Along with their other sins, value - added evaluations would mean collective punishment of some teachers merely for teaching in schools and classes where it is harder to meet dubious
test score growth targets.
Looking at California's Immediate Intervention Underperforming Schools Program, the author points out that only 83 of the 430 schools involved met their students»
test score growth targets for two consecutive years.
Teachers must fight, politically and legally, against evaluations where the administrators who set policies unilaterally determine whether it was the fault of those policies or the individual teacher for not meeting
test score growth targets.
Not exact matches
But the produce - or - else
testing culture that she fostered — tying portions of some evaluations to
growth in
scores and securing commitments from principals to hit numerical
targets — created a climate of fear, in the view of many school employees.
To get the
score, the number of students who pass the
test are counted, and then the number of students who met their expected
growth targets are counted.
Promisingly, researchers have found that it is possible to orient students toward positive learning mindsets through low - cost interventions, including online programs that teach students about
growth mindsets and purpose.29 According to Carol Dweck and her colleagues, ``... educational interventions and initiatives that
target these psychological factors can have transformative effects on students» experience and achievement in school, improving core academic outcomes such as GPA and
test scores months and even years later.»
In the school year before AYD was implemented, scaled
scores for those students had increased by only 1 point on the Measures of Adequate Progress (MAP)
test, and just 20 % met district
growth targets.
It earned a C from the state based on student
test scores in 2015, with an overall proficiency rate of 65 percent, and failed to meet state
targets for student
growth.
AYP measures the percentage of students making certain
target scores on standardized
tests in reading and math and graduation rates — regardless of students»
growth.
Studies published in the best economics and education journals have shown unequivocal evidence of excessive teaching to the
test and drilling that produces inflated measures of students»
growth in learning; cheating on
tests that includes erasing incorrect answers or filling in missing responses; shifting of students out of classrooms or other efforts to exclude anticipated poor performers from
testing, or alternatively, concentrating classroom teaching efforts on those students most likely to increase their
test scores above a particular
target, and other even more subtle strategies for increasing
testing averages.
* the raw
scores of each student * how many students fell into each of the achievement subgroups (
test scores broken down by 20 point percentile slices) * if each of the five percentile slices was generally above, below, or at its
growth target