Sentences with phrase «testimony of what»

I hate that I missed this up, because my Valentine's post is kind of a testimony of what I've learned about love.

While the testimony of what witnesses will say can be evidence of some things, the law will not allow apologies to be evidence of fault.

It's port to VR is a true testimony of what a triple A horror game when given the VR experience.

Their testimony of what happens to the losers led to an appeal to Jamaica for help, the erection of fortifications and a big argument as to whether to stay and fight or to run away.

Richmond Ayayi, the interdicted CID / Investigator who investigated into the case, finds himself in a very tight corner — as he continues to give contradictory testimony of what he told or tells the court and what the complainant in the case, Asamoah Gyan's manager, Samuel Anim Addo, told the court.

I bugged out, and to this day I have the testimony of what happened to me that day, to never be shaken in my faith.

This is doing violence and bearing false testimony of what the text actually says, and moreover betrays arrogance, for what we would be saying is, in fact, «we know better.

In that forty - year record, we find, as nowhere else, personal testimony of what the sexual revolution has done to womankind.

That's all according to multiple videos and passenger testimonies of what went down.

Not exact matches

The Dow, S&P 500 and Russell 2000 hit record highs this week as investors put the congressional testimony of former FBI Director James Comey and Attorney General Jeff Sessions on the back burner and await what could be the fourth rate hike in more than a decade on Wednesday.

Comey preempted his hearing by authorizing the release of his opening remarks for testimony on Wednesday, giving reporters and political observers time to comb through what the former FBI director plans to say about his private communications with President Donald Trump.

Comey was careful in his written testimony not to make any assertions about whether the president obstructed justice or attempted to obstruct justice in his conversations with the FBI director, outlining what he said the facts of those conversations were.

Sen. Richard Burr, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, subsequently turned the floor over to the attorney general, who went on to say that he had consulted with senior Justice Department staff prior to his testimony about what he called a «longstanding policy» regarding communications with the president.

«The dollar is what it is,» Poloz said during testimony at the House of Commons Finance Committee on April 28, 2015.

«While we're fretting about FBI raids on presidential lawyers or the latest chatter out of China or Mark Zuckerberg's senate testimony, let's not forget what the stock market is really about: it's about companies.

«Part of what they're observing is the jurors» reactions to each witness» testimony and then they regroup during breaks and at the end of the day.»

According to a transcript obtained by The Hollywood Reporter of testimony given as part of a lawsuit filed against CBS in 2016, the TV judge takes a no nonsense approach to getting what she wants.

But Russo, who took the stand today, also denied much of Jacobs's testimony and some of what the letter said.

In fact, in his testimony, Jacobs walked back some of what his attorney wrote in the letter.

Near the close of his written testimony, Zuckerberg writes: «I want to be clear about what our priority is: protecting our community is more important than maximizing our profits.»

As we've pointed out already, his written testimony is pretty selective and self - serving in terms of what he does and doesn't include in his version of events.

In both June and July, the Senate took testimony on what Wall Street has been doing with depositor money instead of making sound loans to sound businesses.

In his testimony before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee on November 28th, 2017, he stated, «We make better decisions when we have diverse voices around the table — both at the Board of Governors and at the Reserve Banks... We've seen what works.

Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, says that the company's lawyers plan to review all of the documents released by the F.B.I. to see what Hogan told the F.B.I. during the extortion investigation and whether that matches the testimony he's given in his state court case again Gawker.

It only clarifies that what the apostles had written and testified about Jesus as Son of God, as God, and as one who had died for the sins of mankind, who was raised to life and will return literally in this world in their writings ARE ALL FALSE TESTIMONIES about Jesus, which means the apostles had presented to us a false «Jesus», for Jesus still says in Rev. 22:16 that he will send an «angel» or messenger to testify about him (Jesus).

no matter what is said... we can not change history... no matter how many times we try to re-write it in our contemporary times... no matter how many times we try and soothe our consciences... that blood calls from the ground... and it will be vindicated in the end... then i saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of GOD and the testimony they had maintained..

But you hate what God does and object to His ways in culture, and to testimonies of His works.

I appreciate and welcome Ms. Cunis» and Mr. Schuler's testimonies that deepen some of what I hoped to suggest in my article.

You Said: «What if I were so angry that the Lord didn't help me, that I going on a violent rampage in the name of god, referencing this player in my testimony?»

Heresay — Evidence that is offered by a witness of which they do not have direct knowledge but, rather, their testimony is based on what others have said to them.

«1 Very truly I [Jesus] tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony.

As athies resort to bluster and utter nonsense, logic dictates what the bible confirms and the testimony of hundreds of millions throughout the ages.

What you have presented is that «Sentience and this universe and life in it are evidence of design and creation, hence Designer and Creator, let alone testimony throughout the ages of the Scriptures».

It is a testimony to the scientific integrity of the critical school that by applying its own methods more strictly it was led to discard many of the presuppositions upon which it formerly relied, and to arrive at what I believe to be a juster estimate of the material with which it deals.

«In the first place we must remember,» says Bromiley, «that the Bible is not to be abstracted from Christ and made the center of unity in its own right... Unity is grounded in Christ himself and... it is served by the Bible when the Bible is understood in clear relationship to Christ as the authoritative prophetic and apostolic testimony... We may go to the Bible with very different views of what it is and how it is to be understood or applied.

«What is more, the testimonies may awaken a glimmer of hope — «Maybe there's a chance I can do it too.»

It is when people fill their lives with some of the blessings of life — such as eating, drinking, and marrying — so that they ignore the signs of the times in which they live and the testimony from God about what is coming unless they all heeded the warnings and followed the ways of God (Matthew 24:32 - 33).

Can you think of a better visible testimony to a watching world of what God has done for us in Christ than caring for orphans in their need and helplessness?

But even more important than this testimony to what will inevitably prove to be a temporary intensity of joy is the institutional structure that seems to be emerging.

The most interesting part of this testimony tells us that Satan & his demons are planning to bring down the preachers, ministry and the church... Sounds exactly what is happening right now.

The right to believe what one will and to bear public testimony to that belief cuts to the heart of the American experiment in a free and just public order.

Nevertheless, what an extraordinary testimony to the world about the importance of praying to the one true God and to the wonderful and mysterious way he responds in reassurance and love to those prayers.

We speak of «the doctrine of the atonement,» «the doctrine of Christ,» or «the doctrine of God,» and what we have in mind is the collective testimony from the various biblical authors as to what should be believed about the atonement, about Christ, and about God.

God has given us much evidence of His existence: how about the intricacies of how the human body works - can you really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty of nature - can we really think that that just happened; what about the testimony of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that point to things beyond their comprehension or doing.

WHAT kind os testimony is it to preach eternal life of seeing a man half dead???? verysilly is your argument...

What kind of a testimony to Christ would it be to tell them that?

If it is true that Christ Jesus is what / who he claimed to be (and I i'm sure of it beyond the shadow of doubt), then that makes the ones who acknowledge Him and believe His testimony followers of true light.

Today, Christians of integrity are thrown back upon the never reducible testimony of Scripture, Tradition and the divine Spirit — a testimony that defies possession, but also manifests an exceptional trust in the insight, imagination, reasonableness and spiritual courage of ordinary human beings when they are modest enough to ask for what they do not and can not possess.

What this is a awesome testimony of the strength of your community.

While it has always been evident to me that there is [a] God, by the testimony of this wondrous universe and life in it, I never believed in [a] Personal God before going through what I described.