IMN maintains a long -
term exclusive license with TDK which expires in 2032.
Not exact matches
«Under the
terms of an
exclusive 10 - year
licensing agreement with Weight Watchers, Greencore will be developing ranges in a number of chilled food categories, including quiche, sandwiches, salads and pizzas.»
As per the
terms of the agreement, Roche gains an
exclusive worldwide
license to PTC's SMA programme, which includes three compounds currently in preclinical development, as well as potential back - up compounds.
But Amazon's
terms of service give it
exclusive rights to stories and a
license to use new elements in them — like original characters or specific settings.
The Goodreads
license grant includes the
term «non-
exclusive»; the Amazon
terms of use don't use that phrase, but since they don't explicitly state «
exclusive,» I don't believe the Amazon
terms of use abrogate your right to publish and use your content as you wish elsewhere.
Similarly,
licenses may be
exclusive or non-
exclusive, world - wide or geographically - restricted, short -
term or perpetual, royalty - free or royalty - paying, limited to a particular language or format, such as audio, print, or eBooks.
To be effective under the Copyright Act of 1976, an
exclusive license must be in writing, and the writing must clearly define the key
terms of the grant of
license, including duration, royalty payments, and the name on the copyright notice.
Bonus: Is there a difference between the
terms under the
exclusive license of and under the
exclusive license to?
(a) In consideration of the payment to the Editor of the fee and / or applicable royalty percentages of the Publishers» receipts set out in Clause 9, the Editor grants to the Publishers the sole and
exclusive right and
license to adapt, produce and publish, and to
license others to adapt, produce and publish, the whole or any part of the Editor's part in and to the Work and any Contribution written for inclusion therein or any abridgement, adaptation or translation of the Editor's part in and to the Work, in all forms and media, in the English language only throughout the world for the full
term of copyright, (including all renewals and extensions of that
term).
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents»
licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were
licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using
exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «
exclusive right to sell» and «
exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its
terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on
license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the
terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers»
licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained