During the past 20 years, there has been a steady increase in the use of standardized
tests as accountability measures (Linn, 2000; Madaus & Tan, 1993).
Not exact matches
That is especially true, she notes, when rewards and punishments are attached to the outcomes of the
tests,
as is the case under the No Child Left Behind law and states» own «
accountability»
measures.
The Sunshine State had instituted school voucher programs, increased the number of charter schools, and devised a sophisticated
accountability system that evaluates schools on the basis of their progress
as measured by the Florida Comprehensive Assessment
Test (FCAT).
In good
measure, the failures of the current system have festered
as long
as they have because many of the advocates of
test - based
accountability simply didn't want to face the evidence.
Longtime Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley had won control over the school system in 1995 and generally received accolades for rising scores on state
tests; hard - charging superintendents, including Paul Vallas and Arne Duncan; tough
accountability measures such
as reduced social promotion; and a slew of new schools and shiny buildings.
As we continue to study choice - based policies in K — 12 education, one challenge we must confront is the push - pull created by high - stakes
accountability measures designed to assess schools, students, and educators, based solely on
test scores — an area where choice proponents and opponents often find common ground.
Achieve, which normally assesses
accountability systems at the state level for «quality and coherence,» praised the Montgomery County assessments
as rigorous, high - quality
measures that are good predictors of students» performance on state - level
tests.
Within a state's
accountability plan, «substantial weight» would have to be given to quantitative
measures, such
as graduation rates and performance on state
tests, with much less weight allotted to subjective
measures, such
as school climate and educator engagement.
In standards - based reform, much of the attention has been on states
as the entities responsible for setting academic standards, developing
testing systems to
measure the standards, and then putting
accountability systems in place based on those standards.
If they do, they'll face initial opposition from President Obama, who has defended annual
testing as an essential
accountability measure.
Almost every state is now instituting
accountability systems to
measure progress in standards - based reform, and almost every such system depends heavily on
testing as an indicator of student or school performance.
Michael Soskil: We need a shift in focus from
accountability measures based on standardized
test scores toward metrics that take into account universal access to quality teachers and learning environments, robust curricula that include the arts,
as well
as student engagement and well - being.
However, the problem with NCLB
as it is currently enacted is not the
accountability requirements but the
measure used to assess
accountability, high - stakes
testing.
As districts — as well as states — now have the opportunity under ESSA to design accountability systems that consider measures beyond state standardized test scores, system leaders must understand the need for coherenc
As districts —
as well as states — now have the opportunity under ESSA to design accountability systems that consider measures beyond state standardized test scores, system leaders must understand the need for coherenc
as well
as states — now have the opportunity under ESSA to design accountability systems that consider measures beyond state standardized test scores, system leaders must understand the need for coherenc
as states — now have the opportunity under ESSA to design
accountability systems that consider
measures beyond state standardized
test scores, system leaders must understand the need for coherence.
Assessment information used in
accountability must focus on those areas deemed most important, not only those areas that are easiest to
measure with inexpensive tools, such
as standardized
tests, though such tools have a place in the
accountability process.
The
test score issue comes
as California's school
accountability system is undergoing a broad revision,
as the Brown administration and state schools chief Tom Torlakson search for more achievement
measures than just
test scores.
Over the several decades that standardized
test results have been used
as an
accountability measure, few have questioned the assumption that these
tests provide evidence that actually reflects school quality and that can promote school improvement.
KNOWLEDGE BRIEF 15 by Stephen Raudenbush Student scores on standardized
tests are used
as measures for teacher
accountability, but, arguably, helping children score well on an achievement
test is of little value in itself.
For example, while we have ample evidence of unintended consequences of
test - based
accountability —
as well
as evidence of some potential benefits — we know less about the consequences of using value - added
measures to encourage educators to improve.
But with the joint imprimatur of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, advocates of standardized
testing, school choice, merit pay, and tough
accountability measures like school closings heralded these
measures as «reforms.»
Yet, even
as the United States begins implementing SEL across its educational system and shifting from high - stakes, strictly
test - based
accountability, SEL experts debate whether we can accurately
measure and assess these skills and competencies — and if so, whether we should use those results to gauge school quality.
Yet, even
as the United States begins implementing SEL across its educational system and shifting from high - stakes, strictly
test - based
accountability, SEL experts debate whether we can accurately
measure and assess these competencies.
Members of the Public Schools
Accountability Act Advisory Committee said one key issue that still remains to be worked out is the weighted emphasis graduation rates will be given within the overall API calculation
as the state moves to reduce the import of
test results and factor in other
measures indicative of student success.
I'm also not clear
as to why teacher
accountability (through evaluation of student learning by
test scores and other, richer
measures) runs counter to teaching students the value of self - discipline and motivation.
We find that the estimated gaps are strongly associated with the proportions of the
test scores based on multiple - choice and constructed - response questions on state
accountability tests, even when controlling for gender achievement gaps
as measured by the NAEP or NWEA MAP assessments, which have the same item format across states.
Alaska is working local interim
tests into its
accountability system
as a
measure of school quality or student success for elementary schools.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Evers said the state could employ the «value - added» method developed at UW - Madison to
measure student growth on a new state
test as part of a new state
accountability system for schools.
The
tests would not be used
as a school
accountability measure.
I'm also quite sure of how difficult a task it is to push the standards rock up the status quo hill, particularly in a day and age when we are wary of
testing in general and many are waiting to see what will become of the
accountability standards in NCLB
as wishes move to reauthorization, multiple
measures, and a new look on federal education policy.
Benjamin Franklin High School in New Orleans holds the title
as the top school in Louisiana based on standardized
test scores and other
measures included on the state's
accountability report card and is listed among the nation's best public schools.
Considering all this, some experts have gone so far
as to say that regardless of what ends up happening in the judicial system, the political momentum for using
test - based
accountability measures is all but over.
In years past, K - 12
accountability measures focused on data points such
as third - grade reading scores, the number of ninth - graders taking algebra, or setting new records for the most number of AP
tests taken and passed.
Many principals mentioned they use value - added
measures to place teachers in
tested subjects and with students in grade levels that «count» for
accountability purpose... some principals [also used] VAM [output] to move ineffective teachers to untested grades, such
as K - 2 in elementary schools and 12th grade in high schools» (p. 100).
Policies that use standardized
test scores
as the most important
accountability measure for schools, teachers or students, and / or expand the use of standardized
testing in our schools.
If assessments are going to be used
as accountability measures, reliability (the degree to which a
test can be depended on to produce consistent results repeatedly), and validity (the extent to which a
test accurately
measures the result that it is intended to
measure), become critically important.
He describes the nation's main education law
as an «impediment to reform,» citing ESEA's outdated
testing regimen,
accountability measures, and teacher quality determinations, all of which fail to align with the widely adopted Common Core State Standards
as well
as recent state efforts to overhaul their teacher evaluation systems.
Even
as educators are integrating these more rigorous standards into their instruction, student and school performance continue to be judged using No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) outdated
testing regimen and
accountability measures.
After taking a step forward by incorporating student outcomes into the
accountability index for students with disabilities, the Office of Special Education Programs promptly took a gigantic leap backward by relying solely on standardized
testing as the only
measure of program performance.
«Multimetric
accountability systems should use formative assessments, evidence of student learning, and progress toward personal growth objectives to
measure student and teacher success rather than rely on standardized
test scores
as the primary reference point.»
The Obama administration's 2011 waivers from particular NCLB provisions, known
as ESEA flexibility, marked the beginning of a departure from this limited focus.6 By 2015, the U.S. Department of Education had approved 42 states and the District of Columbia for ESEA flexibility, giving them the opportunity to expand
accountability measures beyond
test scores and graduation rates.
The Winston Society — or «Winsoc,» in Orwell's newspeak — played on these associations in constructing the wiki
as a space for classroom teachers to join the likes of Winston Smith and «fight big brother» — that is, work against NCLB and its
test - based
accountability measures — and cultivate alternative visions for education that involved more progressive politics and pedagogies.
The board covers fairly familiar ground while acknowledging that some aspects of NCLB have been negative, such
as the inability of
test based
accountability to distinguish between so - called «failing» schools and schools that missed certain
accountability targets
as measured by
tests.
We hope the national spotlight on Chicago's schools refocuses the nation's attention on building connections between schools, parents and communities, backing research - based reforms and beginning the important pushback on damaging practices such
as high - stakes
testing, school closings, and flawed teacher
accountability measures.
The new bill gives control back to state and local governments by allowing them to create their own school
accountability and teacher evaluation systems so
as to provide greater flexibility in deciding how much weight
test scores hold
as a means of performance
measures and teacher qualification.
However, it will come
as no surprise that despite growing nationwide resistance, the federal government has reaffirmed its commitment to annual high - stakes standardized
testing and
accountability measures, and to linking those scores to school funding.
Joseph Martineau joined the Center
as a Senior Associate in January 2014, and has led and contributed to work on growth models, prepared for and analyzed the effects of interruptions of online
testing, developed and improved
testing and
accountability systems,
measured achievement gaps, conducted standard setting, evaluated
test security, designed comprehensive assessment systems, conceptualized high school assessment under ESSA, designed educator certification
testing, and implemented educator evaluation systems.
For those states that have opted to administer the
test to all learners
as an
accountability measure, a
testing schedule may be found on your state education agency's site.
The act's emphasis on
test scores
as the primary
measure of school performance has narrowed the curriculum, and the one - size - fits - all
accountability system has mislabeled schools
as failures even if their students are demonstrating real academic growth.
NAESP is pleased to have played a role in creating the opportunities that are now afforded to schools under the new law, such
as allowing
accountability systems to include multiple
measures, factoring in elements other than
test scores; conducting needs assessments for struggling schools and learning communities facing the greatest challenges; developing clear and concise plans for targeting federal funding in ways that meet the needs of students in the school; and implementing local programs and monitoring their progress in collaboration with educators.
Accordingly, the following question would be inappropriate to ask judges
as they review the relationship between content standards and the items on an
accountability test: Is this
test item in agreement with the curricular aim it is intended to
measure?