Sentences with phrase «terms of right and wrong»

Dogs do not feel guilty in the human sense of the word since dogs do not think in terms of right and wrong, but in terms of what works and what does not work for them.

It would be taken up in the order of grace and would be governed by the wisdom of the soul, not by the material environment, in terms of right and wrong, good and bad.

Not exact matches

I know that once I hear or read one of those terms, it almost always means that the person using the term is going to tell us that their magic term means they are right and the other person is wrong because the other person is using a «straw man», they're «cherry picking» or now they're on «the slippery slope».

But there are two points I'd like to make here: firstly, we should never, ever reject our children for what we term «disobedience» — Discipline, yes, but rejection, no; secondly, what we deem to be right and wrong, particularly when dictated to by an outside agency like a church, or even our own interpretation of scripture, may not be what is right for them.

Well and Saul may have not even understood his own mind in terms of right or wrong.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

You have no clue on what is actually right and wrong in terms of marriage.

Wrong does not become right, yet God is near to Job once again, and in this nearness Job finds meaning in what has happened to him, a meaning which can not be stated in any other terms than those of the relationship itself.

The «highest» value - modality is the holy (characterized positively by the holy, negatively by the unholy); the next «highest» is the spiritual (characterized positively by the beautiful, the right, and the pure cognition of truth and negatively by the ugly, the wrong, and the positivistic quest of truth in terms of controlling nature); the third «highest» of the value - modalities is the vital (characterized positively by the noble and negatively by the vulgar); the next «highest» region is the useful (characterized positively by the useful and negatively by the nonuseful); and the «lowest» region is the.

Kass's ambitious use of the term — as a clear standard for determining what is right and wrong and in keeping with our nature, and for judging the course of biomedicine — strikes me as impossible for such a soft and abstract concept.

The citations for the idea of «Binding» and «Loosing» being Jurisdicational and legalistic terms for determining right and wrong are here: The Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Tyndale House publishers), Old Testament Light (Harper and Rowe), and Word Studies in the New Testament (Marvin R. Vincent), George Lamsa (aramaic scholar protestant writer), to name a few, there are many more.

In personal life, choices of right and wrong come down to balancing the competing moral claims of self and family, personal security and professional interests, short - term and long - run good.

Sadly you also throw around the term «child abuse» with a cavalier looseness that suggests you don't have the foggiest idea what child abuse is... it's a shame abused children everywhere can't write in and tell you about their trevails at the hands of an abuser... Jesus Christ was no abuser... if I'm wrong about Jesus, he was at least a Rabbi who loved his followers, and who taught, peace, compassion, forgiveness, and inclusiveness... If I'm right, Jesus is the most amazing, wonderful gift GOD could ever give to his beloved creation... in either event, belief in him, and sharing those beliefs with children is not abuse, it's loving and nurturing fact based belief, not mythology...

As we all know and as been said by many Arsenal fans and critics, Wenger needs to come to terms with the current football price / pay structure and adapt... Accepting that he is wrong and tight and change... I hope for the sake of Arsenal fans all over the world, that Mr Wenger does the right thing and buys a WC striker, ARW midfielder, and CB defender.

Family members keep each other's needs in mind and try not to define things in terms of «right» and «wrong.»

Victor A. Kovner, Chair of the Fund for Modern Courts, said: «The signing of the Quadrennial Commission legislation rights a wrong that has existed for more than a decade which has left the judiciary, upon whom we depend to protect our fundamental rights and liberties, unprotected in terms of their basic compensation.»

The absurdity of suggesting that Iain Duncan Smith's Christian motivations were any kind of secret and of criticising the use of moral categories to justify his policy approaches - only lefties are allowed to have morals, after all; to be Right Wing is, by definition, to be evil, seeking to impose final solutions on the poor, force them to eat rotting horse - flesh, and cleansing them from beyond the sight of nice middle class folk; any right - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by CraRight Wing is, by definition, to be evil, seeking to impose final solutions on the poor, force them to eat rotting horse - flesh, and cleansing them from beyond the sight of nice middle class folk; any right - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by Craright - winger employing a moral term such as «wrong» or «sin» must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by Cranmer.

«The leader of HHS will be at the tip of the spear, working to not only right the wrongs of this deeply flawed [Affordable Care Act] law, but also ensure the long - term sustainability of both Medicare and Medicaid,» Hatch said in a press release.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

Ethics refers to standards of right and wrong or what we «ought» to do in terms of virtues like obligations and human rights, but ethics also include virtues of compassion and community.

I prefer the more robust concept embodied in the sin of omission, which I would translate into these plain, secular, and very simple terms: If you have the power to help someone, if you have the ability to right a wrong, or if you have the opportunity to make your voices heard, you should rightfully feel bad when you fail to do so.

The argument here is that both are partially right but also partially wrong: Rhee and Klein are right to have faith in some of the new providers (many of whom are embracing the international lessons in terms of selecting talent and carefully preparing them for practice), and they are also right that the culture of bureaucratic districts tends to produce a compliance mentality that we need to escape.

With Ice Cream Sandwich righting the wrongs of Honeycomb three days ago in terms of source code availability, possibilities for mods and custom versions are blossoming again.

I think what this translates into is, we are going to leave your current terms in place for now instead of jacking up your payment, but we don't concede we were wrong and we reserve the right to raise the minimum at some future date.

Before you sign up, make sure you carefully check the type of contract you are agreeing to, its terms and conditions, your repayment obligations and your protections and rights if things go wrong.

Negotiating an affordable rate with the lender, deciding the right payment schedule and term of mortgage and even getting help and assistance from the lender are some of the main factors that confuse first time buyers and push them towards making the wrong decisions.

The difference between buying a stock at the right time versus the wrong time can add up to thousands and even millions of dollars over the long term.

The Travel Provider Terms will set out what rights you have against the Travel Provider and will explain their liability to you in the event of anything going wrong.

I could talk about the painful voice acting, the singularly cringe - worthy cut - scenes, the innumerable graphics glitches, or the moments in the game where you die for no apparent reason (especially in the snowboarding level, which is a particularly low point in gameplay terms as it even manages to feature checkpoints that you can miss by a whisker and then continue playing, only to be plonked right back at the start of the level when you inevitably die by running into a pile of rocks that you couldn't see because the camera was pointed the wrong way).

What really has me hooked is creating a world where it's not about good and bad, right and wrong, it's about the short term and long term consequences of your decisions in game.

Further, whether it is «right» or «wrong» to «do the ethical thing» (and I would submit that in reality, that's a very weak argument in terms of its potential to effect change), my point was that if Obama really wants to «do the right thing», he needs the rest of the world to do the same.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

«Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.»

To believe that Mann is right, you have to believe that the developer of the first satellite global temperature record, and the winner of the International Meetings on Statistical Climatology achievement award, and the co-editor of The Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, and the co-editor of Forecast Verification: A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, and the co-founder of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, and a member of the UN Secretary - General's High Level Group on Sustainable Energy, and the Professor of Meteorology at the Meteorological Institute of Berlin Free University, and the Professor of Climate and Culture at King's College, London, and the Professor of the Economics of Climate Change at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and the former president of the Royal Statistical Society, and the former director of research at the Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute, and the director of the Center for Climatic Research at the University of Delaware, and three professors at the Department of Geology and Geophysics at the University of Utah, and the scientist at Columbia's Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory who coined the term «global warming», and dozens more are all wrong, every single one of them.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic socialism and environmental policy.

It starts to explain the right and the wrong in material terms of «true and false».

original research papers, four books in several editions, many book chapters, around a thousand articles in major newspapers and magazines, and... But none of that means anything, in terms of whether my calculations of the insolation changes are right or wrong.

That doesn't make me right and them wrong, but there is no reason at all to think that their fit is meaningful, with a complete lack of explanation for any of the sinusoidal terms.

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.

luke, I forget your purpose here is to make mischief; you want me to say that Neutrino is right and Nasif is wrong; Neutrino has laid out how he thinks SB should be applied, in terms of emission not absorption, Nasif wants his formula for absorptivity explained by Neutrino; I don't understand the formula and have said so; do you understand it?

It depends, and there's kind of no right or wrong in terms of... You're going.

Data protection has become a board - level issue — the risks of getting it wrong threaten the viability of the organisation, while getting it right can bring massive benefits in terms of efficiency and competitiveness on the global stage.

Tort Claim In general terms, a tort is a civil wrong, involving a breach of duty or a negligent act by one person which results in injury or loss to another, and gives the injured party the right to bring a legal action for damages.

¹ The term «professionalism» reflects the codes of conduct that serve as guidance for what a lawyer should understand to be right and wrong — rules that shape what it means to be a professional and what the public can in turn measure our conduct by.

For the sake of argument, we'll define ethics as the well - founded standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues; the study and development of one's standards and beliefs to ensure they're reasonable and well - founded; and striving to ensure that we, and the institutions we help to shape, live up to standards that are reasonable and solidly - based.

I still think this was the right strategic analysis — Apple's services differentiate its hardware, as opposed to its hardware existing to push Apple's services — but it was the wrong financial analysis: Apple's services may be exclusive to Apple devices, 2 but Apple's install base is so large — 1.3 billion devices, according to Thursday's 1Q 2018 earnings call — that Services revenue will inevitably rise with a user base that is both growing in terms of numbers and usage, and that is meaningful indeed ($ 8.5 billion last quarter alone).

The fourth step in writing the best accountant resume is to meet once again with you, the client, in order to determine what we have done right and what we have done wrong in terms of your public accountant resume.

There is truly no right or wrong here, and therefore it's up to you to decide what will be best for you in terms of the importance of family planning or the family planning methods that you utilize.

Well there's this girl we've known each other about 8 years as about 3 years ago I was in a long term relationship with her sister for about 4 years and we broke up and every relation ship if ever been in my exs sisters always been the reason for my break ups well sort of and well that's when I started getting proper feelings for her i now its wrong as im now 25 ands she just turned 18 but were both crazy like the same thing iv just never been so infactuated about someone like her and she did wan na be with me but turned her down for another girl and well if got such regrets as I do love her and I'm now single and we did try and said that were seeing each other but it worked out to hard as we had sex and it didn't feel right for her like kissing was fine but things like snogging didn't feel right as I'm her sisters ex but her sister accepted and always new I had feelings for sister and well I really waana be with this girl and she's all I now but she just finds the intermussy bit to hard and well she just wants to call us friends but she feels how I feel and well I just don't now what to do as she was the best friend I could always talk to about my problems and now I feel alone cuz she just finds away to shy around it and says things like let's see what the future bring and I'm scared that I blew my chance of being with the one girl that's been there for me my best friend and that tho she Says she want to be with me iI feel like it won't happen and I'm scared that I can't take much more I tell her that I'm not going anywhere but don't now how long I can hold on for