The grey shading shows the uncertainty in the estimated long -
term rate of sea level change (Section 6.4.3).
Not exact matches
The long -
term average
rate of sea -
level rise in Hampton Roads is about one foot per century, but that pace has accelerated sharply recently, which makes it challenging to gauge future
rates of change.
Several previous analyses
of tide gauge records1, 2,3,4,5,6 — employing different methods to accommodate the spatial sparsity and temporal incompleteness
of the data and to constrain the geometry
of long -
term sea -
level change — have concluded that GMSL rose over the twentieth century at a mean
rate of 1.6 to 1.9 millimetres per year.
The physics part is that to first order, you expect the
rate of continental ice melt to increase with temperature, and also the
rate at which heat penetrates into the ocean below the mixed layer (for the mixed layer indeed we use a
term relating temperature to
sea level, not its
rate of rise).
Since the
rate of the
sea level raising is around 1 inch a year in sort
of a «bursts» — the long -
term will definitely be the one who poses less uncertainties, unlike the short -
term.
While the near -
term rate of sea -
level rise remains uncertain, the long -
term picture
of rising
seas in a warming world is crystal clear.
Schneider's approach to climate policy, comes up during a discussion
of the enduring uncertainty surrounding the most consequential aspects
of global warming, particularly the near -
term rate at which
sea levels will rise as ice sheets melt and seawater warms.
And they all assign large economic damage to
sea -
level rise — even though there is no observational evidence for an influence
of short -
term (decadal) temperature changes on the
rate of rise
of sea level.
Short period trends
of acceleration in mean
sea level after 1990 are evident at each site, although these are not abnormal or higher than other short -
term rates measured throughout the historical record.»
Satellite data, which manifest the highest short -
term rates of sea -
level rise (but also great measurement uncertainties) belie your extravagant claims: the current
rate is only 3.2 mm / year (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/
sea-
level/).
Over the 20th century, there was considerable decadal variation in the
rate of sea -
level rise but no long -
term trend.
A: «Internal variability versus anthropogenic forcing on
sea level and its components» B: «The
rate of sea -
level rise» C: «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric
sea level rise» D: «Detection and attribution
of global mean thermosteric
sea level change» E: «Long -
term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?»
Specifically, smoothing
sea -
level data (adjusting for natural variability
of ENSO) over the past century fits most closely with a 4th degree polynomial model, and there has very likely not been any slowing in the longer -
term background
rate of sea level rise over the period
of the tropospheric «pause».
Mr Lord said long -
term data gleaned from gauges in Sydney Harbour suggested
sea levels were rising at the
rate of about 1 mm per year.
4) Most
of the post-1950s
sea level rise is anthropogenic: «Internal Variability Versus Anthropogenic Forcing on Sea Level and Its Components» «The rate of sea - level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
sea level rise is anthropogenic: «Internal Variability Versus Anthropogenic Forcing on Sea Level and Its Components» «The rate of sea - level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
level rise is anthropogenic: «Internal Variability Versus Anthropogenic Forcing on
Sea Level and Its Components» «The rate of sea - level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
Sea Level and Its Components» «The rate of sea - level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
Level and Its Components» «The
rate of sea - level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
sea -
level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
level rise» «Quantifying anthropogenic and natural contributions to thermosteric
sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
sea level rise» «Detection and attribution of global mean thermosteric sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
level rise» «Detection and attribution
of global mean thermosteric
sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
sea level change» «Long - term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
level change» «Long -
term sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&raq
sea level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?&r
level trends: Natural or anthropogenic?»
The map
of regional mean
sea level trends provides an overview
of variations in the
rates of relative local mean
sea level observed at long -
term tide stations (based on a minimum
of 30 years
of data in order to account for long -
term sea level variations and reduce errors in computing
sea level trends based on monthly mean
sea level).
«However, Fig. 15 and the associated uncertainties discussed in Section 3.4 show that long
term estimates
of time variable
sea level acceleration in 203 year global reconstruction are significantly positive, which supports our previous finding (Jevrejeva et al., 2008a), that despite strong low frequency variability (larger than 60 years) the
rate of sea level rise is increasing with time.»
«long
term estimates
of time variable
sea level acceleration in 203 year global reconstruction are significantly positive, which supports our previous finding (Jevrejeva et al., 2008a), that despite strong low frequency variability (larger than 60 years) the
rate of sea level rise is increasing with time.»
It will also confirm the accelerated
rate of change for impacts such as
sea -
level rise, the steady retreat
of Arctic
sea ice and quickened melting
of ice sheets and glaciers, as well as offer more detail on scenarios that will shape international negotiations over both short -
term and long -
term greenhouse gas emissions, including how long «business as usual» can be sustained without dangerous risk.
From what I understand about things like the viscosity
of water & gravity, the actual
rate of sea -
level rise can't vary between locations on any long -
term basis.
An ~ 100kyr periodicity in fast - spreading seafloor bathymetry, and relatively low present - day eruption
rates, at a time
of high
sea -
level and decreasing orbital eccentricity suggest a longer
term sensitivity to
sea -
level and orbital variations associated with Milankovitch cycles.
Last August, I wrote about what that near -
term worse case scenario might look like: Should its melt
rate continue to trend above previous estimates, Antarctica may produce an extra foot
of sea level rise by 2100, which would pose a threat to low - lying coastal areas worldwide.
Some further insights into longer
term OHC variability can be inferred from this figure from the AR5 on
rates of sea level rise: