What could be more horrifying
than a god who with the temper of an angry two year old and responds by slaughtering innocents?
I mean, I respectfully asked God this question, I also asked him does the god of this world have more power of influence
than the God who created the world?
Yep, the big bang, with all its evidence, is much more absurd
than a god who «speaks» everything into existence.
And above all, we should be on our guard against preaching a gospel in which the God who is proclaimed as active in Christ is other
than the God who is the Lord of all creation.
The only possible textual basis for this reading makes much of the fact that it is an angel rather
than God Himself who calls a halt to the sacrifice.
I have wondered this for a long time — why do they think that making God into a puppet - master makes him greater
than a God who can bring about His highest good amidst our freedom?
Rather
than a God who was supposedly behind everything bad that happened (dishing out punishment, judgment or whatever you want to call it), we find the God who loves, the God who freely gives grace and fellowship with himself.
And when people project this limitation onto God, they assume that a God who faced possibilities rather than a single certainty has much less control over things
than the God who faces a single certainty.
Of course, in the process of writing this, I have issues with «intervene», as it points to a God who is separate from creation and who only interacts at select times, rather
than a God who is the foundation for, and permeates all of creation.
The God described in the Bible is none other
than the God who is already known in the framework of our traditional African religiosity.
Instead, God brought them, for the God described in the Bible is none other
than the God who was already known in the framework of our traditional African religiosity.
And I know that an inclusive God certainly seems higher
than a God who creates people to live for a moment and suffer eternal torture.
It seems that no one understood this better
than God who, knowing that in our humanity we relate to each other by sense, sent His Son to us that we might know that our God is not far away but enters fully into the length and breadth, height and depth of our human experience.
Creation is called to love, as it is infused with the love of God, and it is fitting that the highest object of creation's love should be God himself, for nothing within creation could be a more fitting object of love
than the God who lovingly created.
Whitehead's God whose action is limited to persuasion, is more powerful
than a God who omnipotently determines every event that happens.
This means that a God who can grow and improve upon himself is more perfect
than a God who remains static and unchanging, while other elements of reality are growing and improving.
To me it primarily matters because it sets us up to believe in a God who is angry and ready to kill somebody rather
than a God who is a loving father who steps in front of the train, shoving us off the tracks in order to set us free to live.
That said, Buffett's rule has more immediate teeth (if the CEO means it, and Buffett did), and will probably get more people to comply
than God who only threatens the Last Judgment, which seems so far away.
Not exact matches
I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully
God, there is more
than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of
who He is and what He stood for.
«
God to me is a lot more of a metaphysical reality
than to many people
who take the concept quite literally.
It doens» t have a consistent theme or message or mission statement... the musical catalogue of Bob Marley holds together better
than that mishmash of contradictions and highly unlikely scenarios written by people
who although they were ignorant on ALL other subjects were somehow experts on this
god... what a laugh
Yeah that's definitely crazier
than thinking a
God who loves us just sits back and watches people die in the street.If I lost a loved one in that shooting and someone told me it was par tof
God's plan?
That's way more
than anyone
who doesn't know
God, has.
These days, for some people, the book has been turned into an icon for worship as the literal representation of
God and rather
than use it as intended it is now used as both a bludgeon upon intelligence itself and a blindfold upon those
who hold it up as their worldly deity.
Now men
who know more
than God [sarcasm] decide they don't like that saying, and it doesn't fit in their thinking, so off they go and write books and develope a following of other people
who don't like the truth of what Jesus said.
There are a lot of «accepting» Christians
who think, as Christine posted earlier, that eventually we gays will «see
God's way for [us]», i.e., eventually we'll see that
God has a better way for us
than to be practicing gays and lesbians.
how brain that is in your body works zillion times better
than a super computer, u can never deny of a genius
God who created that brain.
Seems doubtful so I would rather not waste my time trying to convince you that
God, Christ, and Christianity are all far, far, far more reasonable
than you or anyone else
who is blinded by the old Devil (AKA «the father of lies»)
I'm an atheist
who doesn't agree with anything Dawkins says, other
than «there is no
God».
As Samuel would later say to Saul
who saw it fit to disobey the command of
God — «to obey is better
than sacrifice»
This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people
who believe
God is a fantasy)-- rather
than offer a defense they will attack in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.
Science may never meet
God, but the intelligent scientists are the ones
who will find the truth sooner
than others.
The possibility that «
God» is nothing more
than an ancient astronaut (alien)
who might have created the first «adam» and «eve» in the garden of «eden» using genetics and something that we call... science.
The leaders claim to speak for «
God» when all they do is rehash archaic MAN MADE dogma attributed to a «
God»
who more closely resembles man's feeble mind and violent nature rather
than the other way around.
Throughout the book he pats himself on his wonderfully brilliant back for being so much smarter
than those idiots
who believe in
God.
well chutty - oh where to start - if you don't beleive in
god, fine... then don't... i don't beleive in mermaids, but i don't espouse my non-belief as «passionate»... nor do i denegrate those
who may believe in mermaids with derogatory labels like zionist or evangelist... if you don't believe in
god, then your belief in your fellow man should be a little stronger
than having to slap labels on them....
Paul Mariani's poem «Solar Ice,» which centers on a Mass, has a «preconciliar» feel, as a «clear demarcation of place and hierarchy exists between the priest,
who is titled the equivalent of
God rather
than his profession, and the lay congregation.»
I leave it to one of the greatest minds of all time
who wrote... Quote: «The word
God is for me nothing more
than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.»
If you say neither
than it is satan cuz he loves people
who deny
God.
Worse
than that, the apostles made us worship Jesus -
who in reality was punished by
God for his own wrongdoing!
«Religious people think Atheists are people
who have been subtly convinced by the devil to believe in themselves more
than believing in
God...»
Rather
than looking at corporate work as the evil scourge of the earth (though you certainly want to make sure your personal values align with an organization's corporate values), riding the elevator to the 11th floor every day may be exactly where
God needs you to develop your spiritual character, your gifts and to reach those
who are broken, empty and living without knowing their Savior.
I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently
than she did... for those people
who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a
God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those
who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...
I guess those
who do not believe in
God have nothing better to do
than spend their time writing negatively about
God and those
who believe in
God in a blog called «belief».
more
than 02 billions of christians are belive in Jesus the human
god, more
than 900 millions of Hidus are believe in Krishna the human
god more
than 300 millions of Buddahs are belive in Buda the human
god, and many others are belive in the human
god who will come in the end of days to save the human kind.
And when the bible say's something about the weight of the wind it was bronze age herdsmen
who had felt more
than a few stiff breezes describing it, not divine inspiration from
God letting those herdsmen know that air has a measurable weight.
all things were created by nothing with nothing and for nothing... that takes more faith
than i have... i prefer to believe in Jesus Christ — the one and only
who rose from the dead — the most astounding historical fact ever recorded; Christians don't have all the answers but as the author Don Miller noted: «I can no more understand the complexity of
God than the pancakes I made for breakfast can understand the complexity of me»
Friend of Brian's I'm sorry to burst your bubble here, but every major heresy that has inflicted
God's people for the last 2,000 years has come from organized groups with «leaders»
who thought they knew
God's mind better
than anyone around them.
The Vision document has four main elements: equipping children academically and emotionally for the world; providing places of healing for children
who have mental health problems or
who've suffered bad experiences; providing a welcoming place for all rather
than just Christians, and; upholding the dignity and respect of each individual,
who is made by
God.
The atheist
who claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and more to be pitied
than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before
God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met
God, they never knew
God and they never understood
God.They are devoid of the Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe
Gods gift of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to
God, but their lying nature makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.
God bless