math, with significant gains in science and English.
These programs showed significant positive benefits in
terms of student self - confidence, positive social behaviors, and
achievement test scores.
We say that the difference between effective and ineffective teachers, at least in
terms of raising
test scores, isn't so wide since out of school factors dominate in
terms of impacting
achievement.
Texas ASCD's Whole Child approach is an effort to move from a focus on narrowly defined academic
achievement as measured by
test scores in core subjects to a broader definition that promotes the long -
term development and success of all children.
These are institutions where the average
test scores of incoming students indicate that they admit a wide range of students in
terms of academic preparation and
achievement.
Under the new standards, for the first time colleges of education will be required to track the performance of their graduates in K - 12 classrooms in
terms of the growth in student
achievement as measured by
test scores and «other factors.»
Are you ready to pick one state over another in
terms of the likelihood that one state has its average student
scoring higher on the NAEP
achievement tests than the other?
We know from the body of school choice research on the experimental effects on
test scores that short
term test scores may not be predictive of long
term achievement or attainment.
According to the study, «These programs showed significant positive benefits in
terms of student self - confidence, positive social behaviors, and
achievement test scores» (David 84).
It does not improve long -
term scores on
achievement tests.
These outcomes were most consistent for school
achievement and cognitive
test scores, and appeared to be sustained into the long
term.
These benefits of earnings supplement programs appear to be concentrated in school
achievement and cognitive
test scores and are sustained in the long
term.
Children of parents in the couple - focused groups were at an advantage in
terms of higher
scores on individually administered
achievement tests, and lower levels of aggressive behaviour at school.