He has given
testimony on climate impacts in the United States Senate and his work on biodiversity impacts has been published in journals, including Climate Research, Climatic Change, and Conservation Biology in Practice.
Not exact matches
«White House officials and political appointees in the agencies censored congressional
testimony on the causes and
impacts of global warming, controlled media access to government
climate scientists, and edited federal scientific reports to inject unwarranted uncertainty into discussions of
climate change.»
The White House is sitting
on EPA's proposed public welfare «endangerment» finding
on greenhouse emissions, the Interior Secretary sits
on a science - based listing of the polar bear as threatened with extinction, the White House censors
testimony by the CDC director
on health effects, the Transportation Dept. tries to bury a major study
on climate change
impacts on Gulf Coast transportation infrastructure, and so forth.
The draft
testimony begins by stating that «In the United States,
climate change is likely to have a significant
impact on health, through links with the following outcomes,» and then lists nine main areas of
climate change
impacts on health.
Oral Summary Statement of Congressional
Testimony of Dr. John T. Everett
on Climate Change
Impact on Oceans, Coastal Zones, Polar Regions and the resources they contain
US Congressional
Testimony of Dr. John T. Everett
on Climate Change
Impact on Oceans, Coastal Zones, Polar Regions and the resources they contain
The hearing, «Data or Dogma: Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate over the Magnitude of Human
Impact on Earth's
Climate,» featured testimony from three scientists who are skeptical of the case for action to address climate change (Prof. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, Prof. John Christy of the University of Alabama Huntsville and Prof. Will Happer of Princeton University), one mainstream climate scientist (Prof. David Titley of Penn State University), and talk radio personality and author Mark
Climate,» featured
testimony from three scientists who are skeptical of the case for action to address
climate change (Prof. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, Prof. John Christy of the University of Alabama Huntsville and Prof. Will Happer of Princeton University), one mainstream climate scientist (Prof. David Titley of Penn State University), and talk radio personality and author Mark
climate change (Prof. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, Prof. John Christy of the University of Alabama Huntsville and Prof. Will Happer of Princeton University), one mainstream
climate scientist (Prof. David Titley of Penn State University), and talk radio personality and author Mark
climate scientist (Prof. David Titley of Penn State University), and talk radio personality and author Mark Steyn.
For our host's position
on uncertainties related to a) natural factors and CO2 /
climate impact, b) the lack of evidence that AGW will become an existential threat in this century and c) the need to clear up as many uncertainties as possible before starting the implementation of actions whose unintended negative consequences we can not judge today, read her
testimony to the Baird committee of US Congress last fall.
White House officials and political appointees in the agencies censored congressional
testimony on the causes and
impacts of global warming, controlled media access to government
climate scientists, and edited federal scientific reports to inject unwarranted uncertainty into discussions of
climate change and to minimize the threat to the environment and the economy.
Lastly, I would like to draw the Committee's attention to the
testimony of Dr. Steven Murawski, of NMFS, at a hearing
on Projected and Past Effects of
Climate Change: a Focus
on Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems before the Senate Committee
on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Subcommittee
on Global
Climate Change and
Impacts,
on April 26, 2006.