I mean, the conditions are much more suitable now, not just in
terms of the scientific knowledge we have these days you can apply to it, but also the environmental conditions.
Bob, I certainly couldn't hold a candle to you in
terms of scientific knowledge or background, but I find your premises and logic baffling, as you knew, a priori exactly what point you wanted to make, and knew you could make it by throwing out the places on the planet where the first and most severe impacts of AGW have been projected to be seen, and are being seen, and then you mischaracterize the nature of polar amplification to try and further justify your point.
Not exact matches
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid
of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized
terms; the affirmation that the Bible is
of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel
of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any
scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
Moltmann's thoughts on the dangers
of using the power
of scientific knowledge without pondering beauty - and in particular on the dangers
of the «economisation»
of science in this century, in which
scientific thought may only be valued generally in
terms of its economic power - would be shared by many researchers in the UK.
For, in the words
of Jacques Monod in Chance and Necessity, «The cornerstone
of scientific method is... the systematic denial that «true»
knowledge can be got at by interpreting phenomena in
terms of... «purpose.
Palmer always uses the
term «objective» to describe the antagonistic posture
of the isolated, active knower who seeks, for purposes
of manipulation and control, to grasp, through the
scientific method, the passive objects
of the world in such a way that the
knowledge that results «will reflect the nature
of the objects in question rather than the knower's whims.»
The one unifying factor is that the people have been educated in an atmosphere that is not only secular but that reflects the easy assumptions
of a
scientific secularism, where all the answers may be found in
terms of human
knowledge.
The prevailing narrative
of the rise
of West, which focuses on the importance
of the revival
of Ancient Greek
knowledge following the Dark Ages in paving the way for the Renaissance, the
Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, has a tendency to portray Europe's rise in self - contained euro - centric
terms, often failing to acknowledge debts from further afield.
«So, first, you should research what they may be seeking for [in
terms of which
scientific skills and
knowledge].
LeVine says that the main problem is a lack
of scientific knowledge about the baseline conditions in the region, in
terms of everything from ocean currents to animal populations.
National Centres have a broad base in
terms of experience, but want to bring in new recruits with detailed
knowledge in emerging
scientific fields to develop their «intelligence gathering» strategic role.
This study — only the second overall assessment
of diet and food on this disease — provides a very thorough evaluation
of current
scientific knowledge and makes a point
of only reporting dietary interventions and specific foods that clearly show proven long -
term effects.
On the other hand, if
scientific research is neglected to focus on near -
term, quick payoff pursuits, then very quickly the supply
of knowledge will be exhausted.»
The
scientific name he gave to the sweet, yellow banana was Musa sapentium, from a Latin
term meaning «wise» (as in the tree
of knowledge).
We conduct
scientific inquiry to increase
knowledge of marine mammals, their health and their environment, and to help assure their long -
term survival.
His vision as a sculptor is based on observation and experience both in
terms of ideas; drawn upon his early
scientific background and his extensive
knowledge of the history
of cultural evolution, together with his visual and tactile ability to respond to the forms in his sculptures while in the process
of making them.
Regarding whether those ignorant in statistics can understand Hansen's latest papers, I'm a perfect test case: My
knowledge of stats is low (if I had ever heard the
term «sigma» before, I don't recall it), and only have a basic humanities major's ability to grasp
scientific arguments (well, maybe a little better since I work with scientists as expert witnesses).
* The role
of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their
term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement
of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that
scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction
of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use
of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)
The key lesson to be learnt is that not only must
scientific knowledge about climate change be publicly owned - the IPCC does a fair job
of this according to its own
terms - but that in the new century
of digital communication and an active citizenry, the very practices
of scientific enquiry must also be publicly owned.
To our
knowledge, the study remains the only peer - reviewed paper published in a
scientific journal that provides
scientific forecasts
of long -
term global mean temperatures.
The
term «
scientific» is to be understood in a broad sense as the most reliable way
of gaining
knowledge about anything, whether it be the human spirit, the role
of great people in history, or the structure
of DNA.
That the evidence must be reliable is implied by the use in Rule 702
of the
term «
scientific knowledge.»