It's time that people start paying a lot more attention to this pattern of a disconnect between short
term test score gains and long term life outcomes.
For our purposes, what it shows is that short -
term test score gains don't lead to long -
term test score gains, but they do lead to long - term success.
Not exact matches
A less narrow concept of school quality (currently limited to short -
term gains in
test scores alone) is essential to refocus the movement on its ultimate object: setting children on a path for lives of self - sufficiency, upward mobility, and engaged citizenship.
Second, even in the absence of such behaviors, the correlation between
test -
score gains and improvements in long -
term outcomes has not been conclusively established.
In other words, programs can yield long -
term benefits without raising
test scores, and
test -
score gains are no guarantee that impacts will persist over time.
Studies of early - childhood and school - age interventions often find long -
term impacts on such outcomes as educational attainment, earnings, and criminal activity despite nonexistence or «fade - out» of
test -
score gains.
These strong long -
term outcomes — which tend to be much more significant than any short -
term test -
score gains — likely reflect Catholic schools» focus on discipline and character as much as their excellent academics.
Each student's
score also is analyzed in
terms of year - to - year
gains and compared to
test norms.
Last week, I argued that Hitt, McShane, and Wolf erred in including programs in their review of «school choice» studies that were only incidentally related to school choice or that have idiosyncratic designs that would lead one to expect a mismatch between
test score gains and long -
term impacts (early college high schools, selective enrollment high schools, and career and technical education initiatives).
Unfortunately, no excuses charters don't seem to produce long -
term benefits that are commensurate with their huge
test score gains.
That yielded short -
term test -
score gains, which were related to positive long -
term outcomes.
To
test for this possibility, we compared the
gains made by F schools with the performance of an even smaller subset of schools whose 2002
test scores were similar but had never received an F (which we
termed low - performing non-F schools).
The impacts of school choice programs on
test score gains and longer
term outcomes are not really as out of sync as they may first appear.
Those benefits included short -
term gains on
test scores as well as higher college - going rates and higher early - career earnings.
On the other end of the scale are programs that appear to be failures when judged by short -
term test -
score gains, but that produce impressive long -
term results for their participants.
For example, research on a privately funded school voucher program in New York City provides some evidence in favor of a link existing between
test scores and longer -
term outcomes, where vouchers raised
test score gains and increased the likelihood of graduating from high school and enrolling in college.
Mike Petrilli:
Test Score Gains Predict Long -
Term Outcomes, So We Shouldn't Be Too Shy About Using Them
There are therefore several things to think about as we further explore the AEI study: long
term outcomes do indeed matter a lot, especially for poor kids; if large
test -
score gains don't eventually translate into improved long
term outcomes, it is a legitimate cause for concern; and we must stay open to the possibility that some programs could help kids immensely over the long haul, even if they don't immediately improve student achievement.
The question is whether a
test score gain in a given year of schooling represents growth in skills that matter over the long
term.
A growing number of people, including both school choice advocates and education reform opponents, say there's little evidence that standardized
test score gains in math and reading lead to improved long -
term life outcomes.
A recent report delivered to the Brookings Institute clearly warns of the danger of misidentifiying «good» and «bad» schools on the basis of short -
term test - score gains (Lynn Olson, «Study Questions Reliability of Single - Year Test Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001:
test -
score gains (Lynn Olson, «Study Questions Reliability of Single - Year Test Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001
score gains (Lynn Olson, «Study Questions Reliability of Single - Year Test Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001
gains (Lynn Olson, «Study Questions Reliability of Single - Year
Test Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001:
Test Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001
Score Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001
Gains,» Education Week, 23 May 2001: 9).
Colorado students in 2014 took slight steps backward on the small academic
gains made on standardized
tests in recent years, part of a long -
term trend of flat
scores, results released Thursday show.
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, a rigorous long -
term study found that TEP produced major achievement impacts, including
test score gains equal to an additional 1.6 years of school in math, with significant
gains in science and English.
She was credited with greatly improving
test scores in Washington, D.C. schools, but this accomplishment was cast into doubt by a USA Today investigation that suggested that
test score gains during her
term may have been the result of cheating on the part of school officials.
At the same time, it became clear that the
gains on
test scores weren't necessarily adding up to long -
term success for students.
Although I left the field over ten years ago for numerous reasons, I
gained valuable experience with many transferable skills, such as presenting in - services, working with other professionals in a team environment, report writing, communication with families, administering and
scoring diagnostic
tests, setting short and long
term goals.