This camel discovery could well be found to be inaccurate, those involved in the scientific endeavors will question and
test this hypothesis until it is proven or discarded.
But we really didn't have a way to
test that hypothesis until now.»
Not exact matches
He thought there might be another side, but he wouldn't believe it
until he
tested his
hypothesis.
* I put «answered» in quotation marks because science never completely answers the question but simply rules out more and more incorrect
hypotheses until it becomes clear that the answer most probably falls into a narrow range of possibilities in a well -
tested theory.
Until Mallon's study, neither of these
hypotheses had been rigorously
tested with such a large sample size.
Until recently, the only ways to
test that
hypothesis were to measure tau in brain tissue after a person died, or in a sample of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) extracted from a living person by needle.
But up
until now we couldn't fully
test this
hypothesis as we didn't know how fast fragmented objects rotate,» Drahus said.
This remains unknown, and
until we actually produce significant studies in humans to
test the
hypothesis, it remains an intriguing
hypothesis, but unfortunately, one without support.
That is why the classical
hypothesis test places the burden of proof so heavily on the alternative
hypothesis, and preserves the null
hypothesis until the evidence is overwhelmingly to the contrary.
One then collects as much good data as possible to
test that
hypothesis, certainly employing an expansive definition of school choice unless and
until you have an overwhelming number of cases.
To
test these
hypotheses, we combined long - term incubation studies (> 7 yrs) of permafrost samples with numerical modelling and simulated both oxic and anoxic GHG production from thawing permafrost
until 2100.
I thought I knew what «science» was about: the crafting of
hypotheses that could be
tested and refined through observation via studies that were challenged and replicated by the broader community
until the
hypothesis is generally accepted or rejected by the broader community.
The data we've gathered, showing that the sun rose on days N - 1, N - 2, N - 3, etc. might be grist to my Bayesian mill, but are useless for
testing the
hypothesis, since none of the data can falsify it — the
hypothesis remains untested
until day N dawns (or doesn't).
In a statistical
test, the null
hypothesis (H0) is considered valid
until enough data proves it to be wrong.
We can not expect to
test Svensmark's
hypothesis until somewhere around 2050 or so.
In conclusion, the thesis advocates that GCMs be used and developed uncompromisingly for «
Hypothesis testing, numerical experiments, to understand how the climate system works, including its sensitivity to altered forcing,» such a policy to continue
until climate model building becomes better understood.
The proposal is that we should regard CAGW as proven and accept it
until it is positively refuted, rather than as an
hypothesis which is on
test and not accepted
until established.
If it does, then we will perhaps be spared any accidental atmospheric
testing of the clathrate gun
hypothesis for the next 60 years or so,
until the AMO peaks again.
Take your statement further and reduce the numbers
until there is only one salesperson and you get a monopoly or better yet use the industry itself as a
test of your
hypothesis — fewer properties for sale mean higher prices.