Not exact matches
However, the main criteria was
to incorporate artificial intelligence in the products and demonstrate the benefits
of the product towards the legal profession in the future in
terms of speed, efficiency, and increased
access to justice for everyone.
Following the legal aid cuts introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Act 2012 («LASPO»), it is clear that
access to justice has been severely limited — both in
terms of the areas
of law
for which people can obtain publicly - funded legal advice and representation, and in relation
to the proportion
of people who are financially eligible
for such legal help.
Generally lauded by judges and leaders
of the profession, the long -
term systemic value
of pro bono legal service is a matter
of limited but uneasy debate in the community
of reformers, progressives and do - gooders dedicated
to the concept
of equal
access to justice for everyone.
We do have
to realize that
Access to Justice is a blanket
term for what are really a series
of vertical markets that are silo - ed by legal subject area, jurisdiction, and political will (
to name a few).
I am a bit biased here since I am a mediator, but «
access to justice», in
terms of having a matter adjudicated in Ontario, does not exist
for the average litigant.
It also proposes long
term solutions
for new lawyers, new models
of CLE, and that a commission be established
to explore new service delivery options and regulatory reform that would encourage competition, innovation, and increased
access to justice while also protecting the public.
The
terms of reference
for the inquiry included a consideration
of how the introduction
of ET fees had affected
access to justice.
In 1998, after five years in private practice, I took a job in public legal education and was soon thereafter introduced
to the problems many people have in
accessing justice, whether in
terms of working effectively with their lawyers, finding a lawyer, paying
for a lawyer, or trying
to address legal issues without the assistance
of a lawyer.
If an online procedure does not reduce the costs
for small claims litigants then it loses its major source
of attraction in
terms of access to justice.
For example, one of our keynote speakers is, I am going to totally mispronounce her name, and I apologize to her in advance, but, Haben Girma, and she is the first blind deaf attorney to graduate from Harvard Law School, and she is going to come and talk about the idea of accessibility, both for clients and how there are accessibility challenges in terms of accessing justice, but also for lawyers, and how the different challenges that each lawyer face are surmountable, and she will use her personal example to walk you through th
For example, one
of our keynote speakers is, I am going
to totally mispronounce her name, and I apologize
to her in advance, but, Haben Girma, and she is the first blind deaf attorney
to graduate from Harvard Law School, and she is going
to come and talk about the idea
of accessibility, both
for clients and how there are accessibility challenges in terms of accessing justice, but also for lawyers, and how the different challenges that each lawyer face are surmountable, and she will use her personal example to walk you through th
for clients and how there are accessibility challenges in
terms of accessing justice, but also
for lawyers, and how the different challenges that each lawyer face are surmountable, and she will use her personal example to walk you through th
for lawyers, and how the different challenges that each lawyer face are surmountable, and she will use her personal example
to walk you through that.
Evidence
of this could be found,
for example, in the large amount
of materials posted on the Commission's website (videotaped presentations, webinar, written submissions,...) and the Commission's efforts
to facilitate a large number
of what it
termed «grassroots meetings,» which the Commission described as «local conversations [
to] create new avenues
for access to justice for all and open doors
to new career opportunities
for current and future lawyers.»
Building the capability
of the next generation
of citizens
to anticipate and manage legal problems is a long -
term strategy
for increasing
access to justice.
In a recent article, «Evidence - Based
Access to Justice ``, Laura Abel of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law highlights the lack of evidence - based approaches in evaluating access to justice initiatives in the civil justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win — a
Access to Justice ``, Laura Abel of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law highlights the lack of evidence - based approaches in evaluating access to justice initiatives in the civil justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win —
Justice ``, Laura Abel
of the Brennan Center
for Justice at NYU School of Law highlights the lack of evidence - based approaches in evaluating access to justice initiatives in the civil justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win —
Justice at NYU School
of Law highlights the lack
of evidence - based approaches in evaluating
access to justice initiatives in the civil justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win — a
access to justice initiatives in the civil justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win —
justice initiatives in the civil
justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability of a self - represented litigant to manage — and win —
justice system, and proposes that legal help lines and information centres could be measured in
terms of a demonstrable impact on the ability
of a self - represented litigant
to manage — and win — a case.
There are a number
of factors which make managing A1C particularly difficult
for teens including: Social pressures and responsibilities, motivation, personality, nutrition, substance use, sleep habits, brain re-structuring, defence mechanisms (such as denial and avoidance), social
justice issues (oppresion — racism), diabetes education, individuation, future - oriented culture,
access to health services, family structure and dynamic issues, marital conflict between parents, family and friendship conflict with teen, mental health stigma, academic pressure and responsibility, limited mindfulness and somatic awareness, spirituality (especially concerning death), an under - developed ability
to conceptualize long -
term cause and effect (this is developmentally normal
for teens), co-parenting discrepencies, emotional inteligence, individuation, hormonal changes, the tendency
for co-morbidity (people with diabetes can be more prone
to additional physical and mental health diagnosis), and many other life / environmental stressors (poverty, grief etc.).