Not exact matches
Plaintiff hereby consents to a judgment
against him and in favor of the United States Department of Education in the amount of $ 4,800.00 as of December 3, 2012, This consent judgment is subject the
terms set forth below.
A judgment is a legal
term used when a
plaintiff files and wins a civil lawsuit
against a defendant.
The
plaintiff, however, argued that several aspects of the arbitration agreement were invalid because enforcing the
terms went
against good public policy.
Robert Kalanda on Supreme Court of Canada Narrowly Rules Facebook's Jurisdiction Clause Unenforceable Robert blogs on the 4 - 3 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that Facebook could not enforce a jurisdiction clause in its
terms of use
against the
plaintiff.
[99] I reject the Defendants» argument that by abandoning their defence to the Counterclaim, the Edwards
Plaintiffs are thereby disentitled to argue
against the Defendants» claim for indemnification for costs based on the
terms of the VIA.
He tried a suit
against Fayette County Long
Term Care which resulted in a $ 1.5 million judgment for the
plaintiff.
However, in Gillis v. Eagleson, the stay of the civil suit was ordered on
terms designed to safeguard the
plaintiff's rights — i.e., that in exchange for a deferral of the civil case
against him, Eagleson would have to pay into court $ 40,000 (in 1995, U.S. dollars).
One of the documents to the contract set out a number of
terms which limited the liability of the defendant as
against the
plaintiff for a wide variety of issues, including delay in construction.
Recently, a
plaintiff's purported class action
against Diet Dr. Pepper went flat when a California federal judge held that the
term «Diet» alone on a soft drink label does not constitute a claim that the soft drink will assist in weight loss.
We are therefore of the opinion that the court below no more erred in sustaining this indictment than it did at a former
term, at the instance of this same
plaintiff in error, in adjudging another bad which was found
against him for the same offence by a grand jury composed of twenty - three persons.
The
term has its historical roots in the common law tradition where the tort of alienation of affection was a cause of action
against a third party adult who «steals» the affection of the
plaintiff's spouse.
In the litigation of fault divorce, the
term used in the counterclaim to accuse the
plaintiff (complainant) of adultery, if initially stated as a ground for divorce
against the defendant (respondent).
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third party beneficiary of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the parties and did not expressly set forth that one party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant
against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including
plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded
plaintiff; triable issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the parties over the lease
terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease
terms were finalized