Sentences with phrase «term means nothing»

This goes for any product on grocery store shelves that is misleading customers into thinking they are also «all natural» when in actuality, the term means nothing in terms of it's quality.

The terms meant nothing more than that.

Not exact matches

What I mean is that the «backwardation» has almost everything to do with the near - zero official short - term interest rate and almost nothing to do with gold supply / demand.

If you have no credit history whatsoever, they have nothing to go on, which means you'll get hit with less - than - ideal terms because lenders like to hedge their bets.

This is a term used to describe issue of meaning, belonging and drive in humans and has nothing at all to do with supernatural spirits.

If by God is meant the Ground of Being, the Essence of Being, the Absolute, the Weltgeist, and all similar expressions, the reply is still No, for according to Schweitzer such terms «denote nothing actual, but something conceived in abstractions which for that reason is also absolutely meaningless» (The Philosophy of Civilization [Macmillan, 1949], p. 304).

The central allegation of paradox seems to me to run roughly as follows: a nontemporal divine experience would include in itself all events in time (cf. CSPM 105); but to experience all temporal events simultaneously would dissolve any real distinction between past and future (cf. CSPM 66); so there could be no temporal transition, no change, no contingency, and no freedom (cf. CSPM 137); and since nothing could become, there could be no real permanent and unchanging reality either, «for then the contrast between the terms, and therewith their meaning, must vanish» (CSPM 166).

In terms of meaning and origin, our Saturday and the Sabbath day have nothing in common.

For many, the word has nothing to do with a spiritual context... I embrace the term evangelical, if by that we mean a belief that we together can actually work for change in the world, caring for the environment, extending to the poor generosity and kindness, a hopeful outlook.

If stripped of all technical connotations, we can take the term «prehension» to mean simply «holding,» then the phrase «infinite, non-negative prehension» informs us only that nothing is «held negatively» — that is, nothing is effectively excluded or «relegated to the background» — but this still does not explain precisely how everything is positively «held together.»

They can't come to terms with the idea that there may actually be nothing after we die so they latch on to a belief that gives them comfort... belief in an afterlife, eternity or any version of «god» is nothing more than a coping mechanism for those who can't accept that we are in fact finite creatures that are born, live, and die and are not meant or destined to exist for eternity.

Only if you take the term «logically» to mean, jumping to wild conclusion based on nothing, then you are correct.

i just lived thru an abortion, granted i am a dude so it was my wife that had the truma... i don't mean to make it sound like nothing but i have a 10 month old and a 6 yr old... the abortion was nothing WHEN compared to raising them or even carring them to term.

Constantly using the term «kill» as though it meant nothing was used to desensitize the recruits to the notion of killing and its implications.

Apart from the fact that Genesis says nothing (even remotely) of the sort, I would not presume to comment on the Psalms, as I have not actually studied them, except to say that I v «aguely recall the translation of the word from Hebrew to the English word «fool» is a corruption of the Hebrew term which actually means (a person who is) «morally deficient», which might cast the statement in the psalm in a slightly different light.

However, this does not mean that nothing can be said to clarify and render more precise the particular way in which one chooses to use these terms, for here one finds real and significant variety.

Nothing but confusion results if we simply apply the common meanings of these two terms when we use them in the context of his metaphysic.

For at this point in a fundamental ontological datum we must not deviate into mere empirical fact and think that we could attribute to the knowing subject some impetus that would mean the term of transcendence was merely there as a goal confronting the movement indifferently and extrinsically and having in itself nothing to do with the movement.

For in the sense in which he uses the term «literal» in the other passages in which he affirms the same categorial terms to have a literal rather than either a symbolic or an analogical meaning, it means nothing other than «univocal» (although, as we shall see presently, this is not the only sense in which he uses the term «literal»).

It speaks of this person in mythological terms, but does this mean that we can reject the kerygma altogether on the ground that it is nothing more than mythology?

If nothing else, religion is nothing more than a coping mechanism for those who fear death so much that they can't come to terms with the possibility that we are simply finite creatures who are not meant to exist for eternity.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

I mean nothing can prove that religion is godly made: maybe needed, but if a God creates all this which even in science terms called intelligent design why only so called religios people have to fight evoulation or defend a God?!

Moreover, the amount of «information,» in this sense, has nothing whatever to do with bringing about any action outside the closed universe; that is to say, it has nothing to do with «meaning,» in any sense of that term.

A primary principle of educational psychology is the law of apperception; nothing has meaning until it is apperceived in terms of what has already been experienced and known.

Sin is only a biblical term that means nothing in any department that has any say on these matters.

Some highlights of this collection are Khaled Abou El Fadl's eloquent explication of the complexities and restraints behind implementation of the death penalty under Islamic law; an interesting intersection between Fadl's discussion of reticence in the use of the death penalty and David Novak's review of capital cases in Jewish tradition; Stanley Hauerwas's unequivocal claim that the cross is justice (negatively in terms of Jesus» execution according to human law and positively in terms of the ultimate meaning of the cross as mercy and forgiveness); and, conversely, the claim by Beth Wilkinson, prosecutor in the Timothy McVeigh case, that «Even as a Christian, I felt nothing for Mr. McVeigh.»

There is nothing here so far that is incompatible with a pure phenomenalism: «An event which is an active condition is a cause of the occurrence of the sense - object in its situation for the percipient event; at least, it can be so termed in one of the many meanings of the word «cause»» (PNK 86).

I highly doubt Otherhand is an evangelical Christian (a term overused & stretched way beyond it's meaning to evangelize — proclaming the good news to the lost) when he / she says «has nothing to do with real Christianity and uses religion in it's most nefarious disguise — to shower contempt on others.»

The term sometimes means nothing more than clear thinking, an ideal promoted by any class in which the professor requires attention to evidence, cogent arguments, and clarity of expression.

I never understand the term — some mean nothing refined, some mean nothing fake, some mean no animal fats and some mean the opposite, some mean low calories or fat... what does healthy mean??

If you hear terms such as «spot» bowling, «alley sense» and others which mean nothing to you, don't concern yourself with them at this time.

When you say stupid team with a coach out of his depths are you really being ignorant or intelligent.Also the fact that if we had played PSG, Real Madrid etc. during pre-season and won it still means absolutely nothing in terms of the fact that it does not determine our season whatsoever and does not guarantee us success but what it only means is that we beat them.So when I see people stressing on things like those I roll my eyes.As I said earlier if you win a match today you can lose tomorrow and vice versa.No match is dependent on the other.You had better stop wasting your time.

I hope we keep wenger give the man a long term contract you must want some unloyal cheapskate whos been fired at 5 clubs and successful at 1 or 2 for a few years when the club spent big cause they got a new manager and after a couple years got fired beacause those spendy players got old and that manager did nothing we have the most loyal consistent winning manager in europe and if the linesman did nt make incorrect call we woould of been 1 - 0 up and mkhitaryan played poor balls in the rain which we always play bad in amd are you suffering short term memory loss we beat tottenham 2 - 0 at home so we still won the derby on aggregate this season again thanks to mr.wenger i mean where to people come out woth these low iq thoughts and mostly you have to fire three new managers before you get a couple good seasons then start the circus again people should be embarrassed wenger to stay

But replacing Wenger with a new manager will mean nothing in the long term if we really want Arsenal to become Europe's elite... «Wenger Out» can only bring short term success.

But enthusiasm means nothing in terms of team success if a significant percentage of the team members are sitting on the sideline watching.

Pre-season results mean nothing in the long term, just ask multi Emirates Cup winning manager Arsene Wenger.

The game meant nothing in terms of progression to the next round for the Gunners but there were some concerns that Wenger will soon need to address.

Instead we mutter about the West of England, which to others from outside the area means absolutely nothing — it's not a place many can relate to or can even locate because it doesn't really exist, it's purely a term we have ended up with because we couldn't call it Greater Bristol!

Given that going to Albany would mean a smaller paycheck and a longer commute, and that Cabrera won't be term - limited until 2021, sources suggested Cabrera's main motivation for mounting another assault on the sitting state senator is nothing more than personal acrimony.

The term «sustainability» means essentially nothing to most people.

Since there is nothing like model 213 in the West, precisely what this means is unclear, but Murphy describes it as «a term that is understood».

If the technical terms mentioned there mean nothing to you, then the summary is this: rutin can improve the action of insulin, lowering the amount you need in your bloodstream.

I'm quite tired of bloggers throwing around the term «low - carb» without pointing out, as Jeff and Tatertot have done here, that the term really means next to nothing.

If like me, you have NO IDEA when it comes to gymnastics, some of those terms may mean absolutely nothing to you.

Even though it means nothing in terms of my schedule since I'm not taking any classes, it does mean there are exponentially more people on campus (and on the bus) and that my advisor has his mind split between teaching and advising.

While some may argue the loss of innocence as the deeper meaning behind the saying, I can argue that nothing ever stays on top speaking in terms of Hollywood.

Kung Fu Panda 2 offers nothing to tantalize adult viewers in terms of delivering quips and double meanings beyond the understanding of their kid companions.

The term «stage fall» meant nothing to Chris Farley, sometimes truly suffering for his art.

Although the term «productivity» is typically regarded as a four - letter word in K - 12 conversations, teacher productivity means nothing more than how much good a given teacher can do.