This flurry of research and review is of course timed to help world leaders at Davos concentrate on the longer -
term problems of climate change, environmental degradation, and food security, in addition to immediate problems of economic stagnation, poverty, conflict and so on.
Not exact matches
Kuntzsch was not sure if it was proof
of long
term climate change, but said it was a
problem for the country's seafood industry.
This is especially true, given that many
of the
problems we face have a longer -
term dimension:
climate change, pensions and social care, and international economic development are just some
of the more obvious examples.
The format
of the initiatives meant that they not only learnt about the science
of environmental
problems such as
climate change, but were also engaged in considering solutions and how to bring them about, both in
terms of their own lives and community and the wider political context.
«The portions
of the West that are already stretched in
terms of water resources — Arizona, New Mexico, the High Plains
of Texas, the southern Central Valley — for those places that are already having
problems,
climate change is going to tighten the screws,» Meixner said.
One
of the major
problems, as Latif explained, is that there are just very few long -
term oceanic measurements, thereby complicating the analysis and interpretation
of climate change signals.
Professor David Schultz, one
of the authors
of the guest editorial, said: «One
of the long -
term effects
of climate change is often predicted to be an increase in the intensity and frequency
of many high - impact weather events, so reducing greenhouse gas emissions is often seen to be the response to the
problem.
More precisely monitoring dolphins with seafloor recordings could provide new insight into how these animals respond to environmental
problems such as oil spills and the long -
term effects
of climate change.
A host
of problems, including overfishing, practices such as cyanide and dynamite fishing that cause long -
term reef damage, coastal development, and
climate change are all taking their toll on the ecosystem and its biodiversity.
Highlights
of the 67th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting in Chemistry were: the importance
of developing environmental friendly technologies, working with green chemistry and facing the
climate change problem as well as to link society to science, in
terms of divulgation and pertinence
of the research.
Generation and storage
of biochar in soil may offer a long -
term soil - based solution to the global
climate change problem.
It faces the
problems of the future
of the planet in
terms of climate change.»
P.S., In fresh article published in Iternational Herald Tribune (Global warming's PR
problem) Andrew C. Revkin gives comprehensive and intelligent account
of the
climate -
change media coverage which gives me some hope in
terms of the journalists understanding
of the
problem...
We provided them with statements from actual advocates using a variety
of «frames» to describe
climate change — as a national security
problem, as a business opportunity, as a secular moral issue, as a Christian moral issue, and in
terms of the environmental impact.
The working hypothesis is that even if the
climate system may have the possibility
of long -
term chaos, it is nonetheless more like William's example
of what happens when you
change a parameter
of the Lorentz model, than it is like the
problem of predicting a single day's weather a year ahead.
However, I see zero difference between the two groups in
terms of the actions they are taking to help alleviate the
climate change problem.
Part
of the
problem is semantic: «Abrupt» and «catastrophic» are inavoidably subjective
terms, although the former is a bit more prone to definition (e.g., any
change of climate state involving a rapid transition from one state to another, although
of course we then have to further define «rapid» and «
climate state»).
Basically, the
problem that the SGCR faced was that there does not seem to be an agency with the mission and expertise to be pushing for and guiding advancement
of social sciences dealing with sustainability and long -
term climate change.
In my opinion, a possible global
climate change - induced increase
of a percent or two here or there in the number
of tornadoes / hurricanes / * enter your favorite hazard here * is orders
of magnitude smaller (in
terms of a
problem) in comparison to vulnerability issues.
Again, the
problem is seizing on any short -
term variations in weather as evidence
of climate change.
But in Issues, analysts have identified a more fundamental
problem — the social cost
of carbon dioxide is the wrong guide to follow — and they proposed an alternative method that better reflects what is known about long -
term effects
of climate change and how these effects should be valued by today's decision - makers.
The Taskforce is comprised
of eminent scientists, business leaders, policy advisers and political leaders drawn from around the world.5 Its purpose is to recommend to all governments a framework for managing
climate change responses that is truly global, provides long -
term direction, and is genuinely responsive to the scale
of the
problem.
The biggest
problem with «writing off solar effects on
climate as insignificant», at the same time attributing most
of the recent
changes to AGW, is that it does not appear to stand up over the longer
term.
Yet in the global warming issue, we see instances where a major organization promoted the chairman
of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) as a Nobel laureate when he is not, and another organization similarly promoting a prominent IPCC scientist as a Nobel laureate when he is not, and the long -
term promotion
of book author Ross Gelbspan as a Pulitzer winner when he is not, a
problem first revealed long ago by Steve Milloy and expanded upon at this blog.
After five years
of referring to
climate change as a long -
term climate and humanitarian
problem, President Obama is trying a new strategy.
«But if doing these things has the tradeoff
of dampening the incentives for longer -
term innovation, there can be a real
problem, particularly when dramatic levels
of technological
change are needed, such as in the case
of stabilizing the global
climate.»
«In the INDCs [Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, or what countries will do to cut carbon emissions] they have submitted, more than 140 countries have said that land was part
of their solution or their
problem in
terms of climate change,» she points out.
From the administration that brought you «man - caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology
change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the
term «global
climate disruption» in place
of «global warming» — fearing the latter
term oversimplifies the
problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.
It is expected that consumers will be able to choose electricity from renewable sources instead
of fossil fuel - powered thermal (along with its
problems in
terms of climate change) or nuclear power generation (whose great risks again became evident with the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, caused by the tsunami after the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011).
In comparison to messages that defined
climate change in
terms of either the environment or national security, talking about
climate change as a public health
problem generated greater feelings
of hope among subjects.
The
Climate Change Science Program (CCSP), a joint federal program of the President's Committee on Climate Change Science and Technology Integration, has issued its strategic plan to address some of the most complex questions and problems dealing with long - term global climate variability and
Climate Change Science Program (CCSP), a joint federal program of the President's Committee on Climate Change Science and Technology Integration, has issued its strategic plan to address some of the most complex questions and problems dealing with long - term global climate variability and c
Change Science Program (CCSP), a joint federal program
of the President's Committee on
Climate Change Science and Technology Integration, has issued its strategic plan to address some of the most complex questions and problems dealing with long - term global climate variability and
Climate Change Science and Technology Integration, has issued its strategic plan to address some of the most complex questions and problems dealing with long - term global climate variability and c
Change Science and Technology Integration, has issued its strategic plan to address some
of the most complex questions and
problems dealing with long -
term global
climate variability and
climate variability and
changechange.
Essentially, solving the longer
term energy
problem — i.e. let's quit relying on buying fossil fuels from places that don't like us and extort money — also solves any CO2 emission
problem (if it exists) by default, meaning that
climate change is a secondary beneficiary and not a primary reason to do any
of these things.
To understand why natural gas combustion in the electricity sector is not likely be an adequate solution to
climate change in the long -
term, it is necessary to understand the scale
of the
problem facing the world.
Yet action to address the risk is complicated because
of what Wagner and Weitzman call the Big Four
problems: Any one country's effort to prevent
climate change alone would be ineffective; political systems struggle to address long -
term challenges; by the time humanity decides to act aggressively, it may be too late; and the risks are highly uncertain, which makes them easy to dismiss.
If
climate change fanatics are allowed to implement their policies, global population will continue to increase and overpopulation may become a real
problem — another example
of how the global warming hysterics are actually harming the long
term environment
of the earth by preventing overpopulated countries from developing and naturally lowering their birth levels.
It is like when Judith focuses on the lack
of money for stabilizing and modernizing our capacity for longer -
term weather prediction — by pointing to the money spent on studying
climate change — as if that were the
problem.
In
terms of advocates, and I don't think it's a
problem because
climate change is complicated.
Ultimately, he said, this becomes a
problem when the rate
of climate change velocity (how fast a region
changes put into a spatial
term) is faster than the rate that many organisms can migrate.
From Fox News From the administration that brought you «man - caused disaster» and «overseas contingency operation,» another terminology
change is in the pipeline.The White House wants the public to start using the
term «global
climate disruption» in place
of «global warming» — fearing the latter
term oversimplifies the
problem and makes it sound less dangerous than -LSB-...]
The authors point out that this may partly reflect a greater likelihood
of putting
terms like «
climate change» in the titles
of papers that dealt with narrow
problems.
In September, Blair announced that he had given up on
climate change treaties because, «The truth is, no country is going to cut its growth or consumption substantially in light
of a long -
term environmental
problem.»
Failing to Solve the
Climate Change Problem Ultimately Amounts to Child Abuse Of late, professionals in psychiatry, medicine, and the social sciences are beginning to publicly assert in no uncertain terms that a chronic failure by the adults in our society to remove or substantially reduce the existential threat of climate change amounts to nothing short of child
Climate Change Problem Ultimately Amounts to Child Abuse Of late, professionals in psychiatry, medicine, and the social sciences are beginning to publicly assert in no uncertain terms that a chronic failure by the adults in our society to remove or substantially reduce the existential threat of climate change amounts to nothing short of child
Change Problem Ultimately Amounts to Child Abuse
Of late, professionals in psychiatry, medicine, and the social sciences are beginning to publicly assert in no uncertain terms that a chronic failure by the adults in our society to remove or substantially reduce the existential threat of climate change amounts to nothing short of child abus
Of late, professionals in psychiatry, medicine, and the social sciences are beginning to publicly assert in no uncertain
terms that a chronic failure by the adults in our society to remove or substantially reduce the existential threat
of climate change amounts to nothing short of child abus
of climate change amounts to nothing short of child
climate change amounts to nothing short of child
change amounts to nothing short
of child abus
of child abuse.
Whether you (or Edim) personally want to worry about these things is up to you, my point is that there are plenty
of potential effects
of climate change which would not fall into the «abrupt and irreversible» category but could still cause big
problems if they occur, so just because the particular outcomes the IPCC classifies as such may not happen this century it doesn't logically mean we won't suffer serious impacts in the shorter
term.
Hopefully it comes as no great surprise to you that deforestation is a major
problem in many areas
of the world, both it
terms of preserving biodiversity and preventing
climate change — some countries are chopping down their forests at astonishing rates.
This suggests that the public view
climate change as more
of a long -
term problem than one to worry about now, Capstick says.
A: Things are happening fast enough now, in
terms of new opportunities, new technologies, new success stories, new
problems developing, new understandings
of climate change, and so forth.
Most Americans see
climate change as a distant
problem — distant from them in space (not here), in time (not yet) and in
terms of species (not us).
So while it may be theoretically possible to predict long - scale
climate changes, it may still be impossible to discern the true drivers
of these
climate systems amidst the chaos, making the long -
term prediction
problem moot.