The ratings are based on evaluations of how three - point lap and shoulder belts fit a child - size
test dummy seated in the booster on a stationary test fixture.
Boosters earn a rating of BEST BET, GOOD BET, Check Fit or Not Recommended, based on a protocol that involves measuring how three - point lap and shoulder belts fit a child - size
test dummy seated in the booster on a stationary test fixture under four conditions that span the range of safety belt configurations in passenger vehicles.
Boosters earn a rating of BEST BET, GOOD BET, Check Fit or Not Recommended, based on a protocol that involves measuring how three - point lap and shoulder belts fit a child - size
test dummy seated in the booster on a stationary test fixture.
Not exact matches
The nonprofit says the driver's side
seat belt did not have enough tension to protect the crash
test dummy's head.
Many car
seats that passed the standard sled
test, failed in actual car
tests, as the baby
dummy's head hit the front
seat causing high injury ratings.
Virtual Simulation Virtual Simulation involves digitally created car
seat models and anthropomorphic
testing devices (ATDs or child crash -
test dummies).
A few minutes on YouTube watching videos of
test dummy babies flying through the windshield because their expired car
seat failed will quickly teach you the importance of NOT using an expired car
seat.
They have to pass the exact same
tests with the same
dummies as the infant
seats.
When you install the car
seat using methods not outlined in the instruction manual, you are, in essence, using your child as the crash
test dummy.
Something that would greatly benefit car
seat research was first used in 1949, a crash
test dummy.
They crash
test the
seats with what you buy them with and so if it doesn't have it that means it hasn't been crash
tested and I don't think that any of us wants our babies to be crash
test dummies so it's just best to avoid them.
They properly installed the car
seats and then conducted 12 rear impact crash
tests of moderate the severity with
dummies strapped into the car
seats, measuring how each crash would affect each body part.
Booster fit (no - back): A rating that reflects a booster
seat's ability to correctly position the lap and shoulder belts in various
test vehicles using a child - sized
dummy, when used as a backless booster.
That's why at Consumer Reports, we evaluate the structural integrity of booster car
seats in our simulated crash
tests and how the
seat belt fits on a
test dummy representing an average - sized 6 - year - old.
This first launch of the Falcon Heavy carried SpaceX CEO Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster as its
test cargo, with a
dummy nicknamed Starman in the
seat.
Marring those results is a safety concern stemming from the side - impact crash -
test results: During the
test, the cabin door panel hit the torso of the
dummy in the rear
seat, increasing the chance of injury.
Add new
test dummies to the evaluation process — including a weighted model to investigate booster
seat limitations.
The
dummies used in the crash
tests roughly correspond with a 18 - month - old and a three - year - old — these sit in child restraints on the back
seat.
Likewise, in the side barrier
test, the head of the
dummy representing a 10 - year - old child,
seated behind the driver, struck the roof frame in the Mercedes - Benz C - Class Cabriolet as the side airbag did not fully cover the impact area.
Details: During
testing using unbelted, out - of - position 3 - year - old and 6 - year - old
test dummies in the front passenger
seat were subjected to above - regulated axial neck force.
This is because small differences in occupants» heights or in their
seating positions compared with the
test dummies could result in a hard contact and high risk of serious head injury.
In the side impact
test for both models, measures taken from both the driver
dummy and the passenger
dummy seated in the rear
seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this one.
IIHS
tests vehicle
seats and head restraints with a special
dummy that has a realistic spine.
Dynamic
testing of
seats / head restraints requires a
dummy with a realistic spine and neck.
In the frontal offset
test, the Touran scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year
dummy, despite the fact that the height adjuster broke on the restraint in which the 3 year
dummy was
seated.
The
test assesses how well the
seats support the torso, neck and head of a BioRID
dummy.
The Institute's dynamic ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are derived from two
seat design parameters (peak acceleration of the
dummy's torso and time from impact initiation to head restraint contact with the
dummy's head) plus neck tension and shear forces recorded on BioRID during the
test.
A vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III
dummy in the driver
seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled
dummy movement during the
test.
Seats with good or acceptable restraint geometry then are
tested dynamically using a
dummy that measures forces on the neck.
The newly introduced side - pole crash
test exclusively uses the small female crash
dummy in a front
seating position.
The side - barrier crash
test now implements a combination of male and female crash
test dummies, with the male positioned in a front
seating position (as before) and the small female (new) in a rear
seating position.
Revised for 2011, the frontal crash safety
test incorporates a crash
dummy representative of a small - size female in the front passenger's
seat and, as before, an average - size male crash
dummy in the driver's
seat.
The driver's
seat became detached from the structure and moved sideways, together with the lower part of the
test dummy.
Seat / head restraint combinations with good or acceptable geometry are
tested dynamically using a
dummy that measures forces on the neck.
In the first
test, the
seat belt allowed far too much forward movement of the
dummy to the extent that its head came close to hitting the intruding A-pillar.
These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both
tests, as are rear passenger
dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made affecting structure or rear
seat occupants.
In the Institute's
test, injury measures recorded on crash
test dummies in the driver
seat and rear passenger
seat were low in every category.
The manufacturers supplied information on basic vehicle and
test parameters, measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury data recorded on a
dummy representing an average - size man in the driver
seat, and video of the
tests.
In the frontal offset
test, forward movement of the 10 year
dummy was excessive and the head hit the back of the
seat in front.
In the second
test, the
dummy's head brushed the window sill as it rebounded toward the driver
seat.
The
test involves placing a
dummy, representative of a 172 - pound man, into the driver's
seat and another in the rear passenger
seat of a vehicle, then slamming a barrier into the driver's side at 38.5 mph.
When
test dummies fitted with sensors were strapped into
seating systems designed for three year old and one and a half year old children, reassuringly at the moment of impact these «children» were all registered as maintaining stable positions with minimal head movements.
In both
tests, there were problems with the
seats occupied by the rear passenger
dummies.
A 50th percentile male Hybrid III
dummy is belted in the driver
seat (see «Small overlap crashes: New consumer -
test program aims for even safer vehicles,» Aug. 14, 2012).
In the second
test, the
dummy's head contacted the frontal airbag but started to move off the left side because the
seat belt allowed excessive forward excursion of the head and torso.
The
test would use the THOR 50th percentile male
dummy in the driver
seat and the modified Hybrid III 5th percentile female
dummy in the right rear
seat.
From 2015 Euro NCAP added a new restraint
test, a full frontal impact against a rigid barrier at just over 30mph with small female
dummies in the driver's
seat and rear passenger
seat.
In both
tests, the
seat belt allowed far too much forward movement of the
dummy to the extent that its head hit the steering wheel hard through the airbag (first
test shown).
In the
test, 25 % of a vehicle's front end on the driver side strikes a 1.5 - metre - high rigid barrier at 64 km / h with a 50th percentile male Hybrid III
dummy belted in the driver
seat.
In the first
test, the
dummy's head contacted the frontal airbag but started to slide off the left side because the
seat belt allowed excessive forward excursion of the head and torso.