Sentences with phrase «terrorists do»

The good news is that such air capture could be less expensive and invasive than, for instance, such measures, mentioned above, as «seeding the oceans with iron to spur plankton blooms» (which strikes me as a global ecological disaster waiting to happen if a mutation occurs or terrorists do a genetic hack.)
These terrorists do not demand for ransom, their intention is to blow up train station and escape in desert city.
Terrorists don't — and can't afford to — think much about their victims.
Importantly, however, the terrorists do resemble the heroes found in the «cinema of moral concern».
M.I.C. Joseph Zimmer (Jake Abel), who also works on the team, argues with her worldview — noting that terrorists don't think about civilian deaths when they are targeting our citizens.
In this historical fantasy, produced by Tim Burton, vampires strike the same twitchy nerve among the citizenry that terrorists do in our real world.
Terrorists don't have any power over us — in fact they have less power to threaten us than street criminals.
Todays terrorists do nt care if they escape.»
We need databases on how governments respond to terrorism as much as we need databases on what terrorists do
«It is very crucial to set the record straight by making it crystal clear that contrary to this misleading report, the Boko Haram terrorists do not hold or control any Local Government Area in Borno or in the North - East as claimed by some elements.
I hope that the majority of Americans are smart enough to understand that the acts of a few terrorists don't reflect the beliefs of the majority of Muslims.
«Terrorists don't differentiate.in general terrorists will massacre or murder anyone who stands in their way.
Airlines must resist giving in to passenger «paranoia» about terrorism to ensure that real terrorists do not succeed in their aim of spreading fear across the UK, an MP has warned.
As the blessed children of the Most High, it is our duty to let the world know that terrorists don't vote,» it stated.
These terrorists do nt care if they bomb a mosque or a temple, all they care is about their agenda.
Actual situation in the de-christianized, bored West: If foreign terrorists don't give threats, the junk - minded youth will destroy everything their parents have built up.
Even terrorists do the same.
Terrorists don't need divine intervention; they are deceived into believing they are divine intervention.
The difference is that the US is complicit in jewish holy war against the local muslims so the jewish terrorists don't need to blow oneself to kill their enemies.
All you have to do is keep quiet and let the terrorists do your dirty work of converting the world by sword and blood letting.
What an argument, Oklahoma bomber did not do his act in the «glory of god», he never shouted AOA like all terrorist doing freely around the world specially in 9/11 and 11/26 in Mumbai.
But then, is the proper response to just let the terrorist do whatever he wants?
The rioting terrorists did.
No different than what terrorist do to children to get them to join.
but that demonstrates my point: either what these terrorists did is objectively wrong, or you must embrace it could be right in certain circu.mstances.
Objective compassion: I identify with your suffering... what these terrorists did was wrong.
wait till the kid turns 3, the parents will probably tell they they are all sinners,, reduce the victim as muslim terrorist do.
Just reading this nonsense makes me realize that the terrorists did indeed succeed 10 years ago.
DHQ: Boko Haram terrorists did not kill 150 in Yobe.
He pledged to not speak about the issue himself, in hopes of ascertaining «if this exercise would help New Yorkers and Americans remember that the terrorists didn't care who we were when they attacked us and we should think a lot about the fact that in many ways, we were all victims.»
«It's an important event in the revitalization and the reconstruction of lower Manhattan and putting behind us all the terrible damage that the terrorists did on that fateful day,» said U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler at a ribbon - cutting ceremony for the stop.
And once again, that terrorist didn't succeed.
Plutonium could be a horrific weapon, even if terrorists did not have enough to construct a nuclear bomb.
The advanced imaging technologies now used in U.S. airports would catch anyone using the same strategies the 9/11 terrorists did — «but realize nothing, and I mean nothing, is as important as trained professionals watching for something out of place,» Marpet notes.
Unlike Four Lions, Chris Morris's empathetic and genuinely funny comedy about suicide bombers, Top Floor, Left Wing pivots around the serious notion that there's such a thing as defensible or simply respectable terrorist actions while laughing at the concept that the terrorist you don't know is often more dangerous than the one you do.
She seems to suggest that our concern for Americans is supposed to supersede our concern for humanity, and so she's privileging symbolism over individual people, which is what the terrorists did.
It's magical thinking: If we defend against what the terrorists did last time, we'll somehow defend against what they do one time.
When a terrorist does their worst, the insured travelers are in a much better position to catch a ride out of the area where the terrorist action has occurred.

Not exact matches

But that story is about what to do after a nuclear weapon blows up by surprise, such as in a terrorist attack — the goal is to limit exposure to radioactive fallout that arrives minutes after a detonation.
Immunotherapy, in short, helps the body do the dirty work of defending itself against homegrown terrorists.
Islamist terrorist groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda are also involved in the war, but even as terrorist groups» grip on certain areas of the country fades, the war between the rebels and Assad doesn't seem likely to stop anytime soon.
Lee / Trumka: The AFL - CIO has unequivocally denounced the actions of bigoted domestic terrorists in Charlottesville and called on the President to do the same.
While we do block terrorist (e.g. ISIS - related) bots and channels, we will not block anybody who peacefully expresses alternative opinions.
That didn't just mean leveling Chechen cities and going after terrorists, it meant dehumanizing the Chechens.
Lyman Stone put it bluntly in an article for The Federalist: «Most reasonable people would agree that banning people who have never been associated with any terrorist attack in our country (say, Bhutanese Hindus) doesn't make much sense.»
Throughout his campaign he has reiterated his views on torture which included doing a «hell of a lot worse» than waterboarding, and going after terrorists» families.
The line between vigilante and terrorist seems to be very thin indeed, especially in a game where the main character is supposed to be heroic yet at the same time can do some amazingly unheroic things.
This makeshift fighting force has a much greater interest in defeating the terrorist threat in the region than does its professional soldiering counterpart.
The Trump administration has argued that the ban is necessary to prevent potential terrorists from entering the country and is not discriminatory because the text of the order does not mention any particular religion.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z