Sentences with phrase «term prediction of future climate»

In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that long - term prediction of future climate state is not possible.

In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

In 2007, WG1.said «we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled nonlinear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

Chief Hydrologist posts «We are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

That forecast is consistent with a statement in the aforementioned IPCC technical report: «In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

Truth n ° 21 As said by IPCC in its TAR (2001) «we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

As said by IPCC in its TAR (2001) «we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

IPCC AR3 2001 Paragraph 5 section 14.2.2.2 states «In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

I would reming these believers that the 2003 report says:» In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

The models don't work because a) their continuing tendency to exaggerate beyond reason indicates prejudice on the part of those who are supplying them with data; and b) «the climate is a coupled, non-linear chaotic object», and, therefore, «the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible» (IPCC, 2001, para. 14.2.2.2).

«WG1.said «we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled nonlinear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

Even IPCC's 2001 summary assessment report conceded that «The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

The 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report that governments accept as certain predictions of future weather says, «In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

«The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

``... we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled nonlinear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

Even the IPCC said: «The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

The IPCC acknowledged in its own 2007 report that «The long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

Samson wrote: when I am discussing with climate skeptics, they often refer to the third report of the IPCC (page 774): «In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

Hi, when I am discussing with climate skeptics, they often refer to the third report of the IPCC (page 774): «In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long - term prediction of future climate states is not possible.»

Not exact matches

At present, the long - term recovery of the Ozone Layer from the effects of CFCs is still on track, but the presence of increasing dichloromethane will add some uncertainty to our future predictions of ozone and climate.»

At present, the long - term recovery of the Ozone Layer from the effects of CFCs is still on track, but the presence of increasing dichloromethane will lead to uncertainty in our future predictions of ozone and climate.»

In terms of prediction, there is little reason to think that response of the climate to CO2 will change dramatically in the future.

... in climate research and modeling we should recognise that we are dealing with a complex non linear chaotic signature and therefore that long - term prediction of future climatic states is not possible...

«In terms of how we should think about climate change prediction in the future, reducing emissions and so on, it really wouldn't make much of a difference.»

(2) If the answer is yes, i.e. we already have what we need in terms of raw observational data, is it an accurate summary of your position to say that achieving these useful predictions of future climate behavior is simply a matter of applying an appropriate and scientifically defensible series of analytical techniques?

In other words they say clearly that it is not possible to make future long - term predictions of climate.

Therefore, the AASC recommends that policies related to long - term climate not be based on particular predictions, but instead should focus on policy alternatives that make sense for a wide range of plausible climatic conditions regardless of future climate.

... The difficulty of prediction and the impossibility of verification of predictions decades into the future are important factors that allow for competing views of the long - term climate future.

The mid-Pliocene (∼ 3 to 3.3 Ma ago), is a period of sustained global warmth in comparison to the late Quaternary (0 to ∼ 1 Ma ago), and has potential to inform predictions of long - term future climate change.

More usefully in terms of future predictions, a recent paper in PNAS by Van Vuuren and co-workers (including a friend of mine, Tom Wigley, who is an Adjunct Professor at the University of Adelaide), assessed the impact on climate change of some plausible real - world actions.