Not exact matches
Thank you for anyone who has the courage to apologize — the one thing I'd ask moving forward is that you don't qualify your apology by citing what the survivor of emergent abuse (I like this
term better
than victim) did or did not do — as we've noted before, when someone is in the throes of prolonged abuse and trauma, they will do / say things in response that will seem somewhat «batshit crazy.»
It's admirable that Biden is speaking out for the
victims of sexual abuse, but resorting to insults and threats of violence seems more like (potentially dangerous) posturing
than offering real long -
term terms solutions to the problems highlighted by the #MeToo moment.
There are a number of places where Christ or His actions are described in sacrificial
terms, [4] but the title «Priest» is never given, and generally these passages emphasise Christ's role as
victim more
than priest.
I am (a) A
victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape
victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in
terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more
than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.
Victims of large sets of sociological inequities - different opportunities in
terms of education, employment and property among other things - women globally have lower perspectives
than men.
A) the new players aren't good enough to be better
than the sum of their parts and MP isn't able to overcome lack of talent on scheme alone, tanking the season; or B) The Lions are
victims of their own success, where the cheap bit players that MP has schemed in find more money elsewhere due to improved stats, and we're stuck playing roulette on cheap, short -
term guys again.
It frames its work using loaded
terms such as the provision of relief to «
victims», rather
than minimally as the alleviation of suffering, and it calls for policy change.
Cuomo's counsel, Alphonso David, late Monday night released a statement expressing the gov's «full confidence» in Bill Mulrow, Jim Malatras and Andrew Kennedy,
terming all three as «nothing more
than victims or witnesses to a potential crime.»
In May researchers at McGill University reported that the gene responsible for creating cells» protein - building machinery is more frequently methylated in the hippocampus — the brain region responsible for short -
term memory and spatial navigation — of depressed suicide
victims who suffered child abuse
than in the brains of nonsuicide
victims who were not abused.
The National Centre Against Bullying (NCAB) counsels describing bullying behaviour (e.g. «bullying student», «target of bullying») rather
than labelling young people — perhaps permanently — with the emotive
terms «bully» and «
victim» (see also Espelage & Swearer, 2003).
What he finds, among the forgotten mines and decrepit barracks of former gulags, is a world relegated to oblivion, where it is easier to ignore both the
victims and the executioners
than to come to
terms with a terrible past.
Other
than the immediate medical costs,
victims may require long
term therapy and rehabilitation, not to mention the emotional stress and being unable to attend work.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC —
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result
victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted
victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year
term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by
victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion
than as stated by
victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim — Having provided reasons for accepting
victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding res
victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.
Typically, the long -
term care needs of the
victim of a catastrophic injury are much greater
than an individual who has suffered a less - severe injury.
Other
than the immediate medical costs,
victims may require long
term therapy and rehabilitation, not to mention the mental stress and being unable to attend work.
The average figure for the average traffic accident
victim's emergency and long -
term treatment and hospitalization was more
than $ 57,000.
Other
than the immediate medical expenses,
victims may require long
term therapy and rehabilitation, not to mention the mental stress and being unable to attend work.
The «average» accident
victim ran up emergency and long -
term treatment and hospitalization costs of more
than $ 57,000, but for plenty of accident
victims, the costs are far higher.
They will distinguish those failed firms as aberrations borne of mismanagement, rather
than as
victims of pervasive trends that persist, including: undervaluing collegiality and cohesiveness as vital to long - run stability, mistaking growth for the sake of growth as a long -
term strategic plan, and indulging their confirmation bias as they wait for some other firm to fail because they're certain it wo n`t be theirs.»
With more
than three decades of legal experience, we understand the devastating long -
term effects that can result from traumatic injuries, and we know how critically - important it is for accident
victims to recover just compensation.
Perhaps, rather
than cultivating the unpronounceable Icelandic word as a
term to abuse others, unlucky
victims may find better solace in something more reflective; perhaps «Eye full o» yoghurt»?
42 U.S. Code § 13001a (7) the
term «multidisciplinary response to child abuse» means a response to child abuse that is based on mutually agreed upon procedures among the community agencies and professionals involved in the intervention, prevention, prosecution, and investigation systems that best meets the needs of child
victims and their nonoffending family members; (8) the
term «nonoffending family member» means a member of the family of a
victim of child abuse other
than a member who has been convicted or accused of committing an act of child abuse; and (Pub.