Often, employers try to limit their employees»
termination notice periods to the minimum entitlements under the Employment Standards Act («ESA»).
Once you have the date, diarise to give yourself plenty of time to look around as
the termination notice period can be from 30 days to a year.
Employers operating in Ontario who «draw the circle» around employee rights and entitlements on termination should carefully review and ensure that their contractual termination clause complies with all aspects of statutory minimum standards, and in particular: (a) notice or pay in lieu, (b) benefits continuation during the notice period, (c) severance pay, if applicable, and (d) continued vacation accrual during
the termination notice period.
Employers will be prohibited from forcing employees to use entitlements such as vacation or overtime during
a termination notice period, unless agreed to by both parties.
Two disabled employees who were unable to work during
a termination notice period were recently provided with written notice of termination under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 («ESA»), rather than termination pay.
Employers will be able to pay out an employee tendering their resignation by providing the employee with wages the employee would have earned if the employee had worked until the earlier end of
the termination notice period the employee provided or the end of
the termination notice period that the employer would have been required to give the employee.
Currently, where an employee provides more notice than required and an employer wants to pay out the employee, the employer must provide pay in lieu to the end of
the termination notice period that the employer would have been required to give the employee.
Employers would be prohibited from forcing employees to use entitlements such as vacation or overtime during
a termination notice period, unless agreed to by both parties.
Not exact matches
The letter asks each employee to acknowledge that they have received the «Separation Letter», which outlines the terms and conditions surrounding the
termination of their employment with Target Canada and provides information on benefit coverage and the payment of regular wages throughout the
notice period.
You may also terminate your Premium Membership at any time, for any reason, effective from the first payment
period after our receipt of your written
notice of
termination, provided you are not in an initial signup
period, in which case you will be charged for the entire amount of the initial signup
period.
Trial
Period is subject to change at any time and / or is subject to early
termination without
notice.
The 10 bill payments must be successfully completed and payment posted to your account within the promotional
period to qualify Offer subject to change or
termination without prior
notice at the Bank's discretion.
4.3 Once
notice of
termination has been given, Members may not redeem Points for any flights scheduled to depart after the
notice period expires.
Upon
termination of the Programme at the end of such
notice period, all Flying Club rights of all Members against VAA will cease and, in particular, Miles shall cease to be exchangeable for Rewards or otherwise redeemable.
Koch Media may terminate any Koch Media games, websites and / or services at any time by giving you
notice of such
termination within the time
period specified when you joined the particular Koch Media service, or if no time
period for
notice of
termination was specified, then within thirty (30) days of the date such
notice is posted on the applicable Koch Media game, websites and / or service.
2 (2) In the event we wish to terminate your employment without just cause, we agree that we will give you
notice of the
termination of your employment, or at our absolute discretion, we will pay you, in lieu of such
notice, a severance payment equal to the wages only that you would have received during the applicable
notice period.
Any government party can terminate the agreement, but the
notice period for
termination by the federal government is much longer (18 months) than that by a province (6 months).
The language of the contractual
termination clause violated the statute because it set out an exhaustive summary of what the plaintiff was to receive upon
termination — «drawing the circle» around the employee's
termination entitlements — but failing to provide for benefits continuation during the statutory
notice period.
In Apacheta Corp. v. Lincare, Inc., Apacheta sued for breach of contract in claiming that Lincare's
termination violated the right - to - cure provision because Lincare neither provided
notice of breach nor a cure
period.
The defendant did not disagree that two weeks
notice of
termination was insufficient, but the parties were unable to agree on what the reasonable
notice period should have been.
Where there is no written employment contract restricting rights at
termination or the employment contract is void because it is in breach of the ESA, the appropriate
notice period can be much greater than the minimums set out under the ESA.
Suppliers are failing to make auto - rollover clauses clear up front (24 %), tying businesses into lengthy
notice periods (22 %), charging high early
termination fees (20 %) and concealing details in small print (20 %).
Remember that even if an employee does not suffer mental distress, a trial judge might extend the
period of reasonable
notice if an employer advances grounds for
termination that reduce the availability of alternate equivalent employment — a step taken by the trial judge which was undisturbed by the Court of Appeal.
The judge was apparently influenced by the fact that the plaintiff remained unemployed for 30 months following
termination, a fact which is generally considered as irrelevant to the fixing of the
notice period.
The main factor driving that relatively lengthy
notice period was the «public» reasons RBC gave for Mr. Lau's
termination, which made it more difficult for Mr. Lau to find replacement employment.
After an employee announced his intention to resign his job 11 months later, his employer decided to terminate his employment before the announced
termination date, deciding that the
notice of resignation
period was too long.
Some of the changes being proposed with respect to the Employment Standards Code include: the introduction of new unpaid, job - protected leaves, decreased eligibility thresholds for existing unpaid, job - protected leaves, increasing the rate at which overtime may be banked, changes to the eligibility and calculation of overtime in the context of compressed work weeks, the introduction of additional employee rest
periods, changes to the eligibility and calculation of general holiday pay, amendments to youth employment, the introduction of additional
notice requirements in the context of group
termination notices, and new enforcement tools to deal with non-compliant employers, including introduction of an administrative penalty system.
While the Court concluded that signing a written employment agreement the day after the employee commenced work did not render the agreement unenforceable, it found that the
termination clause contained in the employment agreement improperly excluded the employee's minimum statutory entitlement to benefits continuation during the
notice period.
The Ontario Court of Appeal held that an employer's conduct upon
termination or during the
notice period can not remedy an otherwise illegal and unenforceable
termination clause.
For both parties, pre-determining the
period of
notice avoids the need for litigation to assess
notice upon
termination.
Applying the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Asphalte Desjardins inc., the Tribunal administratif du travail recalled that an employer that shortens the
period of work announced in the
notice of
termination given by an employee is in fact breaking the contract of employment unilaterally.
Where a
termination clause calls for pay in lieu of
notice, but does not provide for the payment of benefits during the
notice period, the entire clause is void as contrary to the Employment Standards Act, 2000.
The plaintiff rejected the
notice offered on
termination and brought an action for wrongful dismissal, seeking a greater
notice period as well as the payment of benefits during that
period.
Termination pay is payment in lieu, meaning an employer can and often does insist that an employee work for the
notice period.
In McLeod v. 1274458 Ontario Inc., the Superior Court of Justice determined that an employee who was incapable of working when he received
notice of
termination was entitled to damages representing the salary he would have earned had he worked during the
notice period.
A first communication interrupting the limitation
period was sent by the Agent on October 18, 2011 (one day before the expiration of the first year after the
termination notice) claiming for the clientele and damages compensations.
For the Court of Appeal, the
termination clause's wording excluded and contracted out of the obligation to continue making benefits contributions during the
notice period.
She argued that the
termination clause excludes FDI's statutory obligation to make benefits contributions during the
notice period and it does not satisfy FDI's statutory obligation to pay severance pay.
The Court further concluded that the employment income which Ms. Brake earned during her statutory
notice entitlement
period was not deductible as mitigation income, reasoning that statutory entitlements (
termination and severance pay) are not damages and that employees are entitled to receipt of these statutory entitlements whether or not they secure new employment during the
period they are intended to cover.
While the Court acknowledge that an employer's poor financial circumstances might be the reason for
termination, it is not relevant to the determination of reasonable
notice in a particular case: «they justify neither a reduction in the
notice period in bad times nor an increase when times are good.»
The Court first established that the reasonable
notice period must be segmented into the statutory
notice period on the one hand, which starts to run from the date of
termination, and the balance of the reasonable
notice period on the other.
Wood argued that the clause excluded Deeley's statutory obligation to contribute to her benefit plans during the
notice period and did not clearly require Deeley to pay severance pay upon
termination.
For its part, Ainsworth, the employer, argued that he had been given 15 months» working
notice of
termination and, if he found new employment during that time, he would be taken to have resigned and Ainsworth's only remaining financial obligation would be to «top up» his income for the remainder of the
notice period if it was lower than his income at Ainsworth.
First, the Court found the
termination clause excluded Deeley's obligation to contribute to Wood's benefit plan during the ESA
notice period.
[102] Therefore the proper question to ask with regard to measuring damages in cases of without cause dismissal is not What did the plaintiff lose for the
notice period as a result of the
termination?
For example, does the employment or severance agreement provide for
notice of
termination, is there a cure
period, and other formalities which need to be followed?
The probation
period only applies with respect to one's entitlements to
notice of
termination under the Employment Standards Act.
Does the contract stipulate the
period of
notice or compensation in lieu of
notice that must be provided at the time of
termination and, if so, does the
termination clause meet the minimum requirements prescribed under Ontario's Employment Standards Act?
(The length of
notice must be 1) the
notice required under any law relating to
termination of employees, 2) the
period required for a standard landlord / tenant
termination, or 3) a week, whichever is longest.
Before the decision in Brake, Ontario law provided that all income earned during the
notice period, irrespective of its nature, was deductible from the
termination pay owed.