Sentences with phrase «test refusal rights»
A Motor Vehicle Department hearing will be scheduled to determine whether 1) police had proper cause to seize the vehicle being operated by the accused, 2) whether police had sufficient probable cause to believe operator of the vehicle was intoxicated and driving while impaired in Hudson Valley 3) whether police properly advising the accused of their breath test refusal rights.
http://www.westchestercountynylaw.com/ Not exact matches
Nolan's bill (A. 6777) enables children to be exempted from the tests but it does not require schools notify parents of their right of refusal without penalty as Tedisco's measure does.
Tedisco, Graf, Murray and Ra are sponsoring the «Common Core Parental Refusal Act» (A. 6025 / S.4161) to require that school districts notify parents of their rights to refuse to have their children in grades 3 - 8 participate in the Common Core standardized tests.
Assemblyman Jim Tedisco (R,C,I - Glenville), Senator Terrence Murphy (R,C,I - Jefferson Valley), Assemblyman Ed Ra (R - Franklin Square), Assemblyman Michael P. Kearns (D - Buffalo), Senator Joseph A. Griffo (R,C,I - Rome) and Senator George Latimer (D - Rye) today joined with parents, students and educators in Albany to call for passage of bi-partisan legislation they are sponsoring, the «Common Core Parental Refusal Act» (A. 6025 / S.4161) to require that school districts notify parents of their rights to refuse to have their children in grades 3 - 8 participate in the Common Core standardized tests.
Tedisco, a former public school special education teacher, is the sponsor of the bi-partisan Common Core Parental Refusal Act (A. 6025 / S.4161), to require that school districts notify parents of their rights to refuse without penalty to have their children in grades 3 - 8 participate in the Common Core standardized tests.
«The Common Core Parental Refusal Act protects the rights of parents to have their children refuse to take these high stakes tests and it ensures that students, teachers and schools are not penalized or rewarded for participation — or lack thereof — in the exams.
Author of Common Core Parental Refusal Act says Assembly Majority bill falls short by not requiring schools to notify parents of their rights to opt their kids out of Common Core tests
Assemblyman Jim Tedisco (R,C,I - Glenville), who was the top vote getter in the Assembly on the Stop Common Core ballot line in 2014, today announced new legislation he is introducing, the «Common Core Parental Refusal Act» to require that school districts notify parents of their rights to refuse to have their children in grades 3 - 8 participate in the Common Core standardized tests.
When considering the refusal (opt - out) issue it is critically important that parents understand that there is no federal or state law that eliminates a parent's right to refuse to allow their children to take the SBAC test.
Mayor de Blasio has failed to comply with a 2015 unanimous city council resolution calling on the NYC DOE to inform all parents of their rights regarding test refusal at the beginning of each school year and in fact this spring the NYC DOE removed language from guidance instructing schools to respect parents» right to opt out until faced by questions from the City Council Education Committee.
You are not required to admit your pet to the hospital or to allow any testing or treatment that you do not approve, and you have the right to be informed of the consequences of refusal of treatment or testing.
You are not required to admit your horse to the hospital or to allow any testing or treatment that you do not approve, and you have the right to be informed of the consequences of refusal of treatment or testing.
The Dano ruling was handed down in the same week that the complaint authority of the European Social Charter, the European Social Rights Committee (ESRC), took two decisions in collective complaints procedures against the Netherlands about its refusal to grant shelter and emergency assistance to foreign nationals without residence status (Council of European Churches v. the Netherlands; No. 90/2013) and about the practice of local councils applying a local connection test before giving shelter to the homeless (FEANTSA v. the Netherlands: No. 86/2013)-RRB-.
We have provided additional subject pages on Curing a Refusal, the Confusion Doctrine, Out of State Refusal Convictions, Right to an Independent Chemical Test, and Division of Motor Vehicle Administrative Suspension for Refusal.
The Board rejected the employer's argument that the employee's refusal constituted insubordination or the equivalent of a positive test result, finding instead that the employer had penalized the employee «for refusing to waive his right to representation.»
Therapeutic Jurisprudence Index Child Custody Evaluations — Reevaluating the Evaluators Custody Evaluation Guidelines — Reevaluating (mirror) Right of First Refusal in Parenting Plans Child Custody Evaluators «In Their Own Words» Parenting Coordination, a bad idea Parenting Coordinator Practical Considerations Those Joint Custody Studies Psychological testing, MMPI2, in child custody evaluations
Therapeutic Jurisprudence Index Discovery of Psych Test Data Coaching for the MMPI - 2 How to handle the Rorschach in a forensic evaluation Child Custody Evaluations — Reevaluating the Evaluators Right of First Refusal in Parenting Plans Child Custody Evaluators «In Their Own Words» Parenting Coordination, a bad idea Parenting Coordinator Practical Considerations Those Joint Custody Studies
Therapeutic Jurisprudence Index Child Custody Evaluations — Reevaluating the Evaluators Right of First Refusal in Parenting Plans Florida Handbook on Discovery Custody Evaluator Testing: Discovery Issues Are Psychologists Hiding Evidence?
To test the effectiveness of the Fail - Proof Consequence, ask yourself, «Will I be able to follow through with this in the face of my child's potential out - right defiance and refusal to comply?»
This will require attention to the rights of the owner, and consideration should be given to setting up... some mechanism where the refusal by an owner can be tested in a fair and open manner», Report, p95.
SageGroup Associates v. Dominion Textile (USA)(244 A.D. 2d 281)-- the «able» prong of the ready, willing and able test refers to the prospective subtenant's financial ability; although broker established he procured a prospective subtenant ready, willing and able to sublet on terms set by the prospective sublessor, the parties» disagreement as to the terms of their oral agreement raised triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment in favor of either party; no cause of action exists in quantum meruit, unjust enrichment and account stated where there is an express contract governing the broker's right to a commission; broker lacks standing to claim tortious interference with contract against landlord for refusal to grant tenant permission to sublease because broker is neither a party to nor an intended beneficiary of the sublease rejected by the landlord.