Sentences with phrase «territory of residence as»

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, many provinces and territories have said they are restricting the consumption of cannabis to privately owned residences but some jurisdictions such as Ontario are soliciting feedback on whether to allow for licensed cannabis consumption lounges.

Moreover, residence on Scottish territory, even without being born in Scotland or of Scottish ancestry, can be a qualification for citizenship as well.

If you're in a high tax bracket, her withdrawal could be taxed as high as 54 % on your tax return depending on your province or territory of residence.

It is recalled that, under the ECHR, there is no obligation to respect the choice of a married couple as to their matrimonial residence and to authorize family reunion in this territory (see Gül v Switzerland).

In my paper (and in my October post on the European Law Blog: http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=3437), I argue that this could be achieved through amending the Immigration Act to give rights of residence etc to all EU citizens who are present on UK territory as a result of previously enforceable EU law.

By virtue of S. 1 Wills Act 1967, «a will shall be treated as properly executed if its execution conformed to the internal law in force in the territory where it was executed, or in the territory where, at the time of its execution or of the testator's death, he was domiciled or had his habitual residence, or in a state of which, at either of those times, he was a national.»

as concerns the recognition and enforcement of a judgment given in a court of a Member State on the territory of another Member State, even if the child concerned has his or her habitual residence on the territory of a third State which is a contracting Party to the said Convention.

As the Advocate General observes in point 44 of his Opinion, it is the relationship of dependency between the Union citizen who is a minor and the third country national who is refused a right of residence that is liable to jeopardise the effectiveness of Union citizenship, since it is that dependency that would lead to the Union citizen being obliged, in fact, to leave not only the territory of the Member State of which he is a national but also that of the European Union as a whole, as a consequence of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and Others, paragraphs 65 to 67As the Advocate General observes in point 44 of his Opinion, it is the relationship of dependency between the Union citizen who is a minor and the third country national who is refused a right of residence that is liable to jeopardise the effectiveness of Union citizenship, since it is that dependency that would lead to the Union citizen being obliged, in fact, to leave not only the territory of the Member State of which he is a national but also that of the European Union as a whole, as a consequence of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and Others, paragraphs 65 to 67as a whole, as a consequence of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and Others, paragraphs 65 to 67as a consequence of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and Others, paragraphs 65 to 67).

53 By contrast, although the aim of Directive 2004/38 is to facilitate and strengthen the exercise of the primary and individual right — conferred directly on all Union citizens by the Treaty — to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (see Case C ‑ 127 / 08 Metock and Others [2008] ECR I ‑ 6241, paragraphs 82 and 59; Case C ‑ 162 / 09 Lassal [2010] ECR I ‑ 9217, paragraph 30; and Case C ‑ 434 / 09 McCarthy [2011] ECR I ‑ 3375, paragraph 28), it is also intended, as is apparent from Article 1 (a) thereof, to set out the conditions governing the exercise of that right (see, to that effect, McCarthy, paragraph 33, and Joined Cases C ‑ 424 / 10 and C ‑ 425 / 10 Ziolkowski and Szeja [2011] ECR I ‑ 14035, paragraphs 36 and 40), which include, where residence is desired for a period of longer than three months, the condition laid down in Article 7 (1)(b) of the directive that Union citizens who do not or no longer have worker status must have sufficient resources.

80 In the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.

This plan offers coverage for those who will be traveling outside of their province or territory of residence who would like trip protection coverage as well as emergency hospital and medical coverage.