These are intended to address medium and long
term adaptation needs.
Not exact matches
Longer
term I am sure LK / GP could pair up effectively but there will
need to be adjustments and
adaptations before that happens.
«Orphan genes are probably extremely important for rapid, short -
term adaptations, when a species
needs something new and innovative.
This information is
needed in the near -
term (from a season to a year) to mitigate risks to society and ecosystems, and in the longer
term (from a decade to centuries) for effective
adaptation planning.
«Because of metabolic
adaptations to prolonged changes in diet composition, the results of such short -
term studies can not be applied to longer -
term situations... Although more long -
term studies are
needed before a firm conclusion can be drawn, it appears, from most literature studied, that a VLCARB is, if anything, protective against muscle protein catabolism during energy restriction, provided that it contains adequate amounts of protein.»
This poses the
need for our shorter
term glycolytic
adaptations, these
adaptations are going to help us buffer fatigue and recover in between each set more quickly — therefore allowing us to keep the weight on the bar for longer periods of time before having to drop.
In
terms of plot this shares some similarities with Nicolas Winding Refn's aforementioned film; it's a literary
adaptation, it's about one man's crusade to rescue someone in
need and they're both directed by Europeans who have entered into the American market.
David Gordon Green's film Stronger is an
adaptation of Bauman's memoir of the same name, and depicts Bauman's struggles coming to
terms with his new life dealing with disability and living in an area of Boston that is not exactly conducive to his
needs.
My point is simply that we
need to try to get a handle on what's most likely to be most heavily impacted in the nearest
term future, so that we can (hopefully) take appropriate actions on the
adaptation front.
Declare that, irrespective of the effectiveness of mitigation actions, significant adverse changes in the global climate are now inevitable and are already taking place, and thus parties to the U.N.F.C.C.C. must also include, in the COP15 outcome document, an ambitious agreement on
adaptation finance which should prioritize the
needs of the most vulnerable countries, especially in the near
term,
One of the major limits to climate change
adaptation is the context in which it
needs to take place and efforts to slow or reverse negative impacts
need to engage the long -
term place based change in economy, nature, and society.
The paper suggests that long -
term strategic
adaptation plans for the full range of possible SLR
need to be widely developed.
e Commit adequate and predictable new and additional long -
term finance to support developing countries to reduce their emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change with a particular focus on addressing the current structural underfunding of
adaptation needs;
He argues that to tackle global warming we
need smarter solutions focused on getting long -
term solutions like cost - competitive renewables and that many of the impacts of global warming would be better addressed through
adaptation.»
Although this creates learning opportunities, successive short -
term decisions
need to be monitored to avoid unwittingly creating an
adaptation path that is not sustainable as climate change continues, or which would cope only with a limited sub-set of possible climate futures.
The Summit report identifies seven priorities for near -
term action, starting with the
need to develop «an overarching national strategy to guide federal climate climate change
adaptation programs.
If NDCs are to become the long -
term instrument for international cooperation, negotiation, and ratcheting up of ambitions to address climate change, then they
need to become more transparent and comparable, both with respect to mitigation goals, and to issues such as
adaptation, finance, and the way in which NDCs are aligned with national policies.
A key component in answering this question will be a
need to establish the likelihood, and realized extent, of species acclimation (or
adaptation) to environmental change [7,8] and, if common across functionally important taxa, how such coping and adaptive strategies will alter species — environment interactions in the long
term [9].
The
Adaptation Fund has very little resources; The Green Climate Fund is Empty (GCF); technology transfer is not successful because of the Intellectual Property Rights are being held tightly by Europe and the US; the 30 billion dollars for fast start finance is not all new and additional, most of it is repackaged Official Development Aid (ODA) and is mostly loans rather than grants; there is no clear plan to address the incredibly low target of 100 billion dollars annually that is
needed by 2020 for long
term finance, developed countries do not even want to engage in a conversation to address climate finance.
These changes result in an
adaptation of our practice in
terms of strategy, for example, the
need to start a business before applying for residency, a particular region that has adapted this is Wallonia, whereas Brussels clearly became a place to avoid.