It is truly a short term gain, long
term loss scenario.
Not exact matches
It ensures long -
term profitability, he says: «I never want to get caught in the
scenario where I may have to sell it at a
loss.
This isn't a case of «what have you done for me lately» as that would imply that things went off the rails fairly recently, and it's certainly not a change simply for the sake of change
scenario, as we're not so naive to believe that this alone would guarantee long -
term success, this is a measured response based on YEARS of questionable decisions, failed tactics, boardroom blunders, unprecedented
losses and a level of dishonesty never before seen at our club.
At a 10 - year Treasury yield of 1.7 %, interest on reserves of 0.25 %, and a monetary base now at about 18 cents per dollar of nominal GDP (see Run, Don't Walk), further purchases of long -
term Treasury securities by the Fed would produce net
losses for the Fed in any
scenario where yields rise more than about 20 basis points a year, or the Fed ever has to unwind any portion of its already massive positions.
Actuaries think longer -
term; they think about
scenarios where
loss experience might prove to be unsustainable.
In this
scenario, you can carry forward the Short
Term Capital
Losses to subsequent 8 fiscal years.
You could even argue that in a liquidation
scenario the deferred income tax liability would disappear since the company would record massive
losses if all long
term assets would be valued at zero (which you do when you look at just NCAV).
Any number of
scenarios can compromise a borrower's ability to manage their student loans, from a job
loss, to a lower - paying career change (think nonprofits), to a short -
term disability.
, now to the worst the scheme is performing very badly and has addede up to my
loss, in such a
scenario can i redeem all the units and book short
term capital
loss and can i set of this against my long
term capital gain which i have realised by selling my property,.
Develop a risk assessment of overall investments if the best - and worst - case
scenarios for climate change play out in
terms of potential financial
losses.
These long -
term medical incapacity
scenarios, coupled with the high costs of medical care necessary to recover from such events are the main causes of financial
loss.
In the above
scenario, the couple is better off purchasing a 20 to 30 - year
term life policy to hold them over until they reach retirement, when the risk of income
loss and child - care expenses disappears.