Why not freeze their assets as a suspected
terrorist organizations under Canadian law?
The embassy's spokesman, Russel Brooks, had recently said the US does not view IPOB as
a terrorist organization under US laws.
Not exact matches
A U.S. official would have to establish in a Declaration
under penalty of perjury that an individual was associated with one of the
terrorist organizations covered by the AUMF to declare someone an enemy combatant.
The fictitious case was about whether an 18 - year - old's YouTube video promoting a
terrorist organization is protected
under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In addition to going after Muslim charities and
organizations (defaming NCCM for instance), and even religious symbols, his jihad against «radical Islam» and search for
terrorists under every Muslim bed has profoundly altered the Canadian legal landscape.
The result, in my view, was a flawed and overreaching interpretation of the standards
under Canadian law for labelling someone as engaging in terrorism or being a member of a
terrorist organization.
Federal law does make it a crime and authorize indefinite detention or death
under military discretion, for being a member of certain
terrorist organizations identified in the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) since the United States has declared war on those
organizations.