Sentences with phrase «territory of residence on»

ELIGIBILITY: In order to win a prize you must be a legal resident of Canada who are at least 18 years or older in their province / territory of residence on the date of entry, have filled out the linky entry form and participated in the Twitter Party following the hashtag #back2school.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, many provinces and territories have said they are restricting the consumption of cannabis to privately owned residences but some jurisdictions such as Ontario are soliciting feedback on whether to allow for licensed cannabis consumption lounges.

Moreover, residence on Scottish territory, even without being born in Scotland or of Scottish ancestry, can be a qualification for citizenship as well.

The options available depend on your province or territory of residence and whether you have a provincial or national student loan.

If you're in a high tax bracket, her withdrawal could be taxed as high as 54 % on your tax return depending on your province or territory of residence.

For perspective, the tax rate for a Canadian dividend for someone earning $ 50,000 of income ranges from 8 % to 19 % depending on your province or territory of residence.

(1) For the purpose of this Treaty the territory of a Contracting Party shall include all territory under the jurisdiction of that Contracting Party, including air space and territorial waters and vessels and aircraft registered in that Contracting Party or aircraft leased without crew to a lessee who has his principal place of business, or, if the lessee has no such place of business, his permanent residence in, that Contracting Party if any such aircraft is in flight, or if any such vessel is on the high seas when the offense is committed.

In my paper (and in my October post on the European Law Blog: http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=3437), I argue that this could be achieved through amending the Immigration Act to give rights of residence etc to all EU citizens who are present on UK territory as a result of previously enforceable EU law.

Legislation of a Member State restricting eligibility for a jobseeker's allowance to persons who have a right of residence on the territory of that Member State

Where the child has his or her habitual residence in the territory of a third State which is not a contracting party to the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children, jurisdiction under this Article shall be deemed to be in the child's interest, in particular if it is found impossible to hold proceedings in the third State in question.

as concerns the recognition and enforcement of a judgment given in a court of a Member State on the territory of another Member State, even if the child concerned has his or her habitual residence on the territory of a third State which is a contracting Party to the said Convention.

30 In those circumstances, it appears that the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings is dependent on knowing whether a Member State may refuse to grant the compensatory supplement to nationals of other Member States on the grounds that — like Mr Brey — they do not, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of that Member State for a period of longer than three months, since, in order to obtain that right, the person concerned must have sufficient resources not to apply for, inter alia, the compensatory supplement.

46 With respect, finally, to the right of residence of a person who is a third country national in the Member State of residence of his minor children, nationals of that Member State, who are dependant on him and of whom he and his spouse have joint custody, the Court has held that the refusal to grant a right of residence would have the consequence that those children, who are citizens of the Union, would have to leave the territory of the Union in order to accompany their parents, and that those citizens of the Union would, in fact, be unable to exercise the substance of the rights conferred by their status (Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 44).

53 By contrast, although the aim of Directive 2004/38 is to facilitate and strengthen the exercise of the primary and individual right — conferred directly on all Union citizens by the Treaty — to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (see Case C ‑ 127 / 08 Metock and Others [2008] ECR I ‑ 6241, paragraphs 82 and 59; Case C ‑ 162 / 09 Lassal [2010] ECR I ‑ 9217, paragraph 30; and Case C ‑ 434 / 09 McCarthy [2011] ECR I ‑ 3375, paragraph 28), it is also intended, as is apparent from Article 1 (a) thereof, to set out the conditions governing the exercise of that right (see, to that effect, McCarthy, paragraph 33, and Joined Cases C ‑ 424 / 10 and C ‑ 425 / 10 Ziolkowski and Szeja [2011] ECR I ‑ 14035, paragraphs 36 and 40), which include, where residence is desired for a period of longer than three months, the condition laid down in Article 7 (1)(b) of the directive that Union citizens who do not or no longer have worker status must have sufficient resources.

80 In the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.

(Freedom of movement for persons — Union Citizenship — Directive 2004 / 38 / EC — Right of residence for more than three months — Article 7 (1)(b)-- Person no longer having worker status — Person in possession of a retirement pension — Having sufficient resources not to become a burden on the «social assistance system» of the host Member State — Application for a special non-contributory cash benefit — Compensatory supplement intended to augment a retirement pension — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 3 (2) and 70 — Competence of the Member State of residence — Conditions for granting — Legal right to reside on the national territory — Compliance with European Union law)

(Citizenship of the Union — Article 20 TFEU − Directive 2003 / 86 / EC − Right to family reunification − Union citizens who are minor children living with their mothers, who are third country nationals, in the territory of the Member State of which the children are nationals — Permanent right of residence in that Member State of the mothers who have been granted sole custody of the Union citizens — Change in composition of the families following the mothers» remarriage to third country nationals and the birth of children of those marriages who are also third country nationals — Applications for family reunification in the Member State of origin of the Union citizens — Refusal of the right of residence to the new spouses on the ground of lack of sufficient resources — Right to respect for family life — Taking into consideration of the children's best interests)

47 By way of such limitations and conditions, Article 7 (1)(b) of Directive 2004/38 provides that a Member State may require nationals of another Member State wishing to have the right of residence on its territory for a period of longer than three months without being economically active to have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State and sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the social assistance system of that Member State during their period of residence (see, to that effect, Case C ‑ 480 / 08 Teixeira [2010] ECR I ‑ 1107, paragraph 42).

The tables set out basic child support amounts that depend on the income, the number of children, and the province or territory of residence.