However, on the opposite side of the fence, with so much spoken dialogue in the game,
the text less thoughts of each character in their story mode are downright boring.
Not exact matches
You just have to take the time to
think about it long enough to see that these ancient written
texts were written by humans with
less knowledge about science than we have now.
So you pull an extremely out of context passage, from the OT no
less, and proof
text it on us and somehow
think it makes your point.
Other kids are much
less likely to send middle of the night
text messages if they
think parents might intercept them.
There's also
less pressure to be witty or quick on your feet when you have time to
think before you
text.
But a
text take
less then 30 seconds of my day to say thanx for the roses, or when i woke up i couldn't stop
thinking about you, or even my saddest message after we depart.....
All About Eve Year: 1950 Directed by: Joseph L. Mankiewicz Starring: Bette Davis, Anne Baxter, George Sanders, Celeste Holm, Thelma Ritter, Marilyn Monroe Why it's essential: This movie used to get brushed off as essential for gay audiences, and while it does pretty much function as the Gay Bible — in that there's a lot of fascinating history and memorable one - liners, but too few people are actually familiar with the
text — we've long passed the point where it's acceptable to
think of All About Eve as anything
less than a cinematic classic.
For example,
less than half (47 percent) of Louisiana teachers
thought that «selecting
texts for individual students based on their reading levels» was an instructional approach aligned with standards (it's not) compared to 70 percent of teachers in other states.
I wish I could remember other specific books, but part of me
thinks the specific books matter
less than the fact that reading the same
texts — whatever they are — gives people a way to open up and enter discussions that otherwise might be off - limits.
If it's necessary to point out the flaws, it would have been nice if there was
less profanity in the
text, only because the current dialog will prevent forward -
thinking English teachers from using this book with their students as they teach Shakespeare's work.
It's post-Thanksgiving in the US and I'm sure everyone's still feeling too sick to move, so I
thought I'd spend this weekend with
less text for you to read and more pictures for you to look at.
Mainly based off a fairly infamous video made about the game, but hopefully the
text version of the article is a bit
less biased and explains the
thoughts from the video more clearly.
But however amazing you
think your words are, the bitter truth is that the more
text there is, the
less likely anyone will start reading it at all.
As the art world has continued its ceaseless migrations around and through the city, I find myself in SoHo
less and
less, but every time I pass the high windows on Spring Street with the simple
text announcing the Judd Foundation, I
think about knocking on the window, and smile.
JF We discussed Samuel Beckett earlier; I am
thinking about your paintings in relation to Beckett's method (in the bulk of his mature work) of writing in French and translating his
text into English afterward, so that his language was
less precious or artistic, more directly functional.
Lawrence Theall, a Toronto lawyer and co-author of a legal
text on product liability in Canada, says he
thinks that proposed class actions, such as the Vitaminwater case, are
less likely to succeed in our courts.
Fast - fingered whippersnappers can likely outperform Siri's speed because of the «
think» time from command to execution, but we envision Siri opening the world of smartphones to
less tech - savvy users who can't already jam
text in at lightning speed.
First, its use of the term «radical» (for which the Critique offers no citation): The relevant discussion in the article refers to two explicitly «experimental» proposals included at the end of the article, in a section titled «
Thinking Outside of the Box...» The introduction to that part of the discussion states «I call this a «
thought experiment» because I am well aware that the practical realities of child protection practice may mean that it would not work...» Later the
text notes that one proposal is «
less radical» than the other.
What are some of the reasons you
think things have changed recently and we've started to talk and
text less often?