Geoengineering has created short term toxic cool - downs at the cost of an even worse overall long
term planetary warming.
This relatively modest release of CO ₂ might have contributed to long -
term planetary warming.
Not exact matches
Forty - four percent (44 %) of U.S. voters now say long -
term planetary trends are the cause of global
warming, compared to 41 % who blame it on human activity.
I have an article running in The Times on recent vagaries in
planetary temperature, which almost all scientific experts on global
warming describe as a brief and normal hiatus from the long -
term warming driven by greenhouse gases.
This implies that the CRF levels must have systematically decreased over time, causing a long -
term decrease in the low cloud fraction and hence a long -
term reduction in the
planetary albedo, that again would be responsible for the
warming.
From Rasmussen Reports Voters in recent months have been increasingly skeptical of the idea that global
warming is chiefly caused by human activity, but the number who blame long
term planetary trends instead has now fallen back to its lowest level in nearly a year.
Climate engineering can create short
term surface cool - downs at the cost of an even worse overall
planetary warming.
«In fact, 50 % of voters now believe that global
warming is caused primarily by long -
term planetary trends, a high for the year.
«We need to raise the level of our game in
terms of explaining the
planetary warming by infrared absorption of CO2 etc..
The highly toxic short
term engineered cool - downs come at the cost of an even worse overall
planetary warming, this includes the Earth's oceans.
The conclusion: Planting a forest in the United States could cool the Earth for a few decades, but would lead to
planetary warming in the long
term.