Regulatory and policy uncertainty in recent months created significant near -
term excess supply and price erosion.
Not exact matches
Reviewed by local regulators for almost a year, that local marriage was only step one for the Brahma boys, who saw an industry ripe for consolidation and initiated a strategy to improve margins by buying up brewers, eliminating duplicative operations, cutting
excess suppliers, and other steps that formed today's beer market, which is fragmented by brand but consolidated in
terms of ownership.
But in the near / medium -
term, I'm far more comfortable betting on continued
excess demand for premium fur, rather than a sudden
supply surplus.
When you look at the realities of
supply we dramatically over-delivered for launch in
terms of March launch month, but the demand has been well in
excess of even our high end estimates.
The much talked about variability problem of wind power should dramatically fall as weather forecasting gets smarter and smarter, and as our power grids get more dynamic in
terms of managing demand, storing
excess and rerouting
supply to where it is needed.
Also, though it's not directly relevant to the issue of the most productive approach in
terms of our own long
term interests (which I think if people really understood this problem would involve a lot more fealty to moving off of FF now, and the idea of building even more coal plants — which are also responsible for most of the
excess that allows bio accumulation of the serious neurological toxin mercury in our food
supply, damages watersheds, mountain tops, sometimes whole communities and ecosystems, and, CC aside, is also very polluting — would be more apt to be seen as the idiocy it is), in some sense, no one has a full inherent right to anything really we as a world have built up: It has been a collective effort and you can only drive a Ferrari for instance, because of the hard work of countless others before you and along side you.