the problem, other
than the morality which I've outlined, is practical.
Not exact matches
This would assume an «imaginative,» not a historical, disposition: a divine intent in history, God - gifted immutable laws of
morality, to
which man has a duty to conform; order as a first requirement of good governance, achieved best by a restraint and respect for custom and tradition; variety as more desirable
than systematic uniformity and liberty more desirable
than equality; the honor and duty of a good life in a good community as taking precedence over individual desire; an embrace of a skepticism toward reason and abstract principle.
3) There is no reason why religion should hold a monopoly upon
morality, and I would go so far as to argue that any
morality which is based on religion is always going to be weaker
than a secular
morality.
Whatever doubts may exist about the sources of this democracy, there can be none about the chief source of the
morality that gives it life and substance... [From the Hebrew tradition, via the Puritans, come] the contract and all its corollaries; the higher law as something more
than a «brooding omnipresence in the sky»; the concept of the competent and responsible individual; certain key ingredients of economic individualism; the insistence on a citizenry educated to understand its rights and duties; and the middle - class virtues, that high plateau of moral stability on
which, so Americans believe, successful democracy must always build [Seedtime of the Republic (Harcourt, Brace, 1953, p. 55)-RSB-.
As my American friend observed, this was present under the surface long before the scandals broke, and at the root of it is probably the widespread rejection of Catholic teaching on sexual
morality,
which emerged later in Ireland
than other Catholic countries.
Many people, I am convinced, still regard the higher
morality which they look for and advocate as no more
than a sort of compensation or external counter-balance, to be adroitly applied to the human machine from outside in order to off - set the overflow of Matter within it.
The keepers of those myths that you probably have the most issue with, somewhat successfully changed the meaning of the word myth to the word lie... to make their own myths (
which they called parables and
which were presented more in allegorical
than historical form), to in their minds be perceived more as truth... and in God's own poetic justice, now have their cherished tales of perceived
morality thrown into the same category by those who make the same efforts at understnding the meanings.
And I have been largely reluctant to talk publicly about my opinions on the
morality of the issue, something I believe the church has said enough about at this point (and recklessly so,
which has done more harm
than good).
Which tells me we care more about our ideas and our
morality and our programs
than we do the people.
Even the concept of natural law,
which probably lends itself to rational definition and defense more readily
than any other theological version of
morality, makes little sense without God as its ultimate premise.
Rather they have been happy to suggest, - more often by subtle implication and spin
than with straightforward candour - that (i) the priesthood is fairly riddled with abusers, (ii) there is an international culture of cover - up in the Church
which (iii) goes right to the top of the Church, and (iv) that Catholic institutions such as celibacy and hierarchy are to blame — even that Catholic teaching of children about its sexual
morality is a form of intellectual abuse of large numbers of children.
The more serious effort to concern itself primarily with ethical rather
than theological problems, as the followers of Bonhoeffer have done, has led them outside the framework of biblical language and judgment, and has tended to dissolve their religious answers either into personal
morality or social activism
which, while serious in its intention, has made them weathercocks turning freely in the cultural winds.
This differs from either positive or pessimistic accounts in that rather
than subscribing humans to one predominant characteristic (good or bad), it stresses the pivotal role of emotional and contextual factors
which shape human behaviour and
morality.
The story seemed to reflect the
morality of the period in
which it was set, rather
than that of the author.
There's no wishful thinking here, nor any allegiance to fad diets
which are based on perceived
morality rather
than actual human physiology.
What the film is saying about goodness (or ugliness or badness) is unclear as the «good» is just as bad as the «ugly,» but I can imagine that it's attempting to show that
morality is more contextual
than absolute, creating, as it does, an environment in
which everybody is immoral even the Union and Confederate troops, who seem to be passing through this film on their way to another.
Pakula had better luck with his 1990 adaptation of a Scott Turow novel, Presumed Innocent,
which seemed more an indictment of the previous decade's facility with
morality than these later attempts at grasping the fascination we developed as a culture in 1994 for the O.J. Simpson trial.
It feels like for the majority of this decade Japanese (non-Atlus) developers have been increasingly retreating behind clichés to the extent that the characters are scarcely more nuanced
than morality play archetypes of the middle ages... it's just another way in
which their industry has languished.
In Dwellers on the Threshold, DeVincentis draws on myths emerging from her subconscious and upon art and literature from both east and west to create an open - ended humanist narrative, (less a formal or structured narrative
than that of the Pre-Raphaelites); one
which contains multiple readings, and
which questions individual and collective
morality in our time of great unease and dislocation.
your... anecdotes, I was quite clear that «my» anecdote about the SS officer and the Jew was something from a debate about relative
morality, a debate
which happened between two people that are other
than myself.
Guardian writers use «science» as a puppet to act out
morality plays, in
which their own fantasies are seemingly given authority by the invoking of «stark» or «dire» — typically, the «starkest» or «direst» yet — «warnings» that things are «worse
than previously thought».
«There is, perhaps, no profession after that of the sacred ministry, in
which a high - toned
morality is more imperatively necessary
than that of the law.