Sentences with phrase «text read out»

Sadly, the Authors Guild and publishers have successfully insisted that the right to have a text read out loud is a separate feature that doesn't come routinely when you license an ebook, thus limiting the extent to which one key adaptive technology can be employed.

Drivers are alerted to an incoming text and, after initiating the system, can hear the text read out loud and respond via voice recognition, or via the steering wheel switches using pre-set answers such as «driving, can't text,» «on my way,» «running late,» «okay» or a custom message.

Not exact matches

(Judging from the Kickstarter page, this app is a tad aggressive: «Good morning Chris, your body clock is now out of sync by 56 minutes,» a sample text reads.

There are many reasons to try it out, from it's relative low starting cost, to the fact that the vast majority of texts are actually opened and read to some extent.

I got a kick out of reading my texts via the HUD, even if there's no way to return messages without actually pulling out your phone.

Subscribers would then either read text on their computer screens or download it and print it out.

ha read the Quran sometime they wont change read these texts and see for your self Seek out your enemies relentlessly.»

The «Do not judge» phrase taken out of the context (Americans don't read texts anyway) destroyed America.

Three hundred Bibles in Arabic and Amharic have been handed out in the Calais camp so that refugees and migrants can read the text in their own language.

It turns out that all those texts are still out there to be read, and that many of them I did not need anyway.

The biblical hermeneutic of Christian Zionism distorts biblical texts by reading them out of their canonical and historical context, making them seem more like such fictional works as the «Left Behind» series than the whole Word of God.

Books like Holy Hilarity help us break out of the box of reading the Bible with straight faces, so that we can see the truth in the text.

In the book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the text with the prejudice of love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and, as many reviewers have pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.

The Consultation recognized that reading from other scriptures during Christian worship may well be beneficial, provided it is not done to criticise those to whom the text belongs nor misused out of context to support Christian claims.

Dear Jeremy, I read this article and please go with me as I lay out the logic, or the lack of logic in this text.

«This position could not simply be read out of any one biblical text,» Noll says.

This is what a comprehensive contextual reading of Scripture leads to, instead of having to balance apparently contradictory texts against each other when they are plucked out as «proof texts.»

Read the Nag Hammadi texts and study Gnosticism... the Bible is nothing more than a short story compilation... other meaningful «stories» were left out.

I put this question out to some of my Rabbis Without Borders colleagues, and in addition to seconding the Bereshit Rabbah idea, they recommended Searching for Meaning in Midrash: Lessons for Everyday Living by Michael Katz and Gershon Schwartz and Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text by Rabbi Burt Visotzky.

We experience God and revelation as perennially - unfolding, which means there's always room for new ways of understanding divinity and sacred text, especially when the old ways of understanding them (e.g. antiquated readings of Leviticus 18:22) turn out to be hurtful or to seem misguided.

When I, as a Baptist, or my sister, as a Catholic, reads the verse «this is my body,» a flood of opinions pour out as to the meaning of that text.

5A reading of Bacon's New Organon reveals a more nuanced and less empiricist approach to induction than Whitehead (and other twentieth - century philosophers) usually give him credit, One text in particular refers to the ascent and descent characteristic of imaginative generalizations:»... from the new light of axioms, which have been educed from those particulars by a certain method and rule, shall in their turn point out the way again to new particulars, greater things shall be looked for.

Several of us entered into a heated discussion with our visitor, out of which a relative consensus emerged: We do read the classic texts of Latin American theology (Gutiérrez, Boff, Segundo, Sobrino, Miguez Bonino and others), some of them for their historical importance, others for their continuing relevance.

Interestingly enough I recall reading an analysis of this text which pointed out that in the earliest versions of it the «go and sin no more» statement was not present.

(4) Biblical texts must be understood in their human context: for otherwise we shall fail to read their real point out of them and instead read into them points they are not making at all.

The problem with theology is that people read back into the text the ideas that they have established out of the text.

I enjoy reading all kinds of ancient texts... as you find out when doing this, reading about other religions and their texts of faith... you find that there are alot of common denominators..

When, during the course of his reading what he came to say, applause and cheers broke out, he would hesitantly look up from his text with a small smile of pleased surprise and say, in effect, «That's very nice but now let us return to the subject at hand.»

But we are faced just like the literary critic with figuring out what the text says, of constructing a reading of it.

We read the Bible «through the Jesus lens» — which looks suspiciously like it means using the parts of the Gospels that we like, with the awkward bits carefully screened out, which enables us to disagree with the biblical texts on God, history, ethics and so on, even when Jesus didn't (Luke 17:27 - 32 is an interesting example).

That way you get to read a lot of extra text that the Protestants left out.

mindful that the Bible is read out in church, the text is usually translated less explicitly)...

At least... and here's the key... you must not ever read them or use them or open them until AFTER you have finished studying the text and writing out your sermon or Bible study.

Regrettably, she does little more than provide us with a reminder of a textbook example of eisegesis (reading «into» the biblical text one's own ideology) rather than exegesis (reading «out of» Scripture with attentiveness to historical and literary context, even if it conflicts with one's own personal views).

During and immediately after your first reading of a text you should write out or record your questions.

You will sense that particular gestures are appropriate, that certain words and phrases stand out in your practice readings, and that various meanings of the texts will be coming into sharper focus.

It is our desire to apply which led us to read — unless, that is, we are out of relationship with our own existence and seek only to quarry the text for publishable tidbits (but that too is an «application» of sorts).

J.I. Packer probably is a good representation of the historic view: «Reference to a second blessing has to be read into the [biblical] text; it can not be read out of it.»

(Again, this is a reading that I favor, but it is not one spelled out explicitly in the text.)

The so - called scriptural basis for saying gay people aren't ok is mostly based on a very few readings taken out - of context with added interpretations that aren't in the text at all.

A refusal to make use of these tools to ascertain the proper text reading, its relation to other literature, and the cultural - historical milieu out of which it arose, is a move toward dishonesty prompted either by a fear of what might be discovered or by an impatience to get a sermon that can not tarry at books that are not heavy with homiletical fruit.

Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some of the problematic consequences of Enlightenment assumptions regarding the biblical text: false claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must make sense with an overall view of God and the wider world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings of scripture that cast Christianity as out - of - date and irrelevant, a human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing of the problem of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction of the act of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..

The verses themselves are not explicitly printed out, but rather text on the soft drink cup reads «John 3:16» which indicates the bible passage, «For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.»

There are many commentaries out there that were written after Ezra's reading of the Torah to the returning Exiles that have fought with the texts, trying to determine the meaning of the words, the glorification of violence and the various laws.

There are already plenty of ancient texts out there read by early christians that contradict modern Christian dogma

That Israel, therefore, went out «equipped for battle» (vs. 18) seems quite impossible; and it may be that we ought to read the text here, as suggested by many interpreters with good reason, «by fifties» or «in five divisions» (referring to the organization of the march).

When people expect to get history, science, doctrine, and ethics out of the Bible, but end up with nothing of the sort, or what they do get does not agree with science, history, or the doctrine of others, they either reject the whole thing as fiction, or they blindly believe and obey what they read, because they don't know what else to do with the text.

If you'll read some of the text in the book I explain that you'll have to figure out what temp it is next to the meat regardless of where the temp gauge is on your cooker.

If the warm apple and cinnamon fragrance from our kitchen could spread into my laptop, on to the internet and out through whatever device you are reading this on, then I could stop writing this text right here.

If u really really REALLY want to read his endless drivel you can always Click on the show text button and find out why u were better of before.