Sentences with phrase «than a bang for»

On a set of «premium wind chimes,» James wrote: «When it comes to my house and my housewares, there's nothing I value more than bang for my buck.

As you know, the winter transfer window has closed, and perhaps unsurprisingly, it went out with more of a whisper than a bang for Atlético Madrid.

The smashup proved more whimper than bang for amateur observers, but LCROSS team members were thrilled.

Not exact matches

Containing eight fewer calories than a regular Bud but packing a boozy punch, these look to be aimed at a frat - boy crowd looking for more bang in every beer buck.

Governments generally get a much bigger stimulus bang for their buck when they spend directly on projects, such as roads and bridges, rather than giving cheques or tax breaks to individuals, who may choose to bank the money instead of spending it.

The key that you have to remember is you will get a lot more bang for your buck by targeting a large number of lower - traffic terms than by targeting a small number of higher - traffic terms.

The $ 29 and $ 79 plans for BigCommerce offer more bang for your buck than Shopify's equivalent plans.

The finding appears to extend to the macroeconomic level as well — shareholders in the larger economy got a much bigger bang for their buck when cash was returned to them as dividends than when it was deployed into capital expenditure.

For me to believe there's nothing higher than us, to believe we come from a «big bang», believe we're the only ones is just ridiculous.

This will also prove to be true for the big bang and it is already vastly vastly more likely than the god delusion.

His remark that a «big bang singularity» (p. 8) would be more likely as a first cause for the universe than God suggests that he is thinking of a cause that is first in time.

It gives corporate lobbying much more bang for their buck than K Street lobbyists.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

It is more expensive than white vinegar, but you get a little more bang for your buck.

The other two flavors will be a little bit more dry in texture, but they still taste amazing and I'd rather have a little bit of a difference in texture than add oil, which does not have great caloric or nutritional bang for your buck.

Nowadays I don't even care and honestly, I'm really glad my parents couldn't afford to make me a metal mouth back then... I had plenty of other things going for me at the time anyway... unruly curls WITH bangs, being a foot taller than every boy in school, and ohhh, let's not forget the time I thought it would be a good idea to get a FREAKIN PERM!!!

Who doesn't love getting the maximum bang for the buck — especially oohs and aahs at the table for something chocolate (and fancy - looking), that's way simpler to do than it looks?

3 months is looked at per minimum it take more than six months for a bone to heal some very minor muscle will take 3 months a serious injury which takes 8 months and more + rehabilitation while a player is rehabilitating other injuries my form a direct result of being constrained where muscles freeze you are not playing for 8 months you cant expect the muscles to be up and running straight away players how ever want to play because of all sort of reasons one being replaced so it hampers with their full recovery hence having players regularly in the treating room but take it from me some times you are perfect you just get back bang someone heavy dose your ankle in so you are back in out off playing time I personally got very angry because my knee was ok so went back out to come back in after one game with ankle problem after a couple of weeks i will go back out I have no guarantees that some one wouldn't go heavy on me or me injuring myself going heavy on someone else its football thats the way it is if it is not a medallion for the cabinet its a leg medallion

Anyways, Ramsey is more over hyped than Walcott, yet last season Mr inconsistent still managed to bang in19 goals in all competitions and Wenger went and dropped him after the Palace defeat for simply stating the truth that Palace were more up for it.

Xhaka is showing signs of improvement and may yet make an impact at Arsenal.As for Mustafi, with respect, you are deluding yourself if you think he will come good.He is bang average at best and is one of the players our Club should move on asap.As it is i doubt it any team would offer more than # 12m for him.

Elneny at # 5m is far better value for money than Xhaka and Mustafi who cost around # 65m combined.Elneny along with Monreal was outstanding against West Brom whilst Xhaka and Mustafi were at best bang average.How on earth the ref did not award a penalty for the clear foul on JJR is beyond me.Unfortunately Mustafi was culpable yet again when he committed himself to a ball, landed on his backside and was bailed out by the watchful Monreal.

Sure, he would still be able to bang in some goals for us, but i would rather have someone like Dybala or Lacazette, who both are more than good enough for the first team (at least a lot better than Welbeck to rotate with Giroud on top)

Few over-the-hill stars have given an MLS team more bang for their buck than Robbie Keane.

Every banging on about how cesc is better than ozil now bcz of burnley game, wenger needs to help ozil out this season and that is by having pace for him on the flanks no point putting cazorla and giroud togther with ozil if wenger continues to do this than ozil again will be wadted and will be called a failure

Their play hasn't dipped much with the injuries this year other than in the Carolina game and they have been banged up for almost every game.

Out of this he should spend that Lacazette money on Lukaku or Morata or Aubameyang.Morata is a player who I feel should he be given a team where he's the main man he's going to score a lot of goals.There's more to come from him.I think he'll do well here.It's a shame he usually warms the bench at Madrid.It makes him seem overrated but he's not.Lukaku has the height, physique, quality, speed, power, technique and finishing that Arsenal need in a striker.He looks like that kind of player who'll bang in a lot of goalsif given the chance in a top team.Aubameyang is very very fast and clinical and at his age he's at his best.If we sign him it's more likely he'll be here for a while than most of the two due to his age.

Top 5 is more than enough for his boss, so why buy the top players, when you can cruise to the top 5 place with bang average ones?

He's not a direct player for Sanchez more of an ozil type player which will give us more creativity and team play, rather than relying on one man, hopefully Laca will get a lot more service and start banging in the goals.

To summarise, you need as a top team (if we are one) a centre forward (preferably more than 1) that bang in the goals every week for fun in their PREFERRED AND NATURAL POSITIONS WHERE THEY HAVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN DOING SO.

They have a number of promising young centre backs who ought to be given an opportunity to prove themselves for the remainder of the season in the EPL matches.They simply can not be worse than the rapidly declining Koscielny and Mustafi who can not cope with the likes of Swansea, Bournemouth etc. let alone a team like Spurs.The lack of steel at the back impacts on our more attacking players as they know they need to score 2/3 goals to have any chance of producing a win.As usual Elneny has come in for criticism but the real culprits are our centre backs and Xhaka who seems to be a fixture regardless of being bang average.

Chelsea's need for Vardy is much more pressing than City's and, with Guus Hiddink keen to make him his first signing, this could be wrapped up quicker than you can «chat shit, get banged».

His teammate Jody Scheckter may have won the title that year, but it was Gilles who elevated himself to a god - like status that season by doing things like lapping 11 seconds faster than anyone else at a wet Watkins Glen and banging wheels with René Arnoux for lap after lap at Dijon.

walcott miss confidence but his movement is crazy, way better than anyone i saw this year, he had 3 clear chances, he just need to work on his confidence and he will bang 20 + for fun!!!

Mustafi & Cech have been awful for us and if we're comparing giroud to the pedigree of strikers that we are used to arsenal than again he is bang average.

Gunnerboss you were bang on about Theo up front, there can be no disputing that he is a much better player for us up there, the way he bent his run first half alone is a more natural than anything Iv ever seen him do on the wing.

I would not criticise the admission of a mistake in the market if it was dealt with quickly, rather than watching the hierarchy banging their head against a brick wall for years with players that clearly aren't good enough to achieve the club's supposed objectives.

The Heat say they have more than a few of those warrior - types as well, including Wade, who said privately before the game that he was amused about constant speculation surrounding his knee - which has been banged up for weeks.

He stops for a moment, but soon his need for connection grows bigger than his fear of your reaction, so he starts banging the wooden mixing spoon on the tabletop.

She will not use a spoon for anything other than banging on her high chair.

My girls used the bassinets for less than six months, so the bassinets didn't really provide much bang for their buck.

If you want to get the most bang for your campaign buck, go where the right people have already gathered, which in 2012 will usually mean Facebook, Twitter, blogs and other content websites — it's usually much easier to tap into an existing community than to create one of your own.

The element list helped prevent and diagnose more problems than I can remember over the course of this site's development, which in turn left so much more room for banging my head up against I'd REALLY done wrong — usually, to cause some element on the page to bump uglies with another.

Also in TechBytes: more detail on Obama's data - driven TV ad - buying effort, which helped him get far more bang for the buck than his rival (though with one caveat: I've also heard it said that Romney's ad - buying was particularly incompetent, which may skew the numbers).

The long - looming deadline — March 5 — for youthful immigrant Dreamers facing loss of legal status under Obama - era DACA protection came and went yesterday with more of a whimper than a bang.

TV stations are required to sell ads to campaigns at a discount, meaning that Crossroads GPS and its ilk are getting even less bang for their buck than the Obama campaign is.

They found that they got more bang for the buck with SMS than with emails, since recipients were much less likely to ignore a text message (an effect that may diminish as text messages» novelty fades).

«We're not getting the bang for the buck and it's so much more expensive than the regular Excelsior program,» DeFrancisco said.

The group that runs the Powerball lottery game approved, then abandoned, changes that would have given ticket buyers more bang for their two bucks than the redesign recently implemented.

Unlike the Democratic and Republican Party leviathans, we are a small organization with a budget of less than $ 2 million a year, yet we run hundreds of candidates in election years and generally get a very big bang for the buck.

If you're looking for the best bang for your buck, look no further than our budget pick made by Decade Awards.