The process, predicted more than four decades ago, provides a new way to
test fundamental physics.
This paves the way for a global network of synchronised clocks for
testing fundamental physics.
Not exact matches
«When more - powerful detectors provide us with more observations,» Mészáros said, «we also will be able to use Fast Radio Bursts as a probe of their host galaxies, of the space between galaxies, of the cosmic - web structure of the universe, and as a
test of
fundamental physics.»
Zhu concluded: «The gravitational constant is a
fundamental constant of
physics, so it is important to
test this basic assumption using objects at different places, times, and gravitational conditions.
«Unique study
tests fundamental laws of
physics.»
But we may be unlucky and, as you know, for example, in particle
physics, we have this amazing standard model which has survived the
test of, unfortunately, of all experiments, over the last 30 years without really telling us yet what the
fundamental physics is and we are hoping that the Large Hadron Collider will tell us the answer to that.
A more finely honed picture of the center of the galaxy could even provide a
test bed for the
fundamental assumptions of Einsteinian
physics.
Ironically, this love of logic was severely
tested when he later embarked on an undergraduate degree in
physics at the University of Surrey and learned that, at the
fundamental level where quantum laws take over, everyday rules fly out the window.
Being a physicist by formation, I am especially attracted by two aspects in these fields: exploring the overlap between neuroscience and
physics, where functional processes can be
tested regarding possible underlying
fundamental mechanisms (e.g. quantum biology) and the application of experimental techniques which go beyond standard neuroscience approaches (nonlinear microscopy, optogenetics).
This thematic series is dedicated to all aspects of space - based quantum technologies from
fundamental physics to quantum communication protocols including proposals for new space - based quantum experiments as well as terrestrial experimental
tests of new quantum technologies for space deployment
Space - based
tests of
fundamental physics have a long history, from early
tests of general relativity to more recent missions such as gravity probe B and proposed missions to
test the equivalence principle (STE - QUEST) and gravitational decoherence (MAQRO).
«Radio telescopes from around the world... will work in concert to
test some of
physics» most
fundamental theories.»
The Wide - Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) would launch in 2020 as one of the next generation of telescopes that should target the early universe, search for nearby habitable planets and
test the boundaries of
fundamental physics, according to the Astro2010 Decadal Survey by the National Academy of Sciences.
that should target the early universe, search for nearby habitable planets and
test the boundaries of
fundamental physics, according to the
Therefore, the Galactic center provides a unique
fundamental -
physics laboratory for experimental
tests of BH accretion and theories of gravity in their most extreme limits.
We know more about Earth's climate than any other planet, but using this knowledge to predict weather and climate on other planets is a true
test of how well we actually understand the
fundamental physics.
Most importantly, I feel as if I've contributed to something that is
fundamental science (e.g.
physics and physical chemistry), that I expect will stand the
test of time (unlike the climate modeling exercise du jour) and hope will define theoretical cloud
physics at the beginning of the 21st century.
Why would you jump to the conclusion that the
physics textbooks are wrong on a very
fundamental and basic matter of
physics and that the scientific consensus is wrong in using equations that have been
tested by scientists and engineers and used to build all sorts of technology rather than acknowledge that your own knowledge may be what is limited here?