Most controversially of all, if the government believes that working families should keep more of their earnings (to spend more effectively than government can) then why means -
test child benefit - the only remaining recognition in the tax system of the cost of raising a family - in order to preserve free bus rides and winter fuel payments to well - off over 60s?
Mr Osborne said he did not want to means -
test child benefit because it would make the system too complicated.
The Financial Times suggested that in order to find additional cuts of # 30 - 40bn, the incoming government might have to cut public sector pay by 5 per cent, freeze benefits for a year, means -
test child benefit, abolish winter fuel payments, and cut free TV licences and bus passes.
Or to means
test child benefit, rather than giving «generous subsidies» to well off families?
«At the time, people looked at our plan for more generous and means -
tested child benefits, tax increases for the rich and tax cuts for the middle class as a bit of a curiosity,» he said, according to a copy of his remarks.
It is depressing — if predictable — that resistance to means -
testing child benefit is greatest among those who need it least.
At his first Prime Minister's Questions on 13 October 2010, he raised questions about the government's announced removal of a non-means
tested child benefit.
The document set out # 8 billion of savings and included proposals to limit child benefit and child tax credits to a family's first two children, as well as means -
testing child benefit.
Not exact matches
Besides, most
child - care benefits in Canada are already means - tested, including municipally and provincially run child - care subsidy systems, as well as the federal government's Universal Child Care Ben
child - care
benefits in Canada are already means -
tested, including municipally and provincially run
child - care subsidy systems, as well as the federal government's Universal Child Care Ben
child - care subsidy systems, as well as the federal government's Universal
Child Care Ben
Child Care
Benefit.
First, there has been the proposed creation of the income -
tested Canada
Child Benefit and the cut in the middle tax rate from 22 % to 20.5 %.
The new Canada
Child Benefit (CCB) unveiled in the 2016 federal Budget has been widely supported by progressives and anti poverty activists who have long favoured the expansion of income tested child tax cre
Child Benefit (CCB) unveiled in the 2016 federal Budget has been widely supported by progressives and anti poverty activists who have long favoured the expansion of income
tested child tax cre
child tax credits.
Yet low income lines and family income
tested programs such as the Guaranteed Income Supplement and
child tax
benefits do assume couples share income with each other.
I am (a) a delusional schizophrenic; (b) a naïve
child, too young to know that that is silly (c) an ignorant farmer from Sudan who never had the
benefit of even a fifth grade education; or (d) your average Christian Millions and millions of Catholics believe that bread and wine turns into the actual flesh and blood of a dead Jew from 2,000 years ago because: (a) there are obvious visible changes in the condiments after the Catholic priest does his hocus pocus; (b)
tests have confirmed a divine presence in the bread and wine; (c) now and then their god shows up and confirms this story; or (d) their religious convictions tell them to blindly accept this completely fvcking absurd nonsense.
Learning to relax has many
benefits from easing your
child into sleep, to learning how to calm down before a
test, to knowing how to soothe himself when he's upset.
To see if your gifted
child could
benefit from some summer programming, ask the school district if they'd be willing to
test your
child with the end - of - the - year performance exams for the year your
child is skipping.
However, as we often do these very same
tests on
children, even small babies, and the potential loss of
benefits if the mother stops breastfeeding are considerable, the mother should, in my opinion, continue breastfeeding.
But with increasing dissatisfaction over the high - stakes
testing currently consuming mainstream education; the growing recognition of the many
benefits a
child receives through experiences with art, movement, and nature; a concern over a reliance on technology by younger and younger students; and the news that leaders in the high - tech industry are touting the lifelong
benefits of low - tech Waldorf schools in educating their own
children, more and more parents and educators are taking a closer look at the Waldorf approach and what it has to offer.
The
benefits continued years later; researchers ran cognitive
tests in the older
children and found «increased language performance, visual reception and motor control performance.»
However, as we often do these very same
tests on
children, even small babies, and the potential loss of
benefits if the mother stops breastfeeding are considerable, the mother should continue breastfeeding.
Millions of
children have already
benefited from this time -
tested program!
All of the toys in this jumper have passed the
test of the Institute of
Child Development, so you are ensured about its safety and
benefits toward the development of your infant.
But there's also a secondary
benefit: If you find out that your
child is worried about basketball tryouts or an upcoming science
test, you can be sensitive to that area and offer more encouragement — and devote more time to helping him practice or study.
Welfare reforms are labours, we know Ms Cooper stated she was looking at
child benefits but it would cost to much, in other words she was going to means
test.
It replaces personal tax allowances, and most means -
tested benefits including jobseeker's allowance,
child benefit, the basic state pension and tax credits.
To reduce the workload of the new
child support body, estranged couples on means -
tested benefits would no longer be obliged to use its services, and they would be offered advice to help them find a voluntary solution.
If we are serious about hitting the 2002
child poverty target, and we reject means -
testing, what does that mean for
child benefit?
If
child benefit is means -
tested, it brands the family that receives it as poor.
It's precisely because
child benefit is universal and not means -
tested that it lays down a marker of mutuality in society that has a value that must not be sacrificed.
• What I've picked up from the Liberal Democrat conference so far is that Nick Clegg wants to cut the pay of classroom assistants, home helps, lollipop men and women and other low - paid public sector workers, to means
test middle - class mums to decide whether they deserve
child benefit, and to keep tuition fees.
Journalist Angela Epstein defends her view that
child benefit should not be means
tested.
It's often accompanied by a preoccupation with the position of one - earner couples within the tax and
benefit system, and a certain sympathy for universalism and hostility to means -
testing: hence the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail's hostility to George Osborne's treatment of
child benefit.
Require «able - bodied» Medicaid enrollees to pay
child support and participate in
child - paternity
testing or face losing
benefits.
David Cameron's pledges in the election, No. 10 feels, rule out the full - scale assault on the principle of universality that the Lib Dems argued for, such as means
testing benefits like
child benefit to cut them back for better off families.
, free bus passes, eye
tests,
child benefit (take it away from top - rate taxpayers?)
Basic pensions, long squeezed by successive governments, were treated well, but
child benefit was frozen, housing and invalidity
benefit battered,
child trust funds abolished, tweaks and tougher
testing imposed elsewhere.
Former leader Charles Kennedy rebelled against the leader's desire to scrap the unaffordable policy of scrapping tuition fees and Steve Webb MP rebelled against the suggestion that
child benefit might be means -
tested.
Similarly,
child benefit should be means -
tested, and the savings applied to a government matching programme for
child trust funds for the lowest income groups.
The budget report said the extra funding for the means -
tested benefit was «valuable support to families with
children».
The method must now be
tested on larger animals before it can be tried in humans, but the hope is that tissue - engineered repairs for congenital diaphragm malformations will be at least as effective as current surgical options with the added
benefit of growing with
children throughout their lives.
That's according to William Neal of West Virginia University in Morgantown, and colleagues, who say that current methods of only
testing children if high cholesterol runs in the family misses a third of those who would
benefit from treatment.
The new research builds on two previous studies that found the two programs
benefitted children in early elementary school, boosting third - grade reading and math -
test scores and reducing third - grade special education placements.
The study also found that
children with certain physical anomalies were more likely to have genetic mutations, findings that may help identify
children who could
benefit most from genetic
testing.
«Newer genetic
testing methods may provide
benefit for
children with suspected autism.»
Moreover, we can now do a simple blood
test to see which
children in the family are at risk of cancer and may
benefit from cancer screening, and which have not inherited the mutation and so are not at increased risk of cancer.»
The consensus of the committee was that well - designed and implemented assessment can actually
benefit children, but flawed
testing can result in harm, Snow said.
Local parents of elementary - age kids have set out to make Hogg a school they and their neighbors want to send their kids to, which means higher
test scores, tighter discipline, and a college - prep curriculum - changes they believe will
benefit all
children, not just their own.
CAMBRIDGE, MA — An analysis of a new report by a committee of the National Research Council (NRC), the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences, shows that average student gains from the No
Child Left Behind (NCLB)
test - based accountability measures would yield, over the next 80 years, a national economic
benefit of approximately $ 14 trillion.
These experiments may not yield immediate
benefits in terms of increased
test scores, but they might serve the needs of individual
children and help us find promising breakthroughs that could someday enjoy mass appeal and application.
So they see virtually no
benefit from
test - based reforms and see significant impingement on control over their
child's education.
He wants to defend the practices that he thinks
benefit children, including the practice of closing schools of choice with low
test scores.