I'm talking about something more fundamental: YouCut is dishonest, the cynical act of a leadership that's put the scoring of short -
term political points ahead of developing a coherent plan to govern.
When the opposition refused to cooperate Mr Huhne hit out, accusing them of putting «short -
term political point - scorning ahead of the long - term interests of the planet».
Not exact matches
Asked what it does to monitor foreign propaganda or prevent the buying of illegal
political ads, Facebook merely
pointed out its
terms of service, which require advertisers to comply with «all applicable laws and regulations.»
But with so many interests — and
political careers — at stake, the risk that talks could fall through at any
point remains a serious risk,» he warned, adding that such a scenario would have an impact of a 1.5 percent contraction on the U.K.'s long -
term growth trend.
They
point to an article that you wrote in March, I think, of 2012 in Policy Options, where you basically said, dirty oil, the tar sands it's called, dirty oil and the future of our country, where you argue that the development of the, as you use the word, tar sands, it's become a
political term, by the way, as you know, is basically not necessarily good for the country, in fact it takes jobs away in the manufacturing sector of Ontario.
But the same
point can be made in
terms of economic and
political systems.
Worse still — and more to the
point of my concern — the translation of the one Word of God into direct social and
political terms has meant that the churches neglect the message for which they do have sole responsibility, that which constitutes their specific raison d'etre, and which no other agency in the world is called on or is competent to proclaim: the gospel of Holy Scripture which has the power to make people wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (2 Timothy 3:15).
In most cases they have overcome both
political fragmentation and government overload by replacing their old governmental bureaucracies with an innovative and effective form of governance: coalitions (composed of business, government, nonprofits, universities, neighborhood and minority associations, and religious groups) that develop a cooperative agenda to improve the city and that assume many of the city government's traditional functions (economic development, long -
term planning, educational reform, even care of the homeless), and that also operate like
political parties of yore (providing the
point of access for new groups and a public realm for discourse, debate, and negotiation concerning matters of the common good).
Crawford situates Wahhabism in the second part of the twentieth century within what he
terms the formation of «hybrid» radical groups — Al - Qa «ida and ISIS, but also earlier groups such as the Awakening movement that took shape in the early 1990's that «infused [Wahhabism] with new ideas» and «drew the line between belief and unbelief at new
points on the religio -
political spectrum.»
I don't deny that wrong decisions were made at probably all of the councils at some
point, but of the councils that truly shaped Christianity, the seven ecumenical councils, while they are ridden with strife and
political maneuvering as well as true Christian devotion and worship, I believe that most of what they decided in
terms of doctrine is not wrong.
My main
point is that now that Marxism has ceased to be a threat in
terms of
political and military power, its analysis is becoming more and more relevant.
My
point is that the Labour blogosphere is too uncritical of the government on civil liberties - that, in your
terms, it contributes to the «
political culture and dominant
political discourses» that are the driver of the problem, rather than contesting this culture and these discourses.
What Fallon is trying to do is
point out, without actually saying it in
terms, that the British
political system is designed to ensure newcomer parties can't do well.
M5S approach to politics is not just innovative in
terms of
political participation, [2] but also from an ideological stand
point.
As the party prepares to sign off on key policy
points at its spring conference this weekend, an attempt will be made to seize the
political agenda and set the
terms of debate.
Election barometer The
Political Forecasting Unit's «election barometer», designed to capture the changing state of the race as it unfolds through the campaign, shows the Conservatives one
point ahead of the Liberal Democrats in
terms of vote share, with Labour four
points further adrift.
'» (Farley was a legendary New York
political operative who served as Franklin Roosevelt's campaign manager in 1932 and 1936, and, more to the
point, was postmaster general during FDR's first two
terms.)
The big society and the post-bureaucratic age are ugly
terms, but they
point to liberal thinking: a
political system that sees individuals and the relations between them as superior to the state.
Now that she's won statewide election by a 26 -
point margin, and has no credible challengers on the horizon for next year, when she'll run for a full
term, it's becoming clearer what she intends to do with the remarkable
political opportunity she has been given.
Toolman - sympathetic to your
point about
term limits; but the main reason there is such a strong case for
term limits nowadays is because the districts have been made so dafe for one party or another that it's very difficult for my preferred check and balance (aka «an election») on past - their - sell - by - date
political hacks to work normally.
Loosely (extremely loosely), the media is hugely left - wing (leaving aside the
point I agree with that left / right is a highly imprecise and largely meaningful
term); and therefore anything the media says about the right - including calling Nazism «right» - is aimed not at some universal truth but at scoring
political points against their opponents.
«Rather than scoring
political points they should be reaching out to create a cross-party approach striking the right balance between effective security measures and the need to win the long -
term battle for hearts and minds,» he said.
By this
point in his
political career, Bloomberg was an Independent, having made the switch in the middle of his second
term as mayor.
«I'm sorry that it's gotten so
political,» says Swackhamer, whose 3 - year
term runs until next spring, at which
point she hopes to be reappointed to a second
term.
Headteachers were right to speak out, she said, because telling parents that school budgets race real -
terms cuts is «not a
political point, it's a fact».
Ralph Smith, managing director of the Campaign for Grade - Level Reading, a collaborative effort of
political, education, business and advocacy leaders to close the nation's literacy gap, said «We shouldn't be at all surprised by the NAEP scores... we can
point to nothing substantial in
terms of interventions or programs that would have made that number different.»
This picks up the growth in debt, the misaligned short -
term versus long -
term incentives, crowd behavior, imitation,
political agreement with booms, finger -
pointing during busts, etc..
And so, Raad's astringent performance and sizable exhibition of works associated with the long -
term project Scratching on Things I Could Disavow (2007 — ongoing) delve into the after - effects of violence in the Middle East that are not only
political but also economic, such as the creation of a retirement fund for artists that blithely hops across the major fault line of the Arab — Israeli conflict, or the construction of new museum projects in the Gulf, or the movement of Raad's own work in relation to art - historical narratives in different places and times that exert various pressures on him, which at one
point appear to drive the artist - as - performer insane.
This group exhibition takes the
term «snowflake» as a starting
point, a
term used pejoratively by the
political right to code dissent as whining, vulnerability as over-sensitivity and the right...
Perhaps unexpectedly, the primary concerns of Michael Dean's (b. 1977) Government do not include satire, contemporary politics or acerbic finger
pointing and it is refreshing to encounter an exhibition with such a value - laden title that is concerned instead with the fundamental worth of the
term rather than its party -
political resonance.
At this
point I feel that so many
political terms have caused rifts in our social fabric, and I tend to look for a common language whenever I can.
What stuck with me is what Morris Ward, editor of Yaleclimatemediumforum.org, posing: «At some
point,» he said, «the public at large has to step up to the plate in
terms of scientific and policy literacy, in
terms of commitment to education and strong and effective
political leadership, and in
terms of their own general self - improvement.»
The PNAS paper makes a key
point: «These precipitation and temperature effects are statistically significant but have modest influence in
terms of predictive power in a model with
political, economic, and physical geographic predictors.
In what may prove to be a turning
point for
political action on climate change, a breathtaking new study casts extreme doubt about the near -
term stability of global sea levels.
Yet, revealingly, «Tipping
point» is not a scientific but a
political term.
Long before the Internet, newspapers and magazines could often be defined in
political terms, and many people would flock to those offering congenial
points of view.
There is no validity in the «hockey stick» plot, «talking up» such predeterministic «experiments» is NOT an action of SCIENCE, but of Politics and I again
point to the persistent attempts to cite «attitude» towards the «greenhouse platform» in
terms of a «
Political Siding», again to escape notice of the LACK of SCIENCE within the «greenhouse platform»... Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod (tm) From the PC of Peter K Anderson E-Mail:
[email protected] http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
But the fact that the
political right is engaged in denialist practices on a whole range of issues, is something which even the most «balanced» of mainstream media outlets like USA Today and the Washington Post are now
pointing out, and so I'll use whichever
term seems more appropriate from now on.
One of the
points I have made before on various occasions is that fundamentally totalitarianism isn't really
political — at least not in the sense that people mean the
term «
political.»
According to Bloomberg, it's because «mayors don't have the luxury of talking and not achieving,» which is actually true from a
political point of view: their
term is usually four years, and lack of results translates in lack of votes.
This is disappointing news: here at Treehugger, we've repeatedly driven the
point home that the president has almost no control over the price of gas in the short -
term — a cocktail of global demand, oil speculation, and
political instability in volatile regions determines the price of gas more than anything else.
He was only
pointing out that in the last 50 years we have not been able to summon the
political will to put our nuclear waste in a proper long
term facility.
Among the
points of contention are that predictions of near -
term production increases in Saudi Arabia are optimistic; that the study underemphasizes
political and security challenges to extracting oil from Iraq and, crucially, that it fundamentally misrepresents the record of recent depletion estimates by failing to take into account that newer, horizontal wells do not deplete gradually over time:
Once again, the needs of injury victims are getting eroded for short -
term political gain based on insurance industry talking -
points.
Adding fuel to all of this
political fire is an evolving media landscape that some brokers say is not exactly helping the situation — at least in
terms of promoting a stable economic environment like the one that is supported by most of the key economic data
points of the past year (i.e., inflation, employment and gross domestic product).