In 23 trends measured, Edison students were making smaller gains on criterion - referenced
tests than comparison groups.
Not exact matches
The study by ctb / McGraw - Hill found that, in 1987, students in grades 1 to 8 who took its Comprehensive
Test of Basic Skills scored an average of 6.63 percentile points higher in reading, 10.83 points higher in language, and 14 points higher in mathematics
than a 1981
comparison group.
• Value - added results, which have recently been touted as a better way to use standardized
test scores, are actually no more accurate
than year - to - year
comparisons of different
groups of students.
Few differences existed across
groups in 9th grade, but by the end of 10th grade, students»
test scores, academic grade point averages, and progress to graduation tended to be better for the students in programs of study (i.e., treatment students)
than for control /
comparison students.
Most Americans can correctly identify carbon dioxide as a gas created by the burning of fossil fuels (68 %), and a similar share, 65 %, recognize that a
comparison or control
group is a better method for
testing the effectiveness of a new drug
than simply giving the drug to a single
group.
MIT using bibliotherapy was chosen as a
comparison group because: (a) it seemed inappropriate to withhold treatment by assigning children to wait - list
groups when the efficacy of moderately intensive parent training is well - established; (b)
comparisons to alternative treatments provide stronger
tests of treatment efficacy
than do
comparisons to untreated controls; and (c) WLC cause problems in assessing outcomes because WLCs generate a disproportionate number of dropouts that are difficult to address in «completer» analyses (Werba et al., 2006).