Sentences with phrase «test anxiety scales»

However, scores on the SRLTAS were expected to be positively correlated with scores from the administration of other established test anxiety scales.

Math test anxiety was evaluated via a translated version of the revised version of the «Children's Test Anxiety Scale (CTAS)» (Nyroos, Korhonen, Linnanmaki, & Svens - Liavag, 2012).

Note: ATQ, Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire; CAS, Child Assessment Schedule; CCL - D, Cognitions Checklist Depression Subscale; CHS, Children's Hopelessness Scale; CMFQ, Children's Medical Fears Questionnaire; FDI, Functional Disability Inventory; GASC, General Anxiety Scale for Children; HAM - D, Hamilton Depression Rating Scales; HARS - R, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale - Revised; IAQ, Information Acquisition Questionnaire; PILL, Pennebaker Inventory for Limbic Languidness; SCAS, Spence Children's Anxiety Scale; STAI, State - Trait Anxiety Inventory; TASC, Test Anxiety Scale for Children.

As well as several theoretically - based instruments that have been used primarily in research including the FRIEDBEN Test Anxiety Scale (the FTA)(Friedman & Bendas - Jacob, 1997), which is a three dimensional, 23 - item measure that targets cognitive and physiological aspects of test anxiety with consideration of social denigration.

Examples include those used as screening instruments in practice with clients and students such as the ten item Westside Test Anxiety Scale (e.g., WTAS; Driscoll, 2007).

SRLTAS = Self - Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale; MSLQTA = Motivated Strategies for Learning Test Anxiety; TAS = Test Anxiety Scale.

Four studies report the development and psychometric properties of the new Self - Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale (SRLTAS).

SRLTAS: The 28 - item Self - Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale was administered.

SHS = Self - Handicapping Scale, GES = Generalized Self - Efficacy Scale, SRTLAS = Self - Regulated Learning Test Anxiety Scale.

The MSLQ, often used as a general measure of self - regulated learning, contains a 5 item test anxiety scale.

Not exact matches

More disturbing still, the «anxiety / insecurity woozle» was based on three questions taken from a validated test that assesses infants» readiness to begin talking — a three item «scale» the authors designed and interpreted as a measure of infant anxiety and insecurity.

On the respective scales utilized to test anxiety and depression, 41 percent of graduate students scored as having moderate to severe anxiety while 39 percent scored in the moderate to severe depression range.

The participants took tests of their brains» executive functioning skills, such as inhibition and selective attention, and rated themselves on scales for depression and social anxiety.

Researchers employed two psychological tests, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS).

To determine the test characteristics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D) as a screening test for depressive and anxiety disorders in older adults.

Grouped t tests were used to compare the mean change in scores in the control and intervention groups where the differences were normally distributed (ECBI intensity score, SDQ total score, PSI parent child interaction, and parent domains), and Mann - Whitney U tests for the mean change in scores in the two groups where the differences were not normally distributed (ECBI problem score, SDQ conduct, hyperactivity, emotional, peer and prosocial scales, GHQ somatic anxiety, social, depression and total scores, PSI difficult child domain and total score, and SES).

AAI, Adult Attachment Interview; AFFEX, System for Identifying Affect Expression by Holistic Judgement; AIM, Affect Intensity Measure; AMBIANCE, Atypical Maternal Behaviour Instrument for Assessment and Classification; ASCT, Attachment Story Completion Task; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BEST, Borderline Evaluation of Severity over Time; BPD, borderline personality disorder; BPVS - II, British Picture Vocabulary Scale II; CASQ, Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire; CBCL, Child Behaviour Checklist; CDAS - R, Children's Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale - Revised; CDEQ, Children's Depressive Experiences Questionnaire; CDIB, Child Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines; CGAS, Child Global Assessment Schedule; CRSQ, Children's Response Style Questionnaire; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; DASS, Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales; DERS, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; DIB - R, Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; EA, Emotional Availability Scales; ECRS, Experiences in Close Relationships Scale; EMBU, Swedish acronym for Own Memories Concerning Upbringing; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; FES, Family Environment Scale; FSS, Family Satisfaction Scale; FTRI, Family Trauma and Resilience Interview; IBQ - R, Infant Behaviour Questionnaire, Revised; IPPA, Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment; K - SADS, Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School - Age Children; KSADS - E, Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia - Episodic Version; MMD, major depressive disorder; PACOTIS, Parental Cognitions and Conduct Toward the Infant Scale; PPQ, Perceived Parenting Quality Questionnaire; PD, personality disorder; PPVT - III, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition; PSI - SF, Parenting Stress Index Short Form; RSSC, Reassurance - Seeking Scale for Children; SCID - II, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM - IV; SCL -90-R, Symptom Checklist 90 Revised; SCQ, Social Communication Questionnaire; SEQ, Children's Self - Esteem Questionnaire; SIDP - IV, Structured Interview for DSM - IV Personality; SPPA, Self - Perception Profile for Adolescents; SSAGA, Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism; TCI, Temperament and Character Inventory; YCS, Youth Chronic Stress Interview; YSR, Youth Self - Report.

The DIF test indicated that 2/11, 2/12 /, 4/13 and 2/10 items in anxiety, depression, study and sociality scales, respectively, showed significant (p < 0.001) DIF with respect to gender (table 4).

These items comprise a scale of the motivation component of the MSLQ inventory, and as suggested by the authors, scholars have administered the TA scale independently to assess college students» test anxiety within a self - regulated learning framework (Credé & Phillips, 2011; Fitch, Marshall, & McCarthy, 2012).

Unlike previous measures that targeted the emotionality and worry elements of TA, or TA generally; the intent of SRLTAS scale development was to examine dimensions of test anxiety not previously addressed.

At baseline (start of study) and 2 and 5 years after completion of the rehabilitation program all participants were evaluated in terms of sick leave, pain rating (Visual Analogue Scale), the Disability Rating Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Stress Test.

Measures utilized include the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th Edition, the Expressive Vocabulary Test, 2nd Edition, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM — IV, child and parent versions (ADIS - C / P), the Clinical Global Impression — Severity (CGI - S), the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBDRS), the Behavior Assessment System for Children — Second Edition (BASC), the Parent Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Clinical Global Impression — Improvement (CGI - I).

The following aspects of the BIQ - SF were subjected to a psychometric evaluation: (a) the hypothesized six - correlated factors structure of the scale was tested by means of a confirmatory factor analysis, (b) various types of reliability were investigated including the internal consistency, test — retest reliability, and cross-informant agreement, and (c) several aspects of the validity were explored such as the relations with anxiety and internalizing (i.e., convergent validity) and externalizing (i.e., divergent validity) symptoms as well as the relations between BIQ - SF scores of parents and teachers and laboratory observations of an inhibited temperament (i.e., predictive validity).

Two measurement instruments for dental anxiety, the Dental Anxiety Scale and the Dental Fear Survey, were distributed in German translation to 137 mostly dental phobic patients in a dental fear clinic in Hamburg and tested for reliability and vaanxiety, the Dental Anxiety Scale and the Dental Fear Survey, were distributed in German translation to 137 mostly dental phobic patients in a dental fear clinic in Hamburg and tested for reliability and vaAnxiety Scale and the Dental Fear Survey, were distributed in German translation to 137 mostly dental phobic patients in a dental fear clinic in Hamburg and tested for reliability and validity.

Accordingly, we used the ASEBA Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-- oriented scales for anxiety and affective symptoms (depression symptoms), and tested interactions between these clusters of symptoms and externalizing symptoms.

A sample of 16 clinically anxious children (age 8 — 12, eight girls / boys) was assessed for emotion understanding (Test of Emotion Comprehension), anxiety (Screening for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders - Revised and Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule), emotion dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) and attachment security (Security anxiety (Screening for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders - Revised and Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule), emotion dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) and attachment security (Security Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders - Revised and Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule), emotion dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) and attachment security (Security Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule), emotion dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) and attachment security (Security Scale).

Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach.

Using the Maudsley Marital Satisfaction Scale (MMQ: Arrindell et al. 1983), on which a high score indicates marital dissatisfaction, Verhaak et al. (2005a, b) reported a positive association between marital dissatisfaction and change in anxiety and depression both 4 weeks following, and 6 months following a negative pregnancy test.