Now, I am not a reader of magazines other
than Scientific American type publications, and have no curiosity for these things.
Here's a recent missive from no less
than Scientific American (Oct 16 2006 edition).
(That said, no less an authority
than Scientific American is concerned that Trump will be anti-science.)
Not exact matches
With just 300 qubits at its disposal, a quantum computer could run more calculations in an instant
than there are atoms in the universe, estimates
Scientific American.
Daytner is one of the exceedingly high - functioning people that USA Today and
Scientific American contributor Laura Vanderkam introduces in her new book 168 Hours: You Have More Time
Than You Think (Portfolio).
The
American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general
scientific society with more
than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution.
I would bet that the gay neighbor in the 1999 film
American Beauty, who, it is implied, loves guns, collects Nazi trinkets, and turns to murder all because he represses his own urges, formed more people's views about how to regard homosexuals
than did the entire decade's research into psychosexuality by the whole
scientific community.
What hurts more
than anything in the position they take is that it influences
scientific education, putting the
american students further behind its european counterpart: Creationism is NOT a science, it's a fantasy
I made the sweetened condense milk version in canning jars in a crock pot rather
than boiling cans — which is not good for you (this
Scientific American article will tell you why: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talk-can-dont/).
includes more
than 20 Chicago - area museums, from the
scientific (Adler Planetarium) to the cultural (Swedish
American Museum, National Hellenic Museum), from the artistic (Smart Museum) to the historical (DuSable Museum of African
American History, Chicago History Museum).
All the existing
scientific evidence, as well as state and national statistics shows that
American homebirth has an increased risk of death of at least 3 - 9 times higher
than comparable risk hospital birth.
Babies get all of the water they need from properly mixed formula or breast milk, and giving your little one more
than that can lead to water intoxication, according to a 2008 article published in «
Scientific American.»
Here is what you wrote — «Despite the fact that a Fall 2012 Cochrane Library Review (considered the gold standard of independent inquiry and
scientific objectivity) reports that home birth is as safe or in many cases actually safer
than hospital birth, the
American obstetrical community continues to publicly oppose homebirth, citing safety concerns as their main argument.»
Despite the fact that a Fall 2012 Cochrane Library Review (considered the gold standard of independent inquiry and
scientific objectivity) reports that home birth is as safe or in many cases actually safer
than hospital birth, the
American obstetrical community continues to publicly oppose homebirth, citing safety concerns as their main argument.
Renowned Writers More
than 150 Nobel laureates have written for
Scientific American, most of whom wrote about their prize - winning works years before being recognized by the Nobel Committee.
Scientific American publishes 14 local language editions, read in more
than 30 countries.
A science journalist for more
than 20 years, DiChristina first came to
Scientific American in 2001 as its executive editor, a position she held until her current appointment.
CHICAGO — One of the largest surveys of
American views on religion and science suggests that the religious and
scientific communities may be less combative
than is commonly portrayed in the media and in politics.
Polls such as the 2009 U.S. Religious and Landscape Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion & Public Life, have suggested that less
than half of all
Americans accept the
scientific theory of evolution.
Despite the advent of a new generation of stents, patients with multiple narrowed arteries in the heart who received coronary artery bypass grafting fared better
than those whose arteries were opened with balloon angioplasty and stents in a study presented at the
American College of Cardiology's 64th Annual
Scientific Session.
Worries about such virus exposure, however, have been echoed by more
than a half dozen top vaccine experts and epidemiologists in interviews with
Scientific American.
This was the gist of a talk Newman delivered on a cool, gray day last fall to a packed lecture hall in the cavernous Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, where more
than 5,000 emergency physicians from around the world gathered for the
Scientific Assembly of the
American College of Emergency Physicians.
«I look forward to helping
Scientific American make its blogging community stronger and more engaging
than ever.»
Modern diesel cars emit less pollution generally
than cars that run on gasoline, says a new six - nation study published today in
Scientific Reports whose groundwork was laid in part by an
American chemist now working at Université de Montréal.
As
Scientific American reported earlier this year, more
than half of the current cancer clinical trials do incorporate some form of immunotherapy but still oncologists are often only in the early stages of understanding how to use such treatment on a larger scale.
Scientific American's independent judging panel elected Shinozuka from a pool of 15
Scientific American Science in Action Award finalists, who were culled from thousands of Google Science Fair submissions from more
than 90 countries.
Before joining
Scientific American, he was senior writer at Climate Central, a nonprofit research and journalism organization, and before that he spent nearly 21 years at Time magazine, where he wrote more
than 50 cover stories on about science and the environment, along with many smaller pieces.
A science journalist for more
than 20 years, she first came to
Scientific American in 2001 as its executive editor.
He wrote the Mathematical Games column for
Scientific American magazine for 25 years and published more
than 70 books.
In «Astronomers Make a Map of a Super Saturn's Rings,» from the January issue of
Scientific American, the Leiden University astronomer Matthew Kenworthy tells the story of discovering a ring system some 200 times larger
than Saturn's around the distant star J1407.
Promoting the power and consequence of science «is more important
than ever right now,» particularly as critics question the role of evidence - based science in policymaking and as Congress considers significant proposed cuts to federal funding for scientific research that drives innovation, said Tobin Smith, vice president of policy at the Association of American Universities, during the March 27 S&T Policy Forum session «Advocating for Science: More Than a One - Day Activity.&ra
than ever right now,» particularly as critics question the role of evidence - based science in policymaking and as Congress considers significant proposed cuts to federal funding for
scientific research that drives innovation, said Tobin Smith, vice president of policy at the Association of
American Universities, during the March 27 S&T Policy Forum session «Advocating for Science: More
Than a One - Day Activity.&ra
Than a One - Day Activity.»
More
than 1000 experts (including
Scientific American editor - in - chief Mariette DiChristina) have gathered in Dubai to discuss big world problems such as climate change, poverty, water shortages, energy and innovation.
It was Gardner's first publication of a skeptical nature (he was the math games columnist for
Scientific American for more
than a quarter of a century).
Social scientist Roly Russell, of the Sandhill Institute in British Columbia, talked with
Scientific American's Mark Fischetti at the annual meeting of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science about potentially better measures
than GDP of a nation's well - being
New York artist Klara Hobza organized the event, inspired by a
Scientific American — sponsored paper airplane contest held in the same location (originally called the Great Hall and built to display rockets for the 1964 World's Fair) more
than 40 years ago.
He tells us that for five years from 1903, the claims of Wilbur and Orville Wright to have flown a machine that was heavier
than air were derided and dismissed by
Scientific American, in spite of «scores of public demonstrations, affidavits from local dignitaries, and photographs...» Apparently, what the Wrights had done was considered scientifically impossible and so all their evidence was ridiculed.
More to explore «Animal Mimics: More
than just camouflage» from
Scientific American «Ugly Animals Need Love, Too» from
Scientific American «Animal Mimicry» overview from Alleghany County Public Schools If You Can't Run, You've Got to Hide!
Despite the 1996 call by The Lancet's editor to fund Duesberg's research on AIDS, and despite
Scientific American's plea more than a decade later that the scientific community consider his theories on cancer, Peter Duesberg is still fighting daunting scientifi
Scientific American's plea more
than a decade later that the
scientific community consider his theories on cancer, Peter Duesberg is still fighting daunting scientifi
scientific community consider his theories on cancer, Peter Duesberg is still fighting daunting
scientificscientific battles.
Based on these findings, any shortage in America's
scientific labor market is «most likely a demand - side problem of STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] career opportunities that are less attractive
than career opportunities in other fields» rather
than a supply - side problem of too few
Americans with
scientific training, asserted Salzman in congressional testimony presented on 6 November before the House Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation.
Latinos who worry about having enough food to eat — so - called food insecurity — report having a poorer diet and exhibit worse glycemic control
than those who aren't worried about having sufficient food to survive, according to a study presented at the
American Diabetes Association's 75th
Scientific Sessions.
A professor of psychology and neuroscience at the University of Maryland, he has been engaged for more
than a decade in a wide - ranging intellectual pursuit that has taken him from the play of young chimpanzees to the history of
American sitcoms — all in search of a
scientific understanding of that most unscientific of human customs: laughter.
But,
Scientific American, among others, has argued that liquid coal could very well be worse
than gasoline, both environmentally and economically.
Since 1979, surveys have shown that roughly seven in 10
Americans believe the effects of
scientific research are more positive
than negative for society.
Join us below at 1:30 PM Eastern today (Thursday, June 21) to learn more during a live 30 - minute online chat at
Scientific American with David Biello, an energy and environment editor at SA for more
than six years.
Despite extensive efforts to develop practical applications for graphene and explore the exotic physics at work in its two dimensions, obtaining a usable sample is still more art
than science, as
Scientific American learned one slushy winter afternoon in the Columbia University lab of Philip Kim, one of our co-authors and a leader in the field.
More to explore Sink or Swim: Muscle versus Fat from
Scientific American Blubber from National Geographic Education Is Muscle a Better Insulator
than Fat in Cold and Heat?
As Robin Marantz Henig wrote in «Lifting the Black Cloud,» in the March issue of
Scientific American, the drugs that have long dominated the market — the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)-- «do not help everyone and eventually fail in more
than a third of users.
It takes no more
than a visit to a few labs or a glance at the crowd at a
scientific meeting to know that African -
American scientists are rare in biomedical research.
The longtime M * A * S * H actor hosted
Scientific American Frontiers (produced in association with this magazine) on PBS for more
than 11 years.
Scientific American has a broader role
than cheerleading for new science and technology.