Sentences with phrase «than a climate situation»

Amid anxieties over the effects of global warming on polar ice, some scientists have dubbed the ice break a geographical rather than a climate situation.

Not exact matches

Others say the situation in the U.S. shouldn't affect Canada's decision because fighting climate change is more important than protecting carbon - intensive industries.

If, however, the Catholic now sees that despite, and in addition to, his ethics based on essential natures, he must develop an individual ethics of concrete moral decision which goes beyond mere casuistry, and if the Protestant ethical theorist perhaps realizes that in the new and dangerous situation he must perhaps be less carefree in simply leaving the Christian to his «conscience», then perhaps the new situation will bring about a new climate in which, even theoretically, people will be compelled more readily to think towards one another rather than away from one another, and in which people will understand one another more easily and even gradually unite.

Yet in other respects — notably our ecclesiastical diversity, the freedom of the Church from state control, and the predominance of liberalism and fundamentalism rather than the new orthodoxy as the prevailing theological climate — our situation is different, and it will sharpen the discussion to keep it within such bounds.

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

In terms of global climate change, the new studies show that «the actual situation is worse» than policymakers realize, says Peter Griffith, an ecosystems ecologist with NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

Here the authors are not mentioning that values at the lower end of the spectrum represent a less dramatic situation than a value at the higher end of the spectrum, which probably would have really supported a climate catastrophe.

Decades of climate research could be wrong, meaning we're in a much worse situation than previously thought.

However, the situation is more urgent and climate «scientists» are more sure now than they were 6 years ago?

There's a growing body of evidence that species in vulnerable situations are far more able to withstand or adjust to climate extremes than once thought — from California butterflies to Pacific corals, if given some space and limiting other pressures.

We can — and should — address the risk of climate change based on sound science without succumbing to the no - growth radicalism that treats climate questions as dogma rather than as situations to be managed responsibly.»

While the climate situation is far worse than most people think, the options for quickly phasing out fossil fuel and nuclear energy and replacing them with clean renewable energy sources are much better than most people think.

Could some aspect of our situation, e.g. the extreme rapidity of the forcing change, be sufficiently novel to make Earth's climate respond differently than it has in the past, and could this cause divergence from models based on paleoclimate sensitivity estimates?

When climate change is the encumbrance to farmers and food systems, then what could aggravate the situation more than climate «solutions» that overturn the stability of food production further?

There may come a moment when the situation becomes «so dire that doing climate geoengineering of this sort is better than the alternative — doing nothing,» he says.

And while there may be some dangers, it's hard to think of a climate policy situation in Australia that's any more problematic than what has come before.

Hoggan emphasized the importance of linking the industry's «unjust misinformation» back to an overall narrative about sustainability, rather than getting mired in issues of whose fault climate change is and who should do what to ameliorate the situation.

More than a century later, despite irrefutable scientific evidence for climate change, mainstream media coverage of situation in the US has scarcely improved.

According to David Wasdell, International Coordinator, Meridian Programme: «A runaway climate change is now clear and beginning to be quantified for the first time... the greatest threat we face as a planet... The rate of change we're generating in the current situation is between 200 - 300 times faster than that experience of any extinction event apart from the asteroidal impact.

Jotzo, who is attending the conference in Beijing, added: «Globally I think we are in a much better situation than we were leading into the [major UN climate change talks] Copenhagen summit in 2009.

The situation is indeed clear; we can logically conclude from geology, physics, climate science, ecology, and economics that a few hundred more ppm of CO2 would most likely be net beneficial globally and even for those areas or circumstances in which global warming would not be beneficial it would be considerably more feasible and cost effective to implement local adaptations than attempt global mitigation which comes with no money - back guarantees should the entire (100 %) world not play ball.

When I suggest we have a polar opposite situation here, enviro - activists appearing to be doing all the racketeering to keep their cause alive in the face of withering science - based criticism, this sort of thing is what I'm talking about — Newsweek «s Sharon Begley practically yelling about the need to stop skeptic climate scientists in their tracks, and less than three years later, Dr Schneider telling policy analysts and media experts at a major symposium exactly how such critics can be marginalized.

The use of the term «collapse,» which connotes an imminent calamity, rather than a long, relatively slow process (glaciers melting at, literally, a glacial pace) generated quite a bit of chatter in the climate journalism community, but in interviews, scientists defended the word as apt for this situation.

So over the last six months, a vast gulf has opened up between the media - stoked perception that the climate science has been exaggerated and the research - driven evidence that the true situation is worse than we thought.

Worst Case Climate Change consists of negative changes not seen in everyday life, other than climate scientists, and therefore it is difficult, if not impossible, for ordinary people to understand the gravity of this sitClimate Change consists of negative changes not seen in everyday life, other than climate scientists, and therefore it is difficult, if not impossible, for ordinary people to understand the gravity of this sitclimate scientists, and therefore it is difficult, if not impossible, for ordinary people to understand the gravity of this situation.

If countries instead abide by the pledges to cut carbon emissions after 2020 that they each made voluntarily ahead of the Paris climate summit, the average temperature will likely go up by at least two degrees Celsius, a less - than - catastrophic situation that could «still destroy most coral reefs and glaciers and melt significant parts of the Greenland ice cap, bringing major rises in sea levels,» according to The Guardian.

The current situation for the climate sciences has been described as «a struggle about the truth of the state of climate» (Romm 2010), and a number of books even claim that climate science myths have been introduced to society in a distorted way, causing more confusion than enlightenment (Oreskes and Conway 2008; Gelbspan 1997; Hoggan et al. 2009; Mooney 2006).

All of this is naturally unsatisfying and not what economists are used to doing, but in rare situations like climate change where DT [Dismal Theorem: price of future consumption, E [M λ] for λ, the lower bound on consumption, large] applies we may be deluding ourselves and others with misplaced concreteness if we think that we are able to deliver anything much more precise than this with even the biggest and most detailed climate - change IAMs as currently constructed and deployed.

Employing a political ecology framework, I endeavor to articulate the multiple levels at which this issue unfolds, describing the correlation between the circulation of climate change discourse and the resurgence of hydroelectric power at the global level; how this situation has been engaged at the national level within contemporary Costa Rica; and how all of this plays out in contestation concerning dam construction within specific sites in the country, particularly the controversial Río Pacuare in the eastern highlands, where the merits of a major dam proposal have been questioned for more than two decades.

Probability-wise shifting the mean back O. 3 C or so, to match the situation in the Midwest, you might go from 4.5 sigma to 4.6 sigma making the extreme 1.6 times less likely for a 100 year timescale climate estimate than for a 30 year timescale climate estimate.

An increase in the atmosphere's concentration of carbon dioxide is also a climate forcing: it leads to a situation in which the planet absorbs more solar radiation than it emits to space as longwave radiation.

But from a climate change perspective the situation is even worse than that would indicate, because coal will be the basic fuel source.

One confirms the estab - lished assumptions about climate change, implying that climate change is proceeding faster than expected and the situation thus at least as dramatic as assumed.

The burden of my thoughts are very much that the climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.

Our conceptualization of the interplay between personality and relationship conflict is in line with the situational congruence model [15] and the person - environment fit framework [16]; [17] as we argue that change in teamwork mental models (the dissonance between expected teamwork quality and real teamwork quality experienced while performing the collective task) is less strong for situations of fit rather than a misfit between group members» personality and a conflicting group climate.