Sentences with phrase «term scenarios do»

Worst - case short - term scenarios do not come as a surprise to valuation - informed investors.

Not exact matches

And on the US side, those tariffs were not placed on consumer goods, which would have a more material impact and from a market perspective, we do see quite a lot priced in, in terms of our downside scenario, as it relates to trade.

In a best - case scenario, see what you can do to make all of these relationships mutually beneficial to encourage long - term success and satisfaction.

«I have a tough time in any near - term or any medium - term sort of scenario seeing that robots are just going to do their own thing and decide to shoot each other without any interaction [or] human control.»

He can see a scenario where CI buys back its own shares, but to do that it will have to use up its short - term investment balance of $ 95 million and its undrawn credit facility of $ 250.

In terms of the economy, the best case scenario is that faith in our banks does not deteriorate and this bank evolves into a more normal bank.

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

This scenario doesn't really bode well in terms of you getting your money back.

Your scenario 1 is precisely what you'd do to work out the real return of equities if their results were reported in nominal terms.

And that is a nightmare scenario because the primary corporate objective of the typical Vancouver promoter lies not in the realm of a new gold discovery or near - term cash flow or added reserves, but rather in the novel concept of «distribution» and by that I don't refer to the «distribution» of profits to shareholders by way of dividends but rather the distribution of the one - cent paper they manufactured when they put the shell together.

Nevertheless, even if the best scenario does not play out, we at least want to see some type of bullish reversal candle before buying because it would confirm near - term momentum has returned to the bulls.

At first glance it seems to be a Romney nightmare scenario: Which leads to Romney's nightmare scenario: If things don't turn around for Romney soon, those super PACs may give up on the task of electing Romney as president and turn to the task of encircling Obama's second term with a....

And if you don't, so that according to Berry's own terms most communities will remain basically subject to the market even in the wildest scenarios of Porcher victory, you can not seriously talk of getting beyond Lockean liberalism, nor talk so critically of it that it appears «getting beyond» is an option.

This isn't a case of «what have you done for me lately» as that would imply that things went off the rails fairly recently, and it's certainly not a change simply for the sake of change scenario, as we're not so naive to believe that this alone would guarantee long - term success, this is a measured response based on YEARS of questionable decisions, failed tactics, boardroom blunders, unprecedented losses and a level of dishonesty never before seen at our club.

Both scenarios put him in position to dictate terms on the field as oppose to be confined to what his play caller wants to do.

Short of James getting a long - term injury, I do not see any scenario in which Bayern does not buy him.

Despite our recent improvement this scenario seems very unlikely, and if we can get anywhere close to our halfway points total last term then we will have done well.

Worst - case scenario: A charter school doesn't meet performance standards, and by terms of the contract, is relatively quickly closed.

Well, because for starters the iPad mini costs a good deal more at Rs 21,900 and when one does a head - to - head comparison in terms of specs, the Nexus 7 comes out in front in most of the scenarios.

Since we do not expect RBI to cut interest rates, in this scenario, returns from liquid funds might improve over the last year and it could become a better surrogate to fixed deposits for short term savers.

You are presented with an identical investment scenario, so you do some quick calculations and determine taking the short - term profit would cost you $ 280, while waiting for the long - term rate to take effect creates a tax liability of 15 % x $ 2,000, or $ 300.

At a 10 - year Treasury yield of 1.7 %, interest on reserves of 0.25 %, and a monetary base now at about 18 cents per dollar of nominal GDP (see Run, Don't Walk), further purchases of long - term Treasury securities by the Fed would produce net losses for the Fed in any scenario where yields rise more than about 20 basis points a year, or the Fed ever has to unwind any portion of its already massive positions.

In all but the shortest - term scenarios, if you're living somewhere that you don't own, you have a lease.

At levels like that future market outcomes are poor under almost every historical scenario, and even if the market doesn't seem nuts in terms of qualitative signals, the amount you leave on the table is piddly over a 10 - year horizon.

You could even argue that in a liquidation scenario the deferred income tax liability would disappear since the company would record massive losses if all long term assets would be valued at zero (which you do when you look at just NCAV).

The negative cash flows would be caused due to an adverse industry scenario (long term shift in industry), or an aggressive investment strategy which does not give sufficient ROI.

In this scenario, we find that wealth does grow, albeit slowly in real terms.

In this scenario, an investor who met their qualifications would be guaranteed a commission free portfolio as long as the terms and conditions of their commission structure did not change.

Also, do invest in the Debt Short Term / Long term funds as they will shine due to the current financial scenaTerm / Long term funds as they will shine due to the current financial scenaterm funds as they will shine due to the current financial scenario.

If you take the mean of the returns of this scenario, and the scenario where no emergencies occur, in the long - term you will do much better by following the moneystepper approach.

I certainly don't mean any offense, I just think that the fact almost any mixed breed dog can be labeled «pit bull» &, in attack scenarios, this leads to the further prejudices against the breed (or breeds) that the term typically encompasses.

Although CAOTD is too similar to its predecessor in terms of gameplay and scenarios, it goes above and beyond most other games that were given a facelift during the transition from DOS to Windows.

In none of your model scenarios involving realistic near - term Carbon releases (1000 gigatonnes or less, based on the consideration that the 1990 - 1999 release is estimated in IPCC TAR to be 6.3 gigatonnes per year) does more than 20 % of the injected CO2 remain in the atmosphere for 1000 years.

Pacala and Socolow (2004) assumed a baseline scenario and then characterized what we need to do in terms of departure from that baseline.

A more likely scenario if we do nothing is that emissions will continue at a rapid pace as oil from sand and shale plus coal substantially replace oil and natural gas, with the consequence that we will have dug ourselves into a deeper hole in terms of having sufficient resources to reduce emissions sufficiently without major disruption to our society.

He did flag that he was using RCP8.5 projections, which are the highest emissions trajectory of the 4 scenarios developed for AR5 (comparable to A2 scenario in IPCC AR4, which has the highest CO2 emissions in the near - term if I understand it correctly).

Unfortunately, the figure also confirms that the spatial resolution of theoutput from the GCMs used in the Mediterranean study is too coarse for constructing detailed regional scenarios.To develop more detailed regional scenarios, modelers can combine the GCM results with output from statistical models.3 This is done by constructing a statistical model to explain the observed temperature or precipitation at a meteorological station in terms of a range of regionally - averaged climate variables.

When I wrote # 104 I did not realize that the issue of «Hansen's favorite» had broader implications in terms of which scenarios were being used in IPCC composite projections.

So long term trends act as negative feedback on CO2 levels, and therefore your physically impossible scenario is impossible indeed and has nothing to do with my writings or opinions in any way.

As far as CO2 production goes, we have vastly exceeded the expectation of scenario B (which does not include the crazy CFC growth) in terms of CO2 production, and yet the ppm count in the atmosphere is slightly lower than what Hansen would have been expecting from capped growth with flat consumption after 2000 (if I remember scenario 2 correctly).

I think maybe the best - case scenario in terms of what this is going to look like is that progressives do a much better job of connecting the dots between climate change, economic inequality, a shredded safety net, a political program that has waged decades of war not only on the idea of bold climate action but on the idea of investing in a serious way in the public sphere, really connecting the dots.

«warming in the pipeline» usually assumes constant concentrations, not zero emissions (though if CO2 emissions were dropped to zero tomorrow, and all other emissions were held constant, I'd probably expect a little bit of warming before it turned over and started dropping) 2) Don't forget aerosols: they are following the Level 1 scenario from Wigley et al. 2009, and may actually dominate short - term temperature trends.

However, the 2009 pledge did not specify the BAU emissions scenario, making the pledge opaque in terms of where national emissions were heading.

Lower emission scenarios show significant advantages in terms of minimizing impacts on AW but do not eliminate these impacts altogether.

«Scientists were quick to declare the results of the Turner et al paper, which covered 1 per cent of the Antarctic continent, did not negate a long - term warming because of man - made climate change... «Climate model projections forced with medium emission scenarios indicate the emergence of a large anthropogenic regional warming signal, comparable in magnitude to the late - 20th - century peninsula warming, during the latter part of the current century,» the Turner research concluded.»

Reducing the UK's carbon emissions by around 60 % by 2030 (as recommended by the CCC) would: * increase UK GDP by 1.1 % in net terms * result in at least 190,000 additional jobs being created across the UK economy * mean households are financially better off compared to a scenario where little is done to reduce emissions.

The World Energy Council monitors the issues shaping the global energy agenda every year while offering an understanding of what energy resources are available, how national energy and climate policies use them and what do energy scenarios hold in the long term future.

You might have noticed that Hansen includes several alternative scenarios with substantially less radical reductions in carbon that all result in temperature tracks that not only do not approach +2 deg, but also have temperatures declining in the medium term.

And while the above scenarios will definitely help in terms of determining guilt, doing so can be much trickier depending on the situation.

If your appeal does not work (a more common scenario), and the insurer keeps claiming that you are not qualified for short - term or long - term disability benefits under the disability test, your only recourse is to sue the insurance company in court.