Not exact matches
Each year
public school children are subjected to standardized
tests to measure their achievements
in comparison to all other
public -
schooled kids.
Join Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones at the New Possibilities for
Public Education: Rally for Kids and Schools as they stand with educators and parents dedicated to saving public schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against te
Public Education: Rally for
Kids and
Schools as they stand with educators and parents dedicated to saving public schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
Schools as they stand with educators and parents dedicated to saving
public schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against te
public schools and talk about how to fight back against the test and punish regime rampant in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
schools and talk about how to fight back against the
test and punish regime rampant
in schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against t
schools, the privatization of education, and the attacks against teachers
Only
in D.C. can one
test whether the Hyde model can be applied to a
public school rather than to a private residential one and to a
school that serves disadvantaged
kids rather than financially privileged ones.
I've come to view annual
testing of
kids in reading and math, and the disaggregating and
public reporting of their performance at the
school (and district) level, as the single best feature of NCLB and the one that most needs preserving.
In the piece, headlined «Alternative» Education: Using Charter Schools to Hide Dropouts and Game the System, ProPublica reporter Heather Vogell describes how traditional schools and districts are pushing kids into low - cost, low - quality alternative programs in order to hide dropouts from the public and boost test scores and graduation rate
In the piece, headlined «Alternative» Education: Using Charter
Schools to Hide Dropouts and Game the System, ProPublica reporter Heather Vogell describes how traditional schools and districts are pushing kids into low - cost, low - quality alternative programs in order to hide dropouts from the public and boost test scores and graduation
Schools to Hide Dropouts and Game the System, ProPublica reporter Heather Vogell describes how traditional
schools and districts are pushing kids into low - cost, low - quality alternative programs in order to hide dropouts from the public and boost test scores and graduation
schools and districts are pushing
kids into low - cost, low - quality alternative programs
in order to hide dropouts from the public and boost test scores and graduation rate
in order to hide dropouts from the
public and boost
test scores and graduation rates.
Her
kids go to
public school in New York, one of the first states to
test students on Common Core.
Dr. Thompson's book, A Teacher's Tale: Learning, Loving and Listening to Our
Kids, is a case study of the unintended negative effects of
test - driven, competition - driven reform on an inner city high
school in the Oklahoma City Public School S
school in the Oklahoma City
Public School S
School System.
You might think this is a relatively easy proposition to evaluate — just compare whether charter
school kids do better on
tests than those
in public schools.
There was some bad news for charter
schools in a government report last week that said children
in those
schools didn't do as well on national
tests scores as
kids in public schools.
Moreover,
in practice, the «choice» program has been plagued by lack of accountability (no state
testing requirements), fraud (private operators taking off with the state aid check, leaving the
kids without a
school to go to, and MPS to try to deal with it), refusal to accept handicapped children, continued leeching off
public schools for lab courses, and — most significantly — absolutely no educational advantage whatsoever for the «choice» students compared to their
public school counterparts, which was the ostensible justification for this whole fiasco
in the first place.
In a visit last month to a
public school where 4 percent of students passed last year's math
tests, and that shares a building with a Success
school where 96 percent of the students passed, the city's
schools chancellor, Carmen Fariña, said, «We would like to be at that percentage, but we keep all our
kids from the day they walk into the building.»
The poor - performing
kids will either stay
in, or be forced back into, the
public schools, where they will lower the
testing scores.
Reading
tests — of the standardized variety that
kids in public schools take — are certainly supposed to
test reading skills.
But many
public school teachers fear that the best charters are skimming off the best students, leaving them with the least motivated and hardest - to - reach
kids — and amplifying the gaps
in test scores.
I can't understand why
kids are so reluctant to use easy cost saving measures like community college (instruction just as good as four year),
testing in lieu of classes for credit, summer classes, good
public schools instead of private, online courses (more convenient but NOT easier).