Sentences with phrase «term returns over time»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

«As a long - term value investor, we remain cautious and recognise that to generate good real returns over time, we have to be prepared for periods of underperformance relative to the market indices, some even for a stretch of several years.»

The point was to show how much variation in performance there's been historically over shorter time frames compared with a much narrower range in long - term returns.

Cash alternatives, such as money market funds, typically offer lower rates of return than longer - term equity or fixed - income securities and may not keep pace with inflation over extended periods of time.

Even in retirement, the potential return from stocks over time is more likely to outpace inflation when compared to the long - term returns from cash or bonds, according to the Wells Fargo report.

In the face of speculative noise, the long - term returns from a proper discounting approach may not capture as much speculative return as might be possible, but over time, many of those speculative swings tend to wash out anyway.

That difference may be positive or negative and therefore represents our largest source of risk, but over time, it has also represented the primary source of long - term Fund returns.

With no clear return benefit over time, the key aim for many long - term investors is to reduce volatility.

«We would rather earn a fair return and grow our businesses long term than try to maximize our profit over any one time period.»

As such, we encourage the Committee to also devote time and attention to several issues that will help ensure the long - term stability of the individual market, including: Section 1332 waivers under the ACA; long - term stability funding; limiting third - party premium payments; and returning to the states more regulatory authority over the individual and small group markets.

As the value of the digital currency swings over a period of time, the potential for returns in the short - as well as the long - term is immense.

Dan Caplinger: One surprising area that has been extremely lucrative for long - term investors is the auto - parts industry, and, among its major players, AutoZone (NYSE: AZO) has scored impressive returns over the past decade, seeing its stock price rise from less than $ 100 to almost $ 700 over that time span.

Through volatile markets it's important to take a long - term perspective and remember that market returns are driven by economic and earnings growth over time, and both appear positive, in our view.

We continue to do our best to optimize the returns of the Fund by purchasing undervalued companies that are growing their intrinsic value over time and that are managed by individuals who think and act like long - term owners of the business.

There are no rules because asset price moves carry on for unpredictable amounts of time, even if they do tend to return to the mean over the long term.

Averages don't lie but they can mislead Indeed, while long - term averages show stocks have generally delivered positive returns and provided investors with the greatest opportunity for gains over long periods of time, they fail to reveal the large variations within any year and from one year to another.

Looking back through history, whenever value stocks have gotten this cheap, subsequent long - term returns have generally been strong.3 From current depressed valuation levels, value stocks have in the past, on average, doubled over the next five years.4 Not that we necessarily expect returns of this magnitude this time around, but based on the data and our six decades of experience investing through various market cycles, we believe the current risk / reward proposition is heavily skewed in favor of long - term value investors.

For longer - term investors, consider the prospective return you can expect to achieve over time if you are buying, and that you can expect to forego if you are selling.

I've noted before that day - to - day returns can't be controlled, so a «good day» for me is one where I take actions that I believe will produce good results over time (such as buying high ranked candidates on short - term weakness, selling lower ranked holding on short - term strength, and aligning our exposure to market fluctuations with the prevailing Market Climate).

And we will do our best to optimize the returns of the Oakmark Global Fund by purchasing undervalued companies that are growing their intrinsic value over time and that are managed by individuals who think and act like long - term owners of the business.

As you add money to your invested funds over time, your risk gets amplified such that a negative return in later years will cost you more in absolute dollar terms than in earlier years.

So today people are confessing that Szczesny is better than Ospina.It was funny how it was made to look Szczesny was the cause of Arsenal's goals because of his mistakes.People also forget the kind of defence he's had in front of him from the time he started till he went on loan.I can't believe anyone watches Ospina and Szczesny in terms of goal keeping ability and says Ospina is better.When Ospina first came he was also making the same mistakes Szczesny made but some ignored it insisting he was better.I'd like to see Ospina go to AS Roma and do better than Szczesny.Even Juventus are in for him even if their bid is derisory.Some also said the fact that Ospina had a cool head over Szczesny meant he should start over him.If you've watched Ospina and Szczesny well from a neutral point and not being bias you'll clearly know who's better.If I was Szczesny I won't return because I'm in my prime.

- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade

This process clearly involves more by the farmer (investment, time, etc) on the front end, but may provide a higher return over the long term.

MKL is on my great company watchlist, and if it falls to book value or below, it's likely to be an outstanding long term investment that will allow shareholder returns to match or exceed book value growth over time.

But over time the index funds played a bigger role and when you look at the long term return, the index funds win hands down.

Seeks to generate strong relative returns over a long - term time horizon by investing in companies across the market cap spectrum with strong and / or improving financial productivity at attractive valuations.

In the next post of this series, we will show the actual outperformance of the S&P SmallCap 600 versus the Russell 2000 over the long term, the higher returns and lower risk over different time periods, and through different bull and bear market cycles.

Special Versus Standard Rates When you compare CD rate from Wells Fargo or any other financial institution, it is important to remember that the rate of return and the other terms associated with the CDs can change periodically over time.

Someday I will probably switch over to long term quality, but the driver will be reducing the amount of time I spend per day on investing and not maximizing my return.

Unlike long - term investments, which can yield a greater return over time, short - term investments are typically lower - risk investments with a predictable, smaller return and highly liquid assets, such as a high - yield savings account.

When valuations are reasonable, investors can expect satisfactory long - term returns simply on the basis of the stream of cash flows they receive over time.

For example, Canadian and U.S. stocks are unlikely to have the exact same long - term rate of return, but over the last four decades they were pretty close, so rebalancing between these two asset classes should not cause a significant drag over time.

Although stocks can return well over the long run, in short or immediate term, they may well be outperformed by bonds, especially at certain times in the economic cycle.

Hormel's corporate culture is all about long - term profit maximization, which has allowed it to generate strong, consistent, and growing margins and returns on shareholder capital over time.

Using one of the top index ETFs with an expense ratio as long as 0.10 % yields enormous benefits in terms of total return over a prolonged period of time.

The $ 102,000 investment in a four - year college yields a rate of return of 15.2 percent per year — more than double the average return over the last 60 years experienced in the stock market (6.8 percent), and more than five times the return to investments in corporate bonds (2.9 percent), gold (2.3 percent), long - term government bonds (2.2 percent), or housing (0.4 percent).

While there are no guarantees of course, over time we would expect the currency impact on the long term returns of our Funds, whether hedged or unhedged, to be de minimis, as it has proven to be in the past.

It has a long term objective to target a real return above Australian inflation with an emphasis on risk taken in recognition that investors prefer relatively stable returns over time.

With no clear return benefit over time, the key aim for many long - term investors is to reduce volatility.

Monte Carlo analysis recognizes that long - term rates of return may be relatively predictable (e.g., stocks tend to return 10 % over time), but the year - to - year results are not.

A study Barry Feldman and Dhruv Roy, cleraly shows the BXM Index (CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index), a benchmark for an S&P 500 - based covered call strategy, had slightly higher returns and significantly less volatility than the S&P 500 over a time period of almost 16 years, despite the fact that covered calls have a truncated upside in the short term.

«When you're invested for the long term, your average return becomes much more stable over time and it's less likely that you'll lose money.

Dear Gourav, When you're invested for the long term, your average return becomes much more stable over time and it's less likely that you'll lose money.

It's also an excellent long term wealth building strategy that provides broad diversification (depending on the index the fund tracks) that is aimed at maximizing your returns over time.

So both the rate of return, and the length of compounding have enormous leverage in creating future wealth.Simply stated, if your goal is to accumulate a significant amount of wealth during your lifetime, you must first save something, and then exercise some amount of control over one of two factors: your long - term rate of return, or the time horizon T over which you compound your wealth.

Since these investments like ETFs are often considered as long term investments, that's to say I have to leave them there for a long period of time, over how many years usually will I start to see returns breaking even with insurance companies» claimed 3.25 % -5 % returns?

The total return of a security, or in this case the index, refers to the gain or loss, in percentage terms, derived from both the price change as well as any income the investment pays over a specific time period.

Wonderful companies compound wealth over time, while fair companies may have short - term gains but lack the deep competitive advantage required to fend off competition and generate above average returns for decades.

But with stock valuations stretched and the Federal Reserve expected to hike short - term interest rates three times over the coming year, experts warn that we could be in for significantly lower returns in the years ahead.