Sentences with phrase «term compatibility between»
We rank it as our number one matchmaking service because the platform's high - tech algorithm focuses on interests over looks, thus ensuring long - term compatibility between singles.
http://www.datingadvice.com/
The psychological science has not provided the ability to predict long - term compatibility between a couple who have never met.
Not exact matches
With a member base of predominantly educated professionals between the ages of 30 - 55, EliteSingles uses intelligent matchmaking to unite couples with long term compatibility in mind.
Our long - term experience has proven that the strongest unions are formed between people with the highest degree of compatibility.
Latest Research in Theories of Romantic Relationships Development shows: compatibility is all about a high level on personality similarity between prospective mates for long term mating with commitment.
Anyway they will conclude compatibility is all about a high level on personality * similarity * between prospective mates for long term mating with commitment.
The difference between short - term lust and genuine love is genuine compatibility — where one's weaknesses are complimented by the other's strengths, and where common interests create the basis for mutual understanding.
The difference between a short - winded fling and a committed long - term relationship is compatibility.
The guest list for each event is customized using Match's group matching algorithms in terms of age, gender, and interests to facilitate maximum compatibility between guests.
Compatibility is all about a high level on personality similarity between prospective mates for long term mating with commitment.
«It's hard to find consistent, long - term, high - quality service learning,» says Sarah Pearson of the American Youth Policy Forum in Washington, D.C. Pearson's recent report, Finding Common Ground: Service Learning and Education Reform (2002), establishes the compatibility between the goals of comprehensive school reform models and those of service learning.
Yes, the lack of backward compatibility, regular format turnover and long - term competition between proprietary technologies will hopefully one day be looked upon by a future society as incredibly dumb and wasteful to the medium.
Can anyone discuss the differences between the Forster & Gregory approach, and the Lindzen approach, and maybe also comment on the likely statistical compatibility of the two outcomes in terms of sensitivity?