The government's # 3 billion real -
terms cut to education funding must be reversed or we will see education and care suffer.
«This new report from the Education Policy Institute confirms what the National Education Union has been saying about the impact of the Government's real
terms cuts to education funding.
Not exact matches
In
terms of the state's economic woes, Cuomo said there will have
to be
cuts to education, health care and state operations.
• In practical and policy
terms, what this means is that the APC administration
to be sworn in on October 15, 2018, by the grace of God, must resume good governance that was
cut short four years ago, and once again prioritise social investments in
education, healthcare and other social protection programmes that reduce the cost of living, while raising the quality of life.
In next week's emergency budget legislation,
to keep state government operating in the absence of a new budget, Mr. Paterson will include an array of further long -
term spending
cuts, but none involving
education funds, according
to an administration official.
Iannuzzi will begin his latest
term at a critical juncture for the labor movement, as issues like collective bargaining and seniority are under attack nationwide, and as public K - 12 and higher
education in New York struggle
to cope with the devastating effects of more than $ 1 billion in
cuts by state government.
Most noteworthy is the party's declaration that it will resist any further
cuts to front - line services and wants a real -
term increase in health and
education spending.
Here's the full text of Cuomo's e-mail, which was forwarded by a reader (interestingly, it speaks in very general
terms about the budget and «realigning» spending, but makes no mention of the deep
education and health care
cuts, which opponents say will lead
to service reductions):
«I don't believe we have
to do any
cutting in
terms of
education and health care, and I think we'll see growth, significant growth, in both,» said Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie.
Turning rhetoric into reality will be a tough call — public spending
cuts show no sign of letting up and the combination of rising demand for school places, lack of accountability and
cuts to education budgets in real
terms will need careful consideration if we are
to improve standards and equity in
education within the next administration.
What are the short and long
term implications for essential services, local taxpayers and the state's economy of the freezes and
cuts in revenue sharing with cities, towns and villages and in state aid
to education have helped the state
to balance its own budgets in recent years?
Instead of levying further
cuts, they add, it's time
to make the sort of investments — in research,
education, and infrastructure — that will produce long -
term economic growth.
While the drop appears
to have resulted from budget
cuts prompted by the economic downturn, Davis said evidence suggests that the curtailment of prison
education could increase prison system costs in the longer
term.
As the Institute for Fiscal Studies pointed out recently, the government's funding commitment equates
to the first real
terms cut in
education spending since the 1990s.
TES has reported that Tony Foot, director of the Department for
Education's funding group, is under «no illusion» about the financial challenges schools are due
to face as a result of rising costs and real
terms budget
cuts.
Terrel H. Bell, secretary of
education during President Reagan's first
term, has criticized the Administration's proposed
cuts in aid
to college students, saying they constitute an «unwitting assault on the nation's colleges and universities.»
While the
education secretary, Justine Greening, promised an extra # 1.3 bn for state schools over two years, headteachers across England calculated that this amount would translate
to a real ‑
terms cut of 4.6 per cent from 2015.
The
Education Policy Institute estimates that by 2019 - 2020 there are unlikely
to be any schools in England which will avoid a real
terms cut in per pupil funding, even in areas benefiting from the new formula.
The union believe that a top priority for the
education sector should be
to fund
education fully and fairly, by reversing the # 3 billion real
terms cuts that schools are facing and providing enough money
to make the new national funding formula a success.
The research comes after the Institute for Fiscal Studies found that schools in England are facing their first real -
terms funding
cuts in 20 years, reductions that the Public Accounts Committee warn are threatening
to undermine the quality of
education in English schools.
According
to the union, the Conservative
education plans would result in a # 8.9 billion real
terms cut in
education by 2022 when taking into account inflation and growing pupil numbers.
Decades of best practice,
cutting edge research in early
education including the Head Start Impact Study, expert advice, and The Secretary's Advisory Committee's recommendations all culminate in a call
to action for policy changes that ensure all Head Start programs provide a consistently high quality early learning experience that prepares children for Kindergarten and has long -
term effects on their academic success and overall health.
Real
terms cuts to school funding since 2015 have led to a big reduction in the number of secondary teachers, teaching assistants and support staff in England, says research published today by the School Cuts alliance of education uni
cuts to school funding since 2015 have led
to a big reduction in the number of secondary teachers, teaching assistants and support staff in England, says research published today by the School
Cuts alliance of education uni
Cuts alliance of
education unions.
That means focusing on the lower - hanging fruit in
terms of
cutting costs - such as
cutting interest rates, which are currently up
to 6.1 %, and have been attacked as bafflingly high by a long line of former Conservative and Labour
education ministers.
Despite the promise
to move # 1.3 bn from the Department for
Education's budget directly into school spending, the heads say they will still have faced a real -
terms cut of # 1.7 bn between 2015 and 2020.
The head of a the NEA, Reginald Weaver, recently spoke out in very strident
terms against NCLB and President Bush's
cuts to education funding
to pay for the Iraq war.
The Lib Dems also want
to end
cuts to education by protecting per - pupil spending «in real
terms, including in further
education».
However shocking the threat of a more than $ 2 billion
cut to Title II is
to most
education leaders, it is important
to remember that the President proposed
cutting in half Title II spending in the short -
term spending measure, but when all was said and done in the Congress, a far more modest 8.9 percent reduction was the eventual outcome.
But he warned that the
education secretary needed
to address «as a matter of priority» more immediate questions, such as the «severe teacher shortages and significant real -
terms cuts in funding».
To «balance the budget», more than A$ 600 million was
cut from public school
education and $ 1.2 billion from TAFE over the
term of this government.
Labour has pledged
to invest more than # 20bn in schools in England by 2022, as part of a package of
education pledges, saying it would protect real
terms schools funding and
cut class sizes for five, six and seven - year olds.
The spokesperson claimed that Tory plans
to freeze spending for five
to 16 - year - olds at its current level, leading
to a
cut in real
terms and the threat of further slices from unprotected
education budgets, would mean overall spending of # 5bn less than the Lib Dems by 2020.
Liberal Democrat
education spokesman John Pugh urged the government
to protect the school budget in real
terms, adding that he was concerned that the announcement did not rule more out
cuts to school budgets «which are already overstretched».
«It is also misleading for the DfE
to continue
to state that more is being spent on
education when in fact, real
terms cuts are occurring,» say the head teachers.
The letter calls for per - pupil funding
to be protected in real
terms, as well as a reversal of the # 600m
cut to the
education services grant, and a commitment
to «sufficient funding» for sixth forms.
The report stated this will be the «first time schools have seen real -
terms cuts in spending per pupil since the mid 1990s», adding it presents a «challenge
to continuing
to provide high - quality
education at every stage».
In a time and situation like this,
education leaders must step forward and appeal
to legislators in both parties
to craft a sensible, long -
term fiscal plan for the nation that avoids short -
term and haphazard budget
cuts that imperil investments in
education.
The CEA's endorsement means that the leadership of all of the major public employee unions in Connecticut have thrown their support behind the candidate who has pledged that he will not propose or accept any tax increase during this second
term, despite the fact that Connecticut is facing a $ 4.8 billion budget shortfall over the next three years.While Connecticut's millionaires continue
to celebrate the fact that they have been spared the need
to «sacrifice» by being required
to pay their fair share in taxes, Malloy's policies will ensure massive increases in local property taxes for the middle class and widespread
cuts in local
education budgets.
The Chancellor has failed
to reverse the real
terms education cuts; failed
to provide new money
to fully fund all areas of
education; failed
to level - up funding
to address historic underfunding; and failed
to guarantee the investment needed for future years.
«The Government had a big political choice
to make in today's Budget —
to invest in
education, or
to continue with its damaging policy of real
terms cuts.