I'm not a biologist, but everything I think of as
terrestrial life produces a waste product.
Not exact matches
Hartshorne suggests, however, that resurrection can be interpreted as a «synthesis of one's
life in God, the divine act of envisagement that keeps adding up the story of one's
terrestrial existence,
producing a total reality that is invisible to us on earth» (LP 261 - 62).
These bacteria are believed to have
produced the oxygen that paved the way for
terrestrial life to evolve.
Life prefers to use the lighter Carbon - 12, which reacts a bit more readily, so amino acid molecules from terrestrial life will have less Carbon - 13 compared to amino acids produced by non-biological reactions in astero
Life prefers to use the lighter Carbon - 12, which reacts a bit more readily, so amino acid molecules from
terrestrial life will have less Carbon - 13 compared to amino acids produced by non-biological reactions in astero
life will have less Carbon - 13 compared to amino acids
produced by non-biological reactions in asteroids.
Terrestrial life uses the left - handed versions, while non-biological chemistry
produces the left - handed and right - handed varieties in equal amounts.
One well - known model for the beginnings of
life on Earth posits that
terrestrial life sprang from complex molecules such as amino acids and sugars
produced by electrical discharges in a primeval atmosphere replete with gases such as methane, hydrogen, ammonia and water.
Researchers found that although
terrestrial living things absorb more CO2 every year than what they are
producing, they are still a net source of nitrous oxide and methane.
The oceans would then become a realm of bacteria metabolizing sulfates, and
producing hydrogen sulfide, which would then get released into the water and the atmosphere, killing oceanic plants and
terrestrial life.