Sentences with phrase «term global warming skeptic»

Not exact matches

The reason progressives constantly obscure the meaning of terms like skeptic, «global warming,» «AGW» (when you mean CAGW), is so you can convert your political opinions into «science,» and then falsely label your political opponents as anti-science.
Santer et al. also debunked the «skeptic» myths that global warming is just due to internal variability, and that a short - term slowing in the rate of warming means global warming has magically stopped.
«Avatar» director James Cameron double - dared global warming disaster skeptics to debate him — then morphed into a chicken and cackled off when they accepted his increasingly ludicrous debate terms, calling his critics «swine» as he headed for the hills.
When constantly confronted with this myth that global warming stopped in 1998, or 2000, or 2002, or 2005, or [insert year], we wonder why distinguishing between short - term noise and long - term signal is such a difficult concept for climate «skeptics
Originally denoted «climate change skeptics» or «anthropogenic (human - induced) global warming skeptics», the term referred to those who are as yet unconvinced by evidence that emissions of man - made CO2 significantly enhance the natural atmospheric greenhouse effect.
The use of the term «global warming skeptic» is falling into disuse.
I'm alternately told by «skeptics» (1) it's regional impact that's important, (2) it's global data that's more important, (3) there is no such thing as «global temperatures,» (4) «skeptics» are not monolithic, (5) «skeptics» don't doubt that global temperatures are warming (and that it is to some extent influenced by AC02), or alternately «we dismiss non-Global data), (6) all methodologyies used to determine global temps are unreliable, (7) global warming has stopped, (8) we're experiencing global cooling, (9) what matters is long term trends, (10) short - term trends are significant, (11) what's happening in Arctic isn't important (because it's regional), (12) what's happening in the Antarctic is important (despite it being regional).
John H, my point is that the global warming skeptics don't deserve the term «skeptic».
Imagine how much «skeptics» would trip if a textbook for students contained the term «global warming denier».
December 5, 2014 Public discussion of scientific topics such as global warming is confused by misuse of the term «skeptic
Public discussion of scientific topics such as global warming is confused by misuse of the term «skeptic
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z