Sentences with phrase «than i should admit»

(The tuna variation is surprisingly delicious, and I probably eat it more often than I should admit!)

I own many culottes, full midi skirts & have loved faux fur for longer than I should admit.

I wear these denim way more than I should admit.

I'm way more excited about the fridge than I should admit, but I guess that is what happens with home ownership.

Watching Little House on the Prairie while growing up (more times than one should admit to in a blog) led me to be fascinated with people who could make things themselves at home, instead of running to the store.

Not exact matches

You should quickly admit you don't know rather than try to bluff.

I recently spent more time than I should probably admit to enjoying a collection of top video ads curated by readers over on the Moz blog.

# 6: Employee Development In OldCo, Joe admits that he kept several employees longer than he should have.

I will be the first to admit, as you should, that I do not know all of the answers, but I think the journey of trying to discover them is far more fascinating than saying «well god did it, so thats it».

If you admit the value of the scientific method, if you value the process of questioning assumptions, and requiring evidence to support assertions, rather than the idea of holding assertions because they are plesant, then your beliefs should be tossed out.

then by your own admitted standards, Evangelicals pretty much have no one they should support: Republicans, especially RELIGIOUS Republicans, are quite possibly, more than any other group of people in this country, the most hypocritical people on the planet.

It's far easier than admitting the truth — that a book touted as a «moral guide» should not condone slavery in the first place.

Rather than admit that we do not have the answer to that question, we should all believe that your god snapped his fingers and life magically appeared!

We should also admit in all honesty that in the general practice of the Church these distinctions are suppressed rather than clarified as far as the faithful are concerned.

1 Timothy 3:5 means: «Of one wife»... The meaning is not that every bishop should have a wife (for St. Paul himself had none), but that no one should be admitted to the holy orders of bishop, priest, or deacon, who had been married more than once.

Despite the fact that even today many in the Confessional Church will not see and admit it, there could have been no other outcome than that this truth of the freedom of the church, despite the claims of National Socialism, should come to signify not only a «religious» decision, not only a decision of church policy, but also and ipso facto a political decision.

You would need to admit that if your argument is valid and that in order to reject belief in something, we would need to be omniscient, than you'd have to admit that they should also believe in Thor because to NOT believe would mean that YOU are omniscient and see that Thor is not in that set of knowledge you possess.

The kind of action from social awareness that is demanded by perfect love is such as must admit the tragic reality that there are people who are genuinely intent upon using their freedom to destroy the freedom of others, and that, under certain circumstances, love itself may dictate that «It is better that many should die prematurely than that nearly all men should live in a permanent state of hostility or slavery» (MVG 173).

It is to admit that there is good we might in our freedom accomplish which we should not attempt, because what we do counts for even more than what we accomplish.

More often than we're comfortable admitting, I think, we find ourselves feeling what many recent theologians say we should: a twinge of uneasiness at speaking of heaven outside of church; the sense that Jesus» death and resurrection can't quite be brought to bear on our daily routine, our social life, our moneymaking, our recreation; an inability to see with the heart the goodness of the Good News; a certain emptiness in our prayers.

More often than we're comfortable admitting, I think, we find ourselves feeling what many recent theologians say we should: a twinge of uneasiness at speaking of heaven outside of church; the sense that Jesus» death and resurrection can't quite be brought to bear on our daily routine, our social life, our moneymaking, our recreation; an...

The fact that MacIntyre's defense of virtue ethics is extreme, however, should not prevent us from admitting that he points out some severe defects in Kantian ethics, defects which, I think, Hartshorne can handle better than MacIntyre.

I admit he's surely better than Pawlenty — who called Mitch is an «intellectual heavyweight» yesterday (in comparison, he should have added, to himself).

Thank you brother for your comforting words and I should admit I was not taking a good care of my health lately nor was really enjoying my life, living in a boring routine that which God had wanted me to change by putting me through such experience to compel me to make some changes to my routine life which I appreciate so much to be given a second chance... So Eid Mubarak brother although being late but better than never...!

I've spent far more time than I care to admit combing through complementarian literature, reading debates about whether women can read Scripture aloud in church, whether female missionaries should be permitted to give presentations on Sunday evenings, what age groups women should be allowed to teach in Sunday school, whether women can speak in small group Bible studies, what titles to bestow upon worship leaders and children's ministry coordinators so that they don't appear too authoritative, and on and on and on.

I'm not sure everyone here would be willing to admit that, following Paul, we should talk about what's beneficial rather than permissible.

After all, I have admitted that a free - will theodicy will be inherently more «defensive» than the process theodicy — that a free - will theodicy will be at points less able than the process theodicy to offer explanations for evil that flow in a natural, intuitive sense from the theistic tenets on which it is built — and isn't it reasonable to assume that the theodicy which is least defensive in this sense should be considered most plausible?

Rather than sometimes stretch the definition of intention to breaking point, it might be better simply to admit that intention should not be «made to do all the work» when identifying what is absolutely morally excluded.

The thought of taking a relatively cheap cut of meat, with a reputation for being dry and dull, and elevating it to something worthy of serving to company makes me a little more excited than I should really admit here.

As a rule (and I'll admit it is my rule), to ensure the finest crumb and texture, vegan cake batter should not fill the baking pan more than a scant half full.

Halloween is just around the corner and the kid in me is more excited than I should probably admit.

Our defender did at least admit that the team was hugely disappointed to have missed the chances on offer throughout the season so far, but the rest of his comments sounded like just more empty platitudes to me, the sort of thing he thinks he should be saying rather than the truth, that the Gunners are in a bad way and are starting to really worry about losing our place in the top four.

However, the youngster's representative — Zoran Stojadinovic — has admitted that should Barcelona entertain loan offers for the starlet, he'd rather stay in Spain than move to England.

As for the academics thing, that's the kind of information that should be ingrained in the athletic department rather than just one football coach, because I doubt football is the only sport that may need to figure out how to get premiere athletes admitted to the school.

It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Bellerin has even publicly admitted he hasn't got a winning mentality to be a top level sports person, and that should ring enough alarm bells more than anything.

So instead of criticising Rose for admitting she was shook up by an event which actually could have escalated to become worse than it was, I think she should be commended for being honest about how she felt.

Our ridiculous manager should realise Monreal although doing a fair job is not Sagna, who is good in the air and quick on the ground, so this experiment must stop > Monreal has basically admitted that he is uncomfortable in that position, so why force this position on a player who has stated he is uncomfortable there, when we have a healthy chambers who has already have several games in that position and looks even more comfortable than at right back.

I admit Walcott is not the best player in the world but you guys should give him a break, he is very much better than Welbeck....

I have to admit to watching the highlights on channel 5 a little later, the Mr's was in the bath, I watched the 2nd half over and over again, I have been starved of such luxuries for too long, I even started to get a bit emotional... and I realised that I really do love this club more than I should do but god how I love loving it.

But, I have to admit that there have been a couple recently that have phased me more than they should.

I must admit I'm notorious for leaving disposables on a little longer than they should, but I'm oh so grateful for changing cloth diapers and keeping baby girl rash free.

We need to admit that the forces are greater than any one rule or philosophy so we don't carry all the responsibility on our shoulders.

If asked to comment on specific names, they may carefully modulate their approval, expressing more approval for some names than for others, but they should never admit to hating a particular name.

Levy admitted that interventions do, in themselves, have substantial costs and that one shouldn't «introduce a medicine that was worse than the disease» but gave no metric as to how this calculation was to be enacted.

Ministers have admitted that fewer than 30 % of schools constructed under their flagship school building programme had sprinkler systems installed, despite the presumption that all new school buildings should have sprinkler systems.

We are more than confident that the good work that has been done, should not be truncated with the change of the current leadership of the country,» he admitted.

Although, as I've said before, he and his colleagues shouldn't allow that confidence to spill over into callous rhetoric — there's more to Iain Duncan Smith's reforms than lazy lines about «scroungers» and «shirkers» admit.

However, Campbell shouldn't have to worry too much about this as he admits that he is far more likely to run for London mayor than as the Conservative candidate for Kensington.